Started By
Message
re: Per Jones..."No Back flips or somersaults"
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:31 pm to HurdForHeisman1
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:31 pm to HurdForHeisman1
quote:
You're so scared
Terrified. Particularly of the coach with a losing record at his school
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:32 pm to madmaxvol
7-6 is never overachieving for anyone other than Vanderbilt and Arkansas.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:32 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
so these 7 wins was considered overachieving?
Utah State
Arkansas State
Chattanooga
South Carolina in a down year
Kentucky
Vandy
Iowa
Well shite
Damn, that makes the overachieving statement even more embarrassing.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:34 pm to Glorious
Thanks for admitting it, sweetheart.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:34 pm to elposter
quote:
quote: so these 7 wins was considered overachieving?
Utah State Arkansas State Chattanooga South Carolina in a down year Kentucky Vandy Iowa
Damn, that makes the overachieving statement even more embarrassing.
Especially after that national championship we won the year before.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:35 pm to HurdForHeisman1
quote:That's weak. You've got to do better.
Thanks for admitting it, sweetheart.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:35 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
so these 7 wins was considered overachieving?
Utah State - 10-4
Arkansas State - 7-6
Chattanooga
South Carolina in a down year 7-6
Kentucky 5-7
Vandy 3-9
Iowa 7-6
Utah State was probably the best win of the bunch...Still, you play who is on the schedule.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:36 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
quote:
so these 7 wins was considered overachieving?
Utah State
Arkansas State
Chattanooga
South Carolina in a down year
Kentucky
Vandy
Iowa
You have to put it into context, UT has only 8 power 5 wins in the last three years. Three of those wins are over Kentucky, and only one is over a team with a winning conference record.
UT is 8-20 against the Power5 in the last three years. Their eight wins came against teams that combined for a 44-56(19-45) record.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:37 pm to Prettyboy Floyd
Preseason many media predicted that due to us not have a single returning OL or DL and having virtually no Seniors that we could lose to Utah St, South Carolina and Vandy.
The only games everyone predicted us as W's were Ark St, Chatty and UK.
We were better than we should have been.
That is the definition of overachieving.
Now that our team is more experienced, shown they are talented and added even more new talent with a top 5 class the media believes that we can contend for the East title.
So NOW 7-6 would be a massive underachievment.
NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND.
The only games everyone predicted us as W's were Ark St, Chatty and UK.
We were better than we should have been.
That is the definition of overachieving.
Now that our team is more experienced, shown they are talented and added even more new talent with a top 5 class the media believes that we can contend for the East title.
So NOW 7-6 would be a massive underachievment.
NOT HARD TO UNDERSTAND.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:38 pm to UAtide11
quote:
You have to put it into context, UT has only 8 power 5 wins in the last three years. Three of those wins are over Kentucky, and only one is over a team with a winning conference record.
UT is 8-20 against the Power5 in the last three years. Their eight wins came against teams that combined for a 44-56(19-45) record.
Yes, the last 3 years has been horrible...that is why 7-6 was overachieving for this young team.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:38 pm to Ericvol2096
The Vols have a fairly salty schedule. 8-4 and a good bowl game loss against a solid team is nothing to sneer at. Especially since next year is the year that Butch should have all the pieces to the puzzle.
Could they win more? Sure, the Vols have a pretty good amount of talent and are starting to regain what they lost over the years.
8-5 with some close losses to the good teams on their schedule and the Vols are looking solid.
Could they win more? Sure, the Vols have a pretty good amount of talent and are starting to regain what they lost over the years.
8-5 with some close losses to the good teams on their schedule and the Vols are looking solid.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:38 pm to HurdForHeisman1
quote:
23-21
45-42
Posting scores against SC... Butch's two best wins... I think you're confirming Butch's sentiments.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:38 pm to madmaxvol
They need some thing to spice this game up since it'll be the battle of two 4-4 teams.
This post was edited on 7/14/15 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:39 pm to elposter
I wonder if Phil Fulmer every considered 7-6 overachieving? Butch has UT going in the right direction but that was stupid. No, UT does not have the talent they normally do, but I guarantee they had more talent last year than the 2013 vandy team that went 9-4.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:40 pm to Arksulli
I won't be off the Jones bandwagon or anything, I will just think we ever so slightly underachieved.
It depends on injuries and if any of the losses were flukes or not for me to truly form that opinion though.
But here on our SEC Media day when Booger, Joey and Marcus said we are the best East team I'm a bit more ambitious than I will be in September.
It depends on injuries and if any of the losses were flukes or not for me to truly form that opinion though.
But here on our SEC Media day when Booger, Joey and Marcus said we are the best East team I'm a bit more ambitious than I will be in September.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:41 pm to rebsfan10
Played an extremely harder schedule than the 2013 Vandy team played so dumb compairision.
Posted on 7/14/15 at 3:42 pm to rebsfan10
quote:
I wonder if Phil Fulmer every considered 7-6 overachieving?
The three years before Fulmer took over at UT, they went 9-3, 9-3, 9-2-2. The three years before Jones took over at UT they went 5-7, 5-7, 6-7. Apples and oranges.
BTW...if Fulmer had gone 7-6 in 2008, he would probably still be the head coach in Knoxville.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News