Started By
Message
Question on 2-year bowl ban and transferring
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:56 pm
You can transfer without sitting out if your team gets hit with a 2 year bowl game. If OM gets their punishment and it's 2 year bowl ban, with it being in the middle of year 1 bowl ban, what happens? Do they still let mass the transfers happen? Or would hey have to sit out since the players only have one year bowl ban left? I'm still shocked they haven't had any transfers yet.
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 7:59 pm
4
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:58 pm to Big4Dawg
quote:
1 bowl ban
Literally will not happen. Ole Miss is halfway to China in the hole that they dug.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:58 pm to Big4Dawg
With 2 year bowl ban, student-athletes can transfer and be immediately eligible.
1 year bowl ban they have to sit out one year.
1 year bowl ban they have to sit out one year.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 7:59 pm to Devil_doge
I get that. But since they are already in the middle of year 1, a player wouldn't transfer until next summer, when there is only 1 year left. what happens?
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:01 pm to Big4Dawg
If a player transfers now, that player has to sit out a year.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:01 pm to Big4Dawg
The current bowl ban is self imposed.
The 2 year bowl ban won't happen until the NCAA announces the penalties which will total 3 years total for ole miss and allow players to transfer.
The 2 year bowl ban won't happen until the NCAA announces the penalties which will total 3 years total for ole miss and allow players to transfer.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:03 pm to DaleDenton
So what if it's only 1 more additional year? (2 total years). Can they transfer next summer without sitting out?
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:05 pm to Big4Dawg
Yes
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:06 pm to Big4Dawg
Then NCAA is going to levy 2 years on top of OM 1.
Players will be allowed to transfer.
OM appeals and the NCAA reduces it to 2 total as the loss in upperclassmen and talent is harsher than OM playing for a trip to Birmingham 2 years from now.
Players will be allowed to transfer.
OM appeals and the NCAA reduces it to 2 total as the loss in upperclassmen and talent is harsher than OM playing for a trip to Birmingham 2 years from now.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:10 pm to DaleDenton
Once the 2nd year (at least) bowl ban is announced look for a ton of players from all classes to transfer.
I doubt Shea or Little transfers though as they are only going to play 3 years and declare for the draft anyways.
I doubt Shea or Little transfers though as they are only going to play 3 years and declare for the draft anyways.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:14 pm to Rebel
Why would they not transfer and play for a competitive team and probably a better coaching staff?
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:19 pm to Rebel
While not related to your question, this just underscores for me how toothless a bowl ban is after this season, as they likely wouldn't have enough wins to be bowl eligible anyway.
The types of possible sanctions that would devastate the program are:
- No home games in one season
- Scholarships being decimated
- Reduction in the number of asst. coaches
- Loss of off-campus recruiting; no paid recruiting visits
The types of possible sanctions that would devastate the program are:
- No home games in one season
- Scholarships being decimated
- Reduction in the number of asst. coaches
- Loss of off-campus recruiting; no paid recruiting visits
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:20 pm to Big4Dawg
Those 2 are going pro after 3 years regardless of what happens.
By the time sanctions are announced they will only have 1 year left.
The NFL is already aware of them. They don't need to transfer. I guess it's always possible. But it's my opinion they don't.
By the time sanctions are announced they will only have 1 year left.
The NFL is already aware of them. They don't need to transfer. I guess it's always possible. But it's my opinion they don't.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:20 pm to Big4Dawg
Depends when the sanctions are announced and they may hurt their draft stick by transferring and showing an inability to learn the playbook or get on the field at their new destination.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:25 pm to Big4Dawg
quote:
I get that. But since they are already in the middle of year 1, a player wouldn't transfer until next summer, when there is only 1 year left. what happens?
Would like to know the answer as well
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:27 pm to Big4Dawg
quote:
. If OM gets their punishment and it's 2 year bowl ban,
There will be big parties and dancing in the streets in Oxford and Shep Smith may even sponsor a "free glory hole" party
This post was edited on 7/23/17 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:34 pm to EKG
quote:
The types of possible sanctions that would devastate the program are: - No home games in one season - Scholarships being decimated - Reduction in the number of asst. coaches - Loss of off-campus recruiting; no paid recruiting visits
Not to mention a TV ban as well.
NCAA is going to hit Ole Miss where it hurts the most, the bank account.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:38 pm to Devil_doge
I don't disagree.
The problem with TV bans is that they penalize OM opponents as well.
The problem with TV bans is that they penalize OM opponents as well.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:39 pm to Devil_doge
I bet if players with only one year left of eligibility will be able to transfer no sit if the NCAA adds one more after this year.
Posted on 7/23/17 at 8:42 pm to EKG
If 3-4 players from each class transfer (and I think that is a low number) it will be devasting. Even more so when Schollie reductions are factored in.
OM is about to be "Walk-on U".
OM is about to be "Walk-on U".
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News