Started By
Message

re: No more growth for SEC future expansion?

Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:33 am to
Posted by StopRobot
Mobile, AL
Member since May 2013
15391 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:33 am to
quote:

the sec commissioner is a a&m alumn as well.


Posted by Pinche Cabron
TN
Member since Nov 2015
3639 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:35 am to
IWHI
Posted by CrimsonCrusade
Member since Jan 2014
5150 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:39 am to
quote:

There are no more quality schools in/near our region.


Missouri isn't a quality team and it's not in our region, but they added them anyway. Money is the only thing they consider in expansion, quality be damned.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Let's go to 20 teams


Let's go to 28 teams. Merge the SEC and ACC and have four 7-team pods.

Play your pod and one team each from the other three. All traditional rivalries are put in the same pod so that all teams play everybody else every 7 years.

Winners of each pod play a kick-arse semifinal and final. Winner goes to play-off, wins natty 90% of the time.

Posted by rockiee
Sugar Land, TX
Member since Jan 2015
28540 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:41 am to
quote:

ACC


Posted by ColoradoElkHerd
USA
Member since May 2014
2211 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 9:47 am to
Remove SEC teams and SEC Network checks start bouncing.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13164 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:08 am to
quote:

No more growth for SEC future expansion?
With the ACC league of grants deal and the upcoming Big 12 expansion, it seems like the SEC is stuck for the foreseeable future on expansion.


I don't see it as being stuck. I would rather the SEC remain as is until a natural/not forced opportunity arises. In other words wait for good prospects to come calling rather than making overtures to teams in other conferences that might not pan out.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Yep. Need to go back to 10.


Get rid of Arkansas and Mizzou. frick them.
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27422 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:39 am to
Need to get rid of all secondary teams in SEC states.

Ole Miss: Gone
Auburn: Gone




That would be a good start.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Let us, for the sake of argument, say that we want to expand again for some reason.

Where could we possibly expand?

Well if we absolutely have to get two more teams I think recent history has shown that we'd have little difficulty looting the Big 12. Or we could set up a Hunger Games like fight for survival among American/Conference USA/Sunbelt schools.

Why bother though? Unless Virginia and a major NC school come calling we're already in the back yard of everyplace we could logically expand too.


Ding Ding Ding. We are perfectly situated between the ACC and Big 12 keeping both those conferences marginalized. There is no point in expanding.
Posted by Mizzou59
Mid-MO
Member since May 2016
397 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 11:17 am to
Nothing gets a bunch of rednecks angry like change does
Posted by RT1941
Member since May 2007
30208 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:

With the ACC league of grants deal and the upcoming Big 12 expansion, it seems like the SEC is stuck for the foreseeable future on expansion. There are no more quality schools in/near our region. With the NC, VA, TX, and OK schools covered, it's no where for the SEC to go. As of right now, we are fine. But it is kind of concerning if P5 leagues go to 16 teams in the future.

Posted by restore the roar
Member since Nov 2011
193 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 11:26 am to
Ah yes, another "dump Mizzou" thread. So original and interesting.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Remove SEC teams and SEC Network checks start bouncing.



For now, cord cutting might change that.

I think the SEC won't expand/contract until a new era of television makes a decision obvious.
Posted by Lordofwrath88
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
6857 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 11:43 am to
quote:

But it is kind of concerning if P5 leagues go to 16 teams in the future



No it's not idiot, we don't need 16 teams.
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 4:19 pm to
I think the SEC should pick off the Oklahoma schools, move the Alabama schools to the East and we'd have even 8/8 divisions that are more geographically efficient.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

move the Alabama schools to the East


And Bama says "frick you."

Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

And Bama says "frick you."

Why? I'd love to be in the east.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 4:42 pm to
Because if that was an actual possibility Mizzou would be in the SEC West right now.
Posted by bgator85
Sarasota
Member since Aug 2007
6022 posts
Posted on 7/20/16 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

South Florida is a sleeping giant in football.


I think the on-campus stadium gives UCF the edge long term and they'd be a better get for the Big 12 but dont think either one will get an invite.
This post was edited on 7/20/16 at 4:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter