Started By
Message
re: Not looking good for Auburn...
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:54 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:54 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
How do you consider it a "major violation" when nothing but a public reprimand came from it?
When the ncaa says so
1
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:55 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
NYCAuburn --- You listed 2 majors. Bama has 5 four of which are for football. one of which included 10 majors at one time.
I'm still trying to figure out which formula you used to get to 10...
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:56 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
How do you consider it a "major violation" when nothing but a public reprimand came from it?
Because it makes them feel better about having the most major violations in the SEC.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:58 pm to secftw
quote:
Because it makes them feel better about having the most major violations in the SEC.
yes... yes it does...
And they are going for the ALL-TIME record!!
Posted on 7/11/11 at 5:59 pm to NYCAuburn
I still haven't seen a link from the NCAA's website showing anything other than 1995, 2002, and 2009. Regardless, we'll have all this crap behind us in less than a year.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:01 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
The worst offenders weren't even on the football team. Only 6 guys on the football roster, including three on scholarship, were reprimanded.
If you say so, but you might want to re-educate.
quote:
dee said four football players were the worst offenders, obtaining books worth between $2,700 and $3,950. Dee s
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:02 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Look at you Bammers, always wanting a link.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:03 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
If you say so, but you might want to re-educate.
No. You need to educate yourself on the textbook system, which was being used by just about everyone across the country until Alabama's problems with it. Lets just see what comes of Nebraska's current issues.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:04 pm to UAalumnus
quote:
I'm still trying to figure out which formula you used to get to 10...
Umm, that would be the 2002 rulling which bama was caught in a p4p scheme involving 3 different players. The ncaa found them guilty of ten majors along with a bunch on minors.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:04 pm to DonAUfan
...or a press conference?
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:05 pm to DonAUfan
quote:
Look at you Bammers, always wanting a link.
I've never even see the 1964 case brought up in an argument before. It's obvious that Alabama had its problems in the 1995, 2002, and 2009 cases. However, the '64 case was simply a public reprimand. I'm not even sure how it's an argument, other than to split hairs.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:05 pm to DonAUfan
quote:
DonAUfan
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:06 pm to UAalumnus
A Link... or a press conference... ha.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:07 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
No. You need to educate yourself on the textbook system, which was being used by just about everyone across the country until Alabama's problems with it. Lets just see what comes of Nebraska's current issues.
Do you mean the part where you said I was wrong and then proved you wrong. Riiiight.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:09 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I still haven't seen a link from the NCAA's website showing anything other than 1995, 2002, and 2009. Regardless, we'll have all this crap behind us in less than a year.
Go to the ncaa website and search all majors from bama and you will find 5 in your search. Four for football and one for bball
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:09 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Do you mean the part where you said I was wrong and then proved you wrong. Riiiight.
No the part where you were insinuating that the players received money, in duping the old textbook system.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:12 pm to NYCAuburn
And for Au, it shows 7.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:12 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Go to the ncaa website and search all majors from bama and you will find 5 in your search. Four for football and one for bball
This is accurate, however, of the five letters from the NCAA being described as major, only three warranted any sanction whatsoever.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:12 pm to CapstoneGrad06
I applaud the athletes at Bama for scamming the textbooks the way they did. People that had to/have to pay for books in college know exactly how much bullshite that industry is.
Posted on 7/11/11 at 6:13 pm to UAalumnus
Lord knows... BAMA has had its share of boosters with stupidity. I just find it comical that Barners love to spew venom about BAMA being SO dirty when the rest of the nation sees them at the TOP of the corrupt program totum pole. AND they view themselves as being squeaky clean... (see the Chiz 'mission')
It would be like Miami fans of the '80s thinking they are ultra-classy when the rest of the country viewed them as convicts.
It would be like Miami fans of the '80s thinking they are ultra-classy when the rest of the country viewed them as convicts.
This post was edited on 7/11/11 at 6:18 pm
Page 56 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News