Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/6/14 at 5:47 pm to tiger4178
quote:
1. Bama
large gap here...
2. LSU
3. A&M
4. Auburn
5. Ole Piss
another gap here...
6. Arkansas
7. Miss St
FIFY
Posted on 2/6/14 at 5:50 pm to GalvoAg
quote:
1. Bama
large gap here...
2. LSU
3. A&M
Even with your superstar offense with Manziel you went 0-2 vs us. LSU is gonna be better on the Defensive side of the ball this year. And we will have growing pains on offense but will be a very good team.
Remember. We got to the national championship with Jordan Jefferson at QB.
You couldn't get there with Manziel.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:01 pm to lowspark12
1) Bama
2) LSU
3) A&M
4) Auburn
5) Ole Miss
6) Arkansas
7) MSU
That's if you go by the recent recruiting rankings anyway. Obviously not everyone pans out, makes it to campus because of grades etc or stays with the team for one reason or another... but it seems like a good best guess to start with IMO.
2) LSU
3) A&M
4) Auburn
5) Ole Miss
6) Arkansas
7) MSU
That's if you go by the recent recruiting rankings anyway. Obviously not everyone pans out, makes it to campus because of grades etc or stays with the team for one reason or another... but it seems like a good best guess to start with IMO.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:02 pm to Tigercoop40
quote:
Remember. We got to the national championship with Jordan Jefferson at QB.
You couldn't get there with Manziel.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:12 pm to Tigercoop40
quote:
Couldn't get there with Manziel
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:39 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
So why is it that any time something ole miss related is compared something aggie related, aggie fans freak out?
Sure makes a lot of ags look insecure
Sure makes a lot of ags look insecure
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:43 pm to lowspark12
Good list.
For those ranking AU lower than 3rd or saying AU is not close to LSU, AU is the only team in the country besides FSU and Bama to have signed 5 straight top ten classes according to rivals. And the last two classes are mostly still intact and attrition has been light recently.
For those ranking AU lower than 3rd or saying AU is not close to LSU, AU is the only team in the country besides FSU and Bama to have signed 5 straight top ten classes according to rivals. And the last two classes are mostly still intact and attrition has been light recently.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:45 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
There is a bigger gap between AU at number 3 and atm at 4 than between AU and lsu as well.
Atm ahead of AU is somewhat comical.
Atm ahead of AU is somewhat comical.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 6:53 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Just averaged 24/7.
Atms ranking over the last 4 years is 16 and it is also 16 over the last 5 years.
AU is number 8 on average.
It isnt even close. And this year AU and AtM basically tied. Only once in 5 yrs has atm signed a higher ranked class. 2014 is a tie on 24/7.
Also, lsu is number 7 on average. Considering how manyjujuniors they had declare the past two years, I am not sure lsu currently has more talent than AU overall.
Atms ranking over the last 4 years is 16 and it is also 16 over the last 5 years.
AU is number 8 on average.
It isnt even close. And this year AU and AtM basically tied. Only once in 5 yrs has atm signed a higher ranked class. 2014 is a tie on 24/7.
Also, lsu is number 7 on average. Considering how manyjujuniors they had declare the past two years, I am not sure lsu currently has more talent than AU overall.
This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 6:57 pm
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:09 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
FWIW people who follow recruiting rankings understand it is an imperfect science and the rankings are probably not that different when considering teams that are similarly ranked.
But if you wanted to look at 24/7 to compare Auburn and LSU over the last four years the rankings would be:
LSU: 298+281+246+277 = 1102
Auburn: 276+252+259+275 = 1062
I probably should have ranked Auburn ahead of A&M in retrospect but A&M being ranked higher the last two years probably skewed my perspective more than it should have. I do like what A&M has done on the recruiting trail in general since their new coaching staff arrived.
But if you wanted to look at 24/7 to compare Auburn and LSU over the last four years the rankings would be:
LSU: 298+281+246+277 = 1102
Auburn: 276+252+259+275 = 1062
I probably should have ranked Auburn ahead of A&M in retrospect but A&M being ranked higher the last two years probably skewed my perspective more than it should have. I do like what A&M has done on the recruiting trail in general since their new coaching staff arrived.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:11 pm to lowspark12
1: Bama
2: LSU
3: Auburn
4: A&M
5: Ole Miss
6: MSU
*Huff* *Heave*
7: Arkansas
2: LSU
3: Auburn
4: A&M
5: Ole Miss
6: MSU
*Huff* *Heave*
7: Arkansas
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:12 pm to EKG
quote:
2. LSU/A&M
No D says otherwise
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:12 pm to Roger Klarvin
Reality check time for Merlins disciples.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:12 pm to lsusteve1
You love the D huh?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:14 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
You love the D huh?
Coming from the gayest school in NCAA....
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:16 pm to NGATiger
quote:
Bama
LSU
Auburn
aTm (still some questions on D even after this class)
Ole Piss
MSU
Arkansas
Le Ole Piss too high.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:16 pm to lsusteve1
quote:
Coming from the gayest school in NCAA....
What does that even mean?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:17 pm to EKG
quote:
What does that even mean?
Oh, deep down, you know exactly what it means
Regardless, A&M is not tied for overall talent with LSU
Posted on 2/6/14 at 7:18 pm to lsusteve1
No, tell me.
Please.
It's fricking ridiculous.
Please.
It's fricking ridiculous.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News