Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:25 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
Message
Posted by MsGarrison
Save the challenge for later... But the homecooking def is more at BAMA than Auburn
Kurt when? There was like a minute left in the half
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:26 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
Message
Posted by MsGarrison
Save the challenge for later... But the homecooking def is more at BAMA than Auburn
Save it for when? There was like a minute left in the half
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:26 pm to diehardfan
1. It was not a catch, every time they freeze framed it the ball was near his fricking facemask, not even in possession.
2. You're saying the refs are biased beacuse they called such a close play like that incomplete when that would've been called incomplete 90% of the time? GTFO.
2. You're saying the refs are biased beacuse they called such a close play like that incomplete when that would've been called incomplete 90% of the time? GTFO.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:26 pm to MagillaGuerilla
In most places, except bammer, you don't have to ask for a review. But in BDS even if it is reviewed, you don't get it overturned.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:28 pm to tehchampion140
quote:
2. You're saying the refs are biased beacuse they called such a close play like that incomplete when that would've been called incomplete 90% of the time? GTFO.
No, dumbfrick, because it wasn't reviewed.
Eat shite.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:29 pm to UASports23
Every play is reviewed. Why don't people seem to understand that. Auburn took its time on the play and gave the official up in the booth time to look at it, and he deemed it wasn't a catch.
I am assuming that if they review it and said it wasn't a catch, it results in the same uproar. You cannot definitively say by the replay that he had both possession and the foot down in time. Simple.
I am assuming that if they review it and said it wasn't a catch, it results in the same uproar. You cannot definitively say by the replay that he had both possession and the foot down in time. Simple.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:32 pm to LSUMafia
LSUMafia are you still doubting the call on Fairley was horrible.
They just should him again, face on screen, not saying a damn thing.
They just should him again, face on screen, not saying a damn thing.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:34 pm to LSUMafia
quote:
Every play is reviewed.
No it's not. There would be no reason to have challenge flags if this were true. It would be redundant.
Every play can be reviewed, though.
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:36 pm to bmy
can't worry about officials.
We gotta defend the thing known as a forward pass.
We gotta defend the thing known as a forward pass.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:36 pm to gameovergt
quote:
can't worry about officials.
We gotta defend the thing known as a forward pass.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:37 pm to diehardfan
So the barners think Alabama bought the officials......They bought cam so who got the better deal????
Posted on 11/26/10 at 3:54 pm to diehardfan
That is the 4th very bad call all favoring bama.
This is rising to and may surpass refgate 2006.
This is rising to and may surpass refgate 2006.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:00 pm to diehardfan
What you are witnessing is the pecking order. When Alabama teams play out of state SEC teams the Alabama teams get the calls. When Alabama plays Auburn, Alabama gets the calls. It's been that way for years.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:00 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
it was close enough to be reviewed, but the replays showed that he had one hand on it only while his foot was down IB. he didn't actually bring it in (aka possession) before both feet had landed OOB.
what you're claiming is ridiculous. coulda/maybe shoulda been reviewed, but in the end the correct call. i am rooting for AU btw
what you're claiming is ridiculous. coulda/maybe shoulda been reviewed, but in the end the correct call. i am rooting for AU btw
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:51 pm to 90proofprofessional
Not only did 2006 call, but 2004 called and said you are full of shite. Rekicking the extra point because of a penalty that has never been called again in any game.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:55 pm to Daigeaux
I'm going for bama obviously but this is getting ridiculous.
-unsportsmanlike on fairley
-no review of the auburn catch late in 1st half
-now the 4th down spot given to bama half yard farther than McElroy made it
-and again another terrible 4th down spot
This SEC is so fricking corrupt.
-unsportsmanlike on fairley
-no review of the auburn catch late in 1st half
-now the 4th down spot given to bama half yard farther than McElroy made it
-and again another terrible 4th down spot
This SEC is so fricking corrupt.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:55 pm to diehardfan
quote:
That play doesn't get reviewed. That was BS. That was a catch.
You can't count on the replay guy getting it right anyway.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:56 pm to diehardfan
I have never been one to blame a team's performance, or lack thereof, on officiating, but I do think the argument could be made that there is a conflict of interest involving the SEC in their being headquartered in Birmingham.
Posted on 11/26/10 at 4:58 pm to diehardfan
Leave it to a LSU fan to cry about ref bias in a game that LSU doesn't even play in.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News