Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:09 pm to Henry Jones Jr
I think you're confusing AAC with ACC
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:09 pm to texag7
quote:
Memphis is a power 5 school?
Doesn't matter they would have beat A&M last year
This post was edited on 4/14/15 at 6:11 pm
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:10 pm to texag7
quote:
I think you're confusing AAC with ACC
Nope. The AAC, formerly known as the Big East, is a power 5 conference.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:12 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Then why wasn't the AAC winner in a NY6 bowl?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:12 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Wrong. Under the playoff system the power 5 conferences are the Big Ten, SEC, ACC, Big 12, Pac 12
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:13 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Nope. The AAC, formerly known as the Big East, is a power 5 conference.
1. ACC
2. B1G
3. Big 12
4. Pac-12
5. SEC
The Big East had an auto-bid in the BCS (somehow), but it isn't a P5 conference. It's a G5 conference. And the Big East doesn't even exist anymore, so any former high tier status doesn't count.
This post was edited on 4/14/15 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:13 pm to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
Nope. The AAC, formerly known as the Big East, is a power 5 conference.
ACC, B1G, Big 12, Pac-12, SEC, AAC
That would make it 6
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:15 pm to VagueMessage
quote:
1. ACC
2. B1G
3. Big 12
4. Pac-12
5. SEC
The Big East had an auto-bid in the BCS (somehow), but it isn't a P5 conference. It's a G5 conference. And the Big East doesn't even exist anymore, so any former high tier status doesn't count.
Because they more than held their own in BCS bowls?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:18 pm to texag7
There is a lot of fail going on from multiple sides in this thread.
But I ask. What does it matter if we play a P5 school this year?
But I ask. What does it matter if we play a P5 school this year?
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:19 pm to Korin
Again, they did so somehow, lol.
Their being included into BCS Bowls wasn't due to the fact that they were already playing well in BCS Bowls. They just played their Bowls really well for some reason.
Their being included into BCS Bowls wasn't due to the fact that they were already playing well in BCS Bowls. They just played their Bowls really well for some reason.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:20 pm to texag7
AND we get A&M at home
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:21 pm to SwayzeBalla
For the 3rd time in 4 years
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:21 pm to VagueMessage
quote:
They just played their Bowls really well for some reason.
Probably because most of times they cared a lot more than about that game than the team they were playing against
Ex. Florida vs Louisville Sugar Bowl
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:21 pm to Rebel Land Shark
quote:
This is funny coming from an A&M fan
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:21 pm to texag7
quote:
For the 3rd time in 4 years
You can thank yourselves for that
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:25 pm to Rebel Land Shark
quote:
Probably because most of times they cared a lot more than about that game than the team they were playing against
Ex. Florida vs Louisville Sugar Bowl
I thought about saying this, and it's probably true. Many SEC BCS teams had just narrowly missed out on playing for the NC, so they only competed half-heartedly. But at the same time, this is overused and kind of a cop-out.
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:28 pm to Korin
quote:
They played 2 FCS in the same year.
That's only one
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:29 pm to Hurricane Mike
SMU is worse than many FCS schools
Posted on 4/14/15 at 6:32 pm to Rebel Land Shark
2012 they played 2 FCS schools
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News