Started By
Message
re: Possible first-rounder Tim Williams admits to multiple failed drug tests at Bama
Posted on 3/4/17 at 11:38 pm to Robert Goulet
Posted on 3/4/17 at 11:38 pm to Robert Goulet
quote:
38-28
Posted on 3/4/17 at 11:45 pm to Korin
Looks like all the Louisiana boys bama buys are pot heads. Do u pay them in 1/4 ozs too? Is there some special Sabans gold or something
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:10 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
You motherfrickers are literally a FILTHY program.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:41 am to SavageOrangeJug
Alabama beat every one of you while Tim was dominating. Deal with it.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:52 am to SavageOrangeJug
Them Louisiana boys like the chron
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:54 am to SavageOrangeJug
Exactly why they stay at the top. These kids know that Saban has their back in any situation.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 1:22 am to SavageOrangeJug
Compliance is the 13th man at Bammer.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 1:28 am to WhiskeyPapa
Its just funny to me how much the SEC members gave LSU a huge amount of flack for Tyrann Mathieu and now we see that Bama does the same thing. Probably been doing it for a long time.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 4:36 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
You motherfrickers are literally a FILTHY program.
You're on your own with this one. You want to point the finger at Bama, try to come up with something better than weed because nobody gives a frick.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 5:52 am to BamaELCo
quote:
Georgia: 30-percent season suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
Well, this isn't accurate. At UGA, you get a one game suspension after the first failed test, too. Same for Kentucky, I believe.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 5:54 am to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
Its just funny to me how much the SEC members gave LSU a huge amount of flack for Tyrann Mathieu and now we see that Bama does the same thing. Probably been doing it for a long time.
In fairness, Mathieu has admitted thta he quit counting after his 10th failed drug test.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 6:42 am to SavageOrangeJug
What's up with those LA players?
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:24 am to Crimson Wraith
quote:
x-Alabama: 25-percent season suspension, or minimum of 3 games, for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Arkansas: 25-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Auburn: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Florida: 10-percent season suspension for second failed marijuana test, dismissal for second failed test for other drugs.
Georgia: 30-percent season suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
x-LSU: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Kentucky: 30-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Mississippi: Three-game suspension for third failed test, six games or possible dismissal for fourth.
y-Mississippi State: Dismissal for third failed test for all drugs vs. dismissal for fourth failed marijuana test previously.
Missouri: Seven-day suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
South Carolina: 25-percent season suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
Tennessee: Dismissal for fourth failed marijuana test vs. dismissal for third failed test for other drugs.
x-Texas A&M: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Vanderbilt did not provide policy.
Good lord this is embarrassing. As weak as these policies are there is not one team following them. So many examples come to mind including a half suspension for Nick Marshall at AU, Cam Robinson not being suspended at bammer, Tyron Matheiu, Tim Williams, etc. I heard Saban on the radio the other day talking about making his players better people in the community. How the hell is that happening with policies like this? Let's not forget that weed is illegal in these states. These millenial dbags are just being further enabled to do whatever they want and not contribute to society when they "graduate" college. This does not even address the HGH epidemic in the SEC. Bama, Ole Miss, and A&M have huge HGH issues ; LSU/UGA have cleaned there situation up the last few years but still consistent use and AU has a "minor" HGH issue at the moment (had a big problem 10 years ago).
x-Alabama: 25-percent season suspension, or minimum of 3 games, for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Arkansas: 25-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Auburn: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Florida: 10-percent season suspension for second failed marijuana test, dismissal for second failed test for other drugs.
Georgia: 30-percent season suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
x-LSU: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. one-year suspension previously.
x-Kentucky: 30-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Mississippi: Three-game suspension for third failed test, six games or possible dismissal for fourth.
y-Mississippi State: Dismissal for third failed test for all drugs vs. dismissal for fourth failed marijuana test previously.
Missouri: Seven-day suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
South Carolina: 25-percent season suspension for second failed test; dismissal after third.
Tennessee: Dismissal for fourth failed marijuana test vs. dismissal for third failed test for other drugs.
x-Texas A&M: 50-percent season suspension for third failed test vs. dismissal previously.
Vanderbilt did not provide policy.
Good lord this is embarrassing. As weak as these policies are there is not one team following them. So many examples come to mind including a half suspension for Nick Marshall at AU, Cam Robinson not being suspended at bammer, Tyron Matheiu, Tim Williams, etc. I heard Saban on the radio the other day talking about making his players better people in the community. How the hell is that happening with policies like this? Let's not forget that weed is illegal in these states. These millenial dbags are just being further enabled to do whatever they want and not contribute to society when they "graduate" college. This does not even address the HGH epidemic in the SEC. Bama, Ole Miss, and A&M have huge HGH issues ; LSU/UGA have cleaned there situation up the last few years but still consistent use and AU has a "minor" HGH issue at the moment (had a big problem 10 years ago).
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:28 am to TIGERSPIKE
quote:
This does not even address the HGH epidemic in the SEC. Bama, Ole Miss, and A&M have huge HGH issues ; LSU/UGA have cleaned there situation up the last few years but still consistent use and AU has a "minor" HGH issue at the moment (had a big problem 10 years ago).
Please elaborate
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:40 am to SavageOrangeJug
In another stunning development. Bears do shite in woods
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:59 am to TIGERSPIKE
This does not even address the HGH epidemic in the SEC. Bama, Ole Miss, and A&M have huge HGH issues ; LSU/UGA have cleaned there situation up the last few years but still consistent use and AU has a "minor" HGH issue at the moment (had a big problem 10 years ago).
Please elaborate
There is a big board in a medical office in Birmingham that shows all kind of data regarding PED's within the programs in the SEC (excluding Vandy). These are projections and not hard evidence based on screenings, blood work, yearly testing within the program itself (in a nut shell). My company consults with the office once a year regarding the issue of PED's in the SEC and ACC for that matter. This info is then passed to the higher ups in the league offices for their review although they don't and can't hold anyone accountable.
Ex). University of Alabama
1.Football Jr. 257 232 test test test %
^^^This is what you would see on the board. No player name (just a #), class, weight from previous year, weight from this year, then three tests that ultimately show the markers for PED use and finally a % of the likely hood of previous PED use (board only shows players with greater than 50%)
*and by PED I mean anabolic steroids or HGH
Alabama has been hovering around 35 the last couple years. 5 or 6 years ago they were at a 47 which is completely insane. Ole Miss and A&M are at 20 which is very high and LSU is in the teens which they use to be in the 28-30 range from 10 years ago. AU was as high as an 17 approx 10 years ago and now is at an 7. UGA was in the teens consistently and now around a 10. To put that in comparison Clemson has been the highest in the ACC forever and has never been above a 10 and usually at a 5 or so. SEC usually always has at least 10 teams on the board while the ACC may have 2 or 3.
Please elaborate
There is a big board in a medical office in Birmingham that shows all kind of data regarding PED's within the programs in the SEC (excluding Vandy). These are projections and not hard evidence based on screenings, blood work, yearly testing within the program itself (in a nut shell). My company consults with the office once a year regarding the issue of PED's in the SEC and ACC for that matter. This info is then passed to the higher ups in the league offices for their review although they don't and can't hold anyone accountable.
Ex). University of Alabama
1.Football Jr. 257 232 test test test %
^^^This is what you would see on the board. No player name (just a #), class, weight from previous year, weight from this year, then three tests that ultimately show the markers for PED use and finally a % of the likely hood of previous PED use (board only shows players with greater than 50%)
*and by PED I mean anabolic steroids or HGH
Alabama has been hovering around 35 the last couple years. 5 or 6 years ago they were at a 47 which is completely insane. Ole Miss and A&M are at 20 which is very high and LSU is in the teens which they use to be in the 28-30 range from 10 years ago. AU was as high as an 17 approx 10 years ago and now is at an 7. UGA was in the teens consistently and now around a 10. To put that in comparison Clemson has been the highest in the ACC forever and has never been above a 10 and usually at a 5 or so. SEC usually always has at least 10 teams on the board while the ACC may have 2 or 3.
This post was edited on 3/5/17 at 8:00 am
Posted on 3/5/17 at 8:11 am to TIGERSPIKE
quote:
These are projections and not hard evidence based on screenings, blood work, yearly testing within the program itself (in a nut shell).
So it is completely made-up. I also have huge doubts all 28 or 29 sec and acc teams submit this info to one place as well.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News