Started By
Message
re: Ranking the SEC offenses from worst to first
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:11 am to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:11 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Bama's offensive output actually regressed under Kiffin.
This statement and accompanying graphs seem to have upset some people.
2
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:13 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
This statement and accompanying graphs seem to have upset some people.
Probably because there are at least 10 statements you can make after reading those graphs and the one you made would be towards the bottom
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:17 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:17 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Bama's offensive output actually regressed under Kiffin.
quote:
This statement and accompanying graphs seem to have upset some people.
Because it's relative. He scored more points per game. But yards per game was down.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:19 am to Frac the world
quote:
Give me meat grinding drives instead of quick scores all day, that's what allowed Clemson to win the natty.
quote:That's more due to facing an offense that could actually move the ball on your stellar defense. Frankly, that's just not going to happen very often, and even when it did it took them everyone of those 99 snaps to actually beat you.
Until you lose a national championship game because your defense was on the field for 99 snaps.
What usually happened with the Kiffin offense is that you managed three or four quick scores in your first half dozen possessions, while your defense was holding your opponent in check, which led to a lot of 21-0 or 28-3 type halftime scores, most of which ended up as 48-17 type blowouts.
The only losses you had under Kiffin (save for maybe Ole Miss in '14) came when your defense failed you. I don't know enough about your new OC, but he will have to be pretty damn good to keep that up.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:20 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:26 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Who can forget that powerhouse offense that showed up at Athens last year.
They didn't score much on us in Jordan Hare either. Their QB has started 3 games and he is in Heisman discussion.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:26 am to indytyger
Fla too hi....lo...this list is upside down and I'm foncused.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:26 am to indytyger
O'Gara missed the mark in his quick summary of Georgia. As has often been the case, it is our OL and not the skilled players that are the limiting factor for our offense. If Eason blossoms as projected and with Chubb and Michel in the backfield, the offense should be in good shape if the OL can do their job.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:30 am to GurleyGirl
y'all still have Chaney though
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:30 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Bama's offensive output actually regressed under Kiffi
So you are saying it was better under Mac and Nuss? Hmmmmm
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:38 am to Carolina_Girl
South Carolina has some pretty good players at the skill positions, but that line should be a huge concern.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:39 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:41 am to indytyger
quote:
13. FL
Like the Jeffersons, we gonna be movin' on up this year.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:45 am to indytyger
OM, Arkansas, Alabama and Mizzou will all be in the top five. Probably auburn too.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:49 am to BasedGator
quote:
So you are saying it was better under Mac and Nuss? Hmmmmm
Been saying that for a while.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:49 am to VivaZapata27
quote:
OM, Arkansas, Alabama and Mizzou will all be in the top five.
Delusions
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:51 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:51 am to indytyger
quote:
7. LSU
Too high.
No one cares who your QB is and your running back will blow now that he's the main one getting game planned for.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:52 am to indytyger
I'm surprised anyone ranked LSU at 7. All we read about is inexperience and lack of depth on the OL and a lousy QB. Damn, Guice must be all world! :)
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:52 am to mckibaj
quote:
Because it's relative. He scored more points per game. But yards per game was down.
Non-offensive touchdowns inflating the numbers.
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:53 am to BigSlick
quote:
I'm surprised anyone ranked LSU at 7. All we read about is inexperience and lack of depth on the OL and a lousy QB. Damn, Guice must be all world! :)
I think it will be better than 7 by the end of the season. Nobody really knows what to expect yet.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:54 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:54 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Non-offensive touchdowns inflating the numbers.
So what are the numbers prior to non O td's for each prior and after?
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:55 am to TheGusBus34
quote:
Auburn's 2nd team offense isn't listed
Brah, somebody will start a thread ranking SEC defenses and that will be listed as #1. Give it time.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News