Started By
Message
re: On Les Miles' loyalty to upperclassmen
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:51 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:51 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
So what you're basically saying is that it's Russell Shepard's time to shine 
2
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:51 pm to Swoopin
Jefferson was safer. METT is more likely to win a game, but looks more likely that he will lose it with a costly turnover or dumb decision.
LSU needed a safe QB to beat every on the schedule except Bama. Cause Bama had a better defense and running game.
LSU needed a safe QB to beat every on the schedule except Bama. Cause Bama had a better defense and running game.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:53 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
So what you're basically saying is that it's Russell Shepard's time to shine
bingo
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:53 pm to KillianRussell
Even if Miles actually DID unfairly favor upperclassmen (even though this myth has been blown up MANY times before) those wacky Rantards act like Miles is the first ever HC to enact such a policy.
Miles favored Jefferson because his only other feasible option was JLee, who sucked. At least Jefferson was better if a play broke down. Neither was a good passer; neither could sit back and read coverage.
They both sucked. They're both gone. Let it go.
Miles favored Jefferson because his only other feasible option was JLee, who sucked. At least Jefferson was better if a play broke down. Neither was a good passer; neither could sit back and read coverage.
They both sucked. They're both gone. Let it go.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:54 pm to BhamDore
quote:
Jefferson was safer. METT is more likely to win a game, but looks more likely that he will lose it with a costly turnover or dumb decision.
LSU needed a safe QB to beat every on the schedule except Bama. Cause Bama had a better defense and running game.
Wow dude, you are actually spot on here.
ETA: except for the better running game by bama...that's debatable.
This post was edited on 4/25/12 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:55 pm to BhamDore
quote:Yeah, because Jefferson never made dumb decisions or had costly turnovers.
Jefferson was safer. METT is more likely to win a game, but looks more likely that he will lose it with a costly turnover or dumb decision
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:55 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Did you see the Ole Miss 2009 game? 2010 Tenn? Yeah, the skeptical fans were way out of line.
I did, and I agree. It's the sudden and very bold reversal that I'm mocking.
This post was edited on 4/25/12 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:56 pm to Sir Yin Yang
quote:
Yeah, because Jefferson never made dumb decisions or had costly turnovers.
Name me one QB who hasn't.
Lets list career pick-6s thrown. I wonder who wins that contest?
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:56 pm to BhamDore
quote:
METT is more likely to win a game, but looks more likely that he will lose it with a costly turnover or dumb decision.
Yes, Jefferson's performance in January completely agrees.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:59 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
At least Jefferson was better if a play broke down
not really, the only thing JJ could do was scramble and hopefully noone was within 10 yards of him, because my grandmaw had better moves than he did.
quote:
Neither was a good passer
Lee was a way better passer, but
quote:
read coverage
was a problem for him.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 12:59 pm to Party At LSU
quote:
BhamDore
Beware of this guy.
Decent troll potential.
FYI
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:02 pm to Smoke Ring
Maybe Mett did not know the playbook
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:07 pm to KennesawTiger
quote:
Miles favored Jefferson because his only other feasible option was JLee, who sucked.
16 TDs, 3 INTs
quote:
At least Jefferson was better if a play broke down.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:09 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Did you see the Ole Miss 2009 game? 2010 Tenn? Yeah, the skeptical fans were way out of line.
i'll give you '09...but the UT game was Crowton. you can't make substitutions with 20 seconds left and no timeouts.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:11 pm to Choctaw
quote:
i'll give you '09...but the UT game was Crowton. you can't make substitutions with 20 seconds left and no timeouts.
Funny, because I was calling for Crowton's head in 2009.
lulz
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:13 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Funny, because I was calling for Crowton's head in 2009.
rumor is...so was Miles after the '09 season. but he was overruled
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:14 pm to Party At LSU
quote:
Yes, Jefferson's performance in January completely agrees.
It was one game. JJ never won the game on his own, but he wouldn't lose it either unless you were playing Bama on January 9th.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:16 pm to Duke
quote:
It was one game. JJ never won the game on his own, but he wouldn't lose it either unless you were playing Bama on January 9th.
not to take anything away from JJs suckiness during that game.....but our o-line wasn't exactly playing stellar either. It was just one of those games where nothing seemed to work....just happened to be the biggest game of the year.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:16 pm to Duke
quote:
JJ never won the game on his own, but he wouldn't lose it either unless you were playing Bama on January 9th.
Look at that gif above. Someone said Mett looks like he'd be more prone to making a dumb decision or a turnover than JJ.
I laugh at that notion.
Posted on 4/25/12 at 1:20 pm to Choctaw
quote:
rumor is...so was Miles after the '09 season. but he was overruled
How the frick could he be overruled.
The only one that could do it would be Alleva.
Regardless, Les should take full responsibility for keeping Crowton on as long as he did.
I also heard a rumor that Gruden was going to be Arkansas next coach.
This post was edited on 4/25/12 at 1:21 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News