Started By
Message
re: Ole miss ranked 11, Lsu 16
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:45 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:45 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Posted by OMLandshark Makes perfect sense, because one was lost over two retarded blunders, and the other was lost thanks to horrifying bull shite. Y'all lost a game by over 30 fricking points. Ole Miss should without question be the highest two loss team in the nation.
Ole Miss lost to LSU because LSU dominated them on both sides of the ball and was clearly the much better team in every way.
The game was only close because LSU got inside the 5 yard line 3 times and got 3 points out of it for various reasons and dropped an INT right in their hands the play before Ole Miss scored their only points.
Game could have been 28-0.
Any Ole Miss fan who says that game was close in anything but score is clueless.
2
Posted on 11/5/14 at 9:59 am to UMRealist
quote:
Disagree to an extent. I still think you can use objective reasoning if two teams have the same record.
another ole miss fan who doesn't understand what the word objective means
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:00 am to lsupride87
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:05 am to Jabstep
quote:
LSU DOMINATED Ole Miss two weeks ago.
Love how we were "DOMINATED" in a 3 point loss @LSU, but LSU was in the game in a 5 point loss at home vs State.
See the hypocrisy here?
This post was edited on 11/5/14 at 10:09 am
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:06 am to KTownRebel
quote:
My point also. You didn't score. Therefore it does not help you that you got some yards and consistently blew it. Why should it?
so why do people want to use the exact opposite reasoning for the LSU/State game? Fact of the matter is, LSU had the ball with a chance to win as the clock expired. If you want to use this logic, that's all that matters, not how the two teams got to that score or what the score was in the 3rd quarter. See how stupid that sounds?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:11 am to Skeeterpop
quote:
But you would complain if it was Miss and Miss St and you had beat them in the Egg Bowl. Correct?
I doubt you would be saying they deserve to be ranked higher because you got beat by 3 TD earlier in the year.
see this is the main thing. ole miss fans will try to justify it because it benefits them. if the shoe was on the other foot, the melt would be unreal.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:12 am to AlaTiger
quote:
The game was only close because LSU got inside the 5 yard line 3 times and got 3 points out of it for various reasons and dropped an INT right in their hands the play before Ole Miss scored their only points.
Game could have been 28-0.
"If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle."
You myopic dumbass.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:13 am to lsupride87
quote:
Well that doesnt make much sense
Actually it does. While LSU did win a slugfest with OM at home, they played poorly in a close loss to MSU at home and got blown out by AU, whom OM loss to on a fluke play. Both teams are right where they should be. Even if LSU wins out, they should stay behind OM if OM wins out, IMO.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:17 am to lsupride87
It matters if you are 1 through 4. If you are 5-7 with some kind of case it may be worth bittcing... but being 11 or 16 is the same thing.
Maybe in a final poll with all games including bowls being played maybe... but this is not that. This committee won't even produce one when all is said and done.
Maybe in a final poll with all games including bowls being played maybe... but this is not that. This committee won't even produce one when all is said and done.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:18 am to OMLandshark
quote:
I can speak multiple languages, am highly educated, and very refined
well no shite, you went to Ole Miss. Aren't those prerequisites? I can't understand for the life of me why people think y'all are pretentious assholes, though...
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:19 am to lsufball19
Why would we want to speak other languages? We speak Merican
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:20 am to AlaTiger
quote:
LSU dominated them on both sides of the ball
Hyperbole.
LSU won the physical battle but the result of game was a toss-up.
41-7 Auburn is domination on both sides of the ball. The scoreboard and box score didn't lie.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:22 am to SouthMSReb
quote:
Love how we were "DOMINATED" in a 3 point loss @LSU, but LSU was in the game in a 5 point loss at home vs State.
I've seen more people say that LSU was dominated by State, but escaped in a fluke upset against Mississippi.
quote:
See the hypocrisy here?
Both ways it works.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:26 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I've seen more people say that LSU was dominated by State, but escaped in a fluke upset against Mississippi.
No IVE seen more people!!!
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:26 am to KTownRebel
quote:
I don't understand why it's irrational to think that the difference in losing by 39 points combines vs 7 points combined out weighs a head to head. Especially when the head to head was by 3 points. Seems irrational to think otherwise. I'm just here to lap up the tears.
Because the playoff committees protocol states that they value head to head and not margin of victory (or defeat), but the rankings do not reflect that thought process at all.
Link
quote:
When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:
Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head-to-head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:29 am to SouthMSReb
quote:
No IVE seen more people!!!
Well, I see dead people!
Check, and MATE!
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:33 am to MoneyShot
quote:Well they have shite all over this then
When circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered:
Championships won
Strength of schedule
Head-to-head competition (if it occurred)
Comparative outcomes of common opponents (without incenting margin of victory)
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:42 am to lsupride87
This level of melt have never before been seen by the patrons of this board. Far surpassing any previous melt and future melts to come.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:51 am to KTownRebel
quote:
Makes perfect sense, because one was lost over two retarded blunders
Dude I hate to break your little already broken heart but we kicked y'all fricking teeth in. If not for our two blunders in the red zone that game would have never been as close as it was
One word......dominated!!This post was edited on 11/5/14 at 10:53 am
Posted on 11/5/14 at 10:52 am to KTownRebel
quote:
This level of melt have never before been seen by the patrons of this board. Far surpassing any previous melt and future melts to come.
I post facts with a link and you ignore it to troll. Shocking.
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News