Started By
Message
re: Question for LSU fans
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:05 pm to NIH
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:05 pm to NIH
It's not about the number of games when you compare Bama to OSU. It's the fact that a rematch is possible...that's when ya bring up us not only beating them but us beating them AND having to play more games. That's the difference between Bama and OSU. But, it's like ESPN said...our reward for having beat Bama already is that we don't have to win the SECCG.
Regardless, I'm for a rematch, and having a shot to win the SECCG is great in itself. It's one extra game, yeh, but that's pride and glory in itself.
Regardless, I'm for a rematch, and having a shot to win the SECCG is great in itself. It's one extra game, yeh, but that's pride and glory in itself.
0
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:05 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Losing to Iowa State is hitting all the marks?
why do you only compare your losses. Compare wins and they fricking own Alabama.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:06 pm to Raz4back
quote:
What's the difference in Bama getting to the title game after playing 12 games and OSU getting to the title game after playing 12 games? I
There is no difference except that we already beat Bama and OSU may end up being a conference champion - they've already clinched a partial conf championship to date which is more than Bama has accomplished.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:06 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
put the rematch bull shite on the backburner. we have a game to go play in that your irrelevant team will probably never manage to win with that mickey mouse coach you have.
Can you answer a reasonable question, or is it that there is no answer because 12 games is 12 games. I actually hope LSU wins the title, but it's weak posters such as yourself that do nothing but flame opposing fan bases that make it hard to cheer for LSU.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:07 pm to Raz4back
quote:
Can you answer a reasonable question, or is it that there is no answer because 12 games is 12 games. I actually hope LSU wins the title, but it's weak posters such as yourself that do nothing but flame opposing fan bases that make it hard to cheer for LSU.
I would normally agree with you, but considering your posting brethren over the last few weeks, you really should expect this.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:09 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
There is no difference except that we already beat Bama and OSU may end up being a conference champion - they've already clinched a partial conf championship to date which is more than Bama has accomplished.
Thanks for actually answering the question. Bama not winning the conference championship is completely valid. My point is the extra game argument that gets thrown around. At least you will acknowledge that there is no difference in Bama not playing an extra game.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:09 pm to Raz4back
quote:
posters such as yourself that do nothing but flame opposing fan bases that make it hard to cheer for LSU.
only to the shitty fricking Arkansas fan base that has done nothing but flamed this board since November of last year.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:10 pm to Elleshoe
it's amazing how their numbers dwindled in such short notice 
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:14 pm to Elleshoe
See, this is why it's impossible to have any type of discussion with most LSU fans on this subject.
I'm not comparing losses, wins, or anything else.
The guy said "OSU hit all the marks they could."
bullshite they did - they lost to Iowa State.
I never said one word about Alabama's wins, losses, or what marks they did or didn't hit.
No team has "hit all the marks they could" - except LSU.
But, LSU has to play someone in the title game and who that team is is determined by the system in place.
You frickers act like Alabama fans shouldn't be excited or even want a shot at the title.
Yes, LSU beat Alabama earlier in the season.
But unfortunately for your myopic fanbase, one game does not a season make.
If the system in place puts Alabama in the title game, then that's the way it is.
LSU fans should be very familiar from benefiting from the system, being the only team in history to go to said title game with 2 losses.
I'm not comparing losses, wins, or anything else.
The guy said "OSU hit all the marks they could."
bullshite they did - they lost to Iowa State.
I never said one word about Alabama's wins, losses, or what marks they did or didn't hit.
No team has "hit all the marks they could" - except LSU.
But, LSU has to play someone in the title game and who that team is is determined by the system in place.
You frickers act like Alabama fans shouldn't be excited or even want a shot at the title.
Yes, LSU beat Alabama earlier in the season.
But unfortunately for your myopic fanbase, one game does not a season make.
If the system in place puts Alabama in the title game, then that's the way it is.
LSU fans should be very familiar from benefiting from the system, being the only team in history to go to said title game with 2 losses.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:15 pm to Raz4back
quote:
Thanks for actually answering the question. Bama not winning the conference championship is completely valid. My point is the extra game argument that gets thrown around. At least you will acknowledge that there is no difference in Bama not playing an extra game.
There is a difference when that game comes about within the framework of the same conference Alabama plays in.
Nobody said Ohio State had an advantage over Florida in 06, USC over Texas in 05, etc. But you are kidding yourself if you actually believe people wouldn't have had the same argument...and I would venture to say you wouldn't be saying it was invalid...if Texas had to win in order to play Oklahoma, Florida had to win to play Georgia...or to put it in current perspective, if Oregon had to win this week to play Stanford.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:17 pm to BamaChick
quote:
But unfortunately for your myopic fanbase, one game does not a season make.
yoda's a fricking girl everybody, never knew that.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:18 pm to BamaChick
quote:
BamaChick
But wait, osu's sos was higher! :stats:
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:20 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
only to the shitty fricking Arkansas fan base that has done nothing but flamed this board since November of last year.
I have not flamed LSU one time. Hell, I almost went to LSU to play baseball. I've always respected the Tigers and while there are some moronic Arkansas posters on this board, Hawgalude I'm looking at you, there are just as many from other fan bases, you included. Just because I ask a question that you don't want to answer and I am a Razorback fan, you resort to the same tired and pathetic flame attempts.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:23 pm to BamaChick
quote:
See, this is why it's impossible to have any type of discussion with most LSU fans on this subject.
I'm not comparing losses, wins, or anything else.
The guy said "OSU hit all the marks they could."
bullshite they did - they lost to Iowa State.
I never said one word about Alabama's wins, losses, or what marks they did or didn't hit.
No team has "hit all the marks they could" - except LSU.
But, LSU has to play someone in the title game and who that team is is determined by the system in place.
You frickers act like Alabama fans shouldn't be excited or even want a shot at the title.
Yes, LSU beat Alabama earlier in the season.
But unfortunately for your myopic fanbase, one game does not a season make.
If the system in place puts Alabama in the title game, then that's the way it is.
LSU fans should be very familiar from benefiting from the system, being the only team in history to go to said title game with 2 losses.
look sweetheart, men are talking here.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:23 pm to BamaChick
quote:
You frickers act like Alabama fans shouldn't be excited or even want a shot at the title.
You should probably calm down a little, you sound exactly like the people you're bitching about. The thought of an Alabama fan calling any fan base myopic is laughable.
We have to play someone and it will be Alabama. Alabama has a strong case to be in, there is no doubt about it. But do not think for a second there isn't a legit argument against Alabama, and do not think that argument is only coming from LSU fans. Sure we have idiots that are going over board with it, but do not pretend your fan base does not have just as many idiots being just as absurd even when someone does attempt to have a rational discussion.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:24 pm to Raz4back
quote:
I have not flamed LSU one time. Hell, I almost went to LSU to play baseball. I've always respected the Tigers and while there are some moronic Arkansas posters on this board, Hawgalude I'm looking at you, there are just as many from other fan bases, you included. Just because I ask a question that you don't want to answer and I am a Razorback fan, you resort to the same tired and pathetic flame attempts.
its a dumb fricking question. no one is saying Alabama shouldn't be in because they played one less game. People are saying they shouldn't be in because they didn't even earn the right to play in the SEC title game so why should they earn the right to play for the title? That may or may not be my personal belief but that's what people mean. Are you too fricking retarded to understand that or do you need me to break it down line item for you?
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:27 pm to MOT
quote:
I would venture to say you wouldn't be saying it was invalid...if Texas had to win in order to play Oklahoma, Florida had to win to play Georgia...or to put it in current perspective, if Oregon had to win this week to play Stanford.
Does LSU have to win to get to the title game? Every talking head I've seen has said LSU is in regardless. If LSU were to loose to Georgia, and that won't happen, and didn't get in it would be complete bullshite. If the title game was already predetermined in the cases that you mentioned, as it appears that it is now, I would feel the same way.
This post was edited on 11/29/11 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:27 pm to Elleshoe
Thankfully for Alabama, conference title isn't necessary amirite? Just being #2 is good enough.
Pointless thread is pointless. If Alabama stays at #2, they'll play. If not, they won't. It really doesn't matter. Football will still be played next year, and someone else will get a shot at it.
Pointless thread is pointless. If Alabama stays at #2, they'll play. If not, they won't. It really doesn't matter. Football will still be played next year, and someone else will get a shot at it.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:29 pm to hwnd
quote:
Pointless thread is pointless. If Alabama stays at #2, they'll play. If not, they won't. It really doesn't matter. Football will still be played next year, and someone else will get a shot at it.
haha bullshite. You people can convince yourselves of anything. Every one of you stupid fricks would lose their mind if OSU somehow jumped you. It won't happen, but just to watch the deserved meltdown would be enough for me.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 11:29 pm to hwnd
quote:
Thankfully for Alabama, conference title isn't necessary amirite? Just being #2 is good enough.
Pointless thread is pointless. If Alabama stays at #2, they'll play. If not, they won't. It really doesn't matter. Football will still be played next year, and someone else will get a shot at it.
this. I mean frick. Is he too dense to see why LSU fans would rather not play Alabama again? I think LSU wins a rematch in NOLA. I really do. But they are obviously the only team that could stay within 15 points of LSU in the title game. Why ask a question you know the answer to?
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News