Started By
Message
opinion on replay call in Bama game
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:46 am
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:46 am
How could you look at the stop action and say the A&M receiver was in bounds. His foot was clearly out of bounds. That play would have stopped A&Ms TD drive.
10
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:49 am to butchvan
The replay was inconclusive so it would have stood no matter what. It was all about the call on the field for that one.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:50 am to butchvan
I thought he was out too. I'll take the gifts when I can get them.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:51 am to butchvan
Ray Charles could see his toe was on the line.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:51 am to butchvan
Bama had to beat A&M and the refs as usual
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:51 am to AggieDub14
He was out, but the video evidence was not indisputably conclusive, so the call stood. Simple.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:51 am to butchvan
Meh, we got some calls and no calls our way
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:53 am to butchvan
I was surrounded by Aggies last night in a San Antonio bar... they all agreed he was out after watching the replay and video still. If all us drunken average Joe's can see it why can't the refs??
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:54 am to butchvan
Looked like the toe was out but unless they have cameras pointed directly down the sidelines you can't say for sure.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:55 am to RollTideRandall
quote:
I was surrounded by Aggies last night in a San Antonio bar... they all agreed he was out after watching the replay and video still. If all us drunken average Joe's can see it why can't the refs??
The refs missed the call in real time, an easy mistake to make when it's that close. See my previous post for why it was not overturned.
This post was edited on 10/23/16 at 9:56 am
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:55 am to butchvan
He was out, but I'm ok with the call because it was close.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:59 am to Yellerhammer5
I thought it was so extremely close even with zoom in replay that I would rather the player get the play then to look for a couple of white blades touching the edge of his cleat.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 10:07 am to butchvan
Anyone have a screen cap of it?
It certainly looked like half his toe was just across the line...but since his shoes were white, and he was also right on top of a white stripe it was just too tough to say.
Either way I was fine with the call. The video footage wasn't solid enough to say 100%.
It certainly looked like half his toe was just across the line...but since his shoes were white, and he was also right on top of a white stripe it was just too tough to say.
Either way I was fine with the call. The video footage wasn't solid enough to say 100%.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 10:07 am to butchvan
I would not have overturned that call if I was in the booth. If he had been wearing black shoes then maybe you would have been able to tell but in my opinion you couldn't tell for sure. Too close to overturn the call made on the field.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 10:18 am to BamaScoop
There was no way they change that call. It was about as close as you could call it. If they ruled him out originally, the play would've held up. I couldn't see any white grass come up after his foot hit so if he was in, it was by a toenail. Replay was correct in letting the call stand.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News