Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/8/15 at 5:34 pm to Irons Puppet
Who?
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:01 pm to deeprig9
AU and others stacked the box on Chubb, because they knew Mason was not much of a threat.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:02 pm to msbargas
I love my Chubb. Just sayin'.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:26 pm to Shockley03
quote:
It sounds like he mistook Chubb for Fagette and shorted him some stats.
I get the UGA butthurt, but even while Chubb had the better stats, LF7 does have a better tool set.
Chubb was ready from the get go. LF7 was slow to start, unsure of his reads, but as the season progressed, his game is starting to come together nicely. Just slower than expected.
I think you could swap both backs and each school and have very similar numbers respectively right now.
I think LF7 has more room to gorw.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:28 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
I think LF7 has more room to gorw.
Had he started the first 5 games, Chubb would have very likely broken 2000 yards as a freshman. How much more does he need to grow?
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:33 pm to tylerdurden24
quote:
Had he started the first 5 games, Chubb would have very likely broken 2000 yards as a freshman. How much more does he need to grow?
When you look at them physically, yea, LF7 has the better tools.
LSU would waste Chubb just like we waste everything on O minus 2013.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:34 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
When you look at them physically, yea, LF7 has the better tools.
I'm not picking anyone's natural tools over Chubb. Even LF7 (who has great tools).
Posted on 2/8/15 at 6:34 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
When you look at them physically, yea, LF7 has the better tools.
Lol, nope
Posted on 2/8/15 at 8:01 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Yeah, I'm not sure I get why LF's "tools" are so much better than Chubb.
LF is taller.
After that - Chubb has better leg strength, better upper body strength, just as fast (or as close for it to be negligible), better balance, better vision, better acceleration, quicker, and has better lateral movement.
So, what are these better tools you speak of?
LF is taller.
After that - Chubb has better leg strength, better upper body strength, just as fast (or as close for it to be negligible), better balance, better vision, better acceleration, quicker, and has better lateral movement.
So, what are these better tools you speak of?
Posted on 2/8/15 at 8:15 pm to GoldenDawg
These circles are pointless. They are so physically gifted both are insane.
So many fans on both sides take great offense to everything.
For the record, I always said Gurley was better than hill from an ability standpoint (even though it looks as Hill will be the better pro back) and quite honestly, I think Henry will probably have a better year than both.
Im not just some LSU homer, If LF7 was on UGA's team i'd say the same thing.
God forbid people have an opinion different from the UGA fan base.
So many fans on both sides take great offense to everything.
For the record, I always said Gurley was better than hill from an ability standpoint (even though it looks as Hill will be the better pro back) and quite honestly, I think Henry will probably have a better year than both.
Im not just some LSU homer, If LF7 was on UGA's team i'd say the same thing.
God forbid people have an opinion different from the UGA fan base.
This post was edited on 2/8/15 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 2/8/15 at 8:47 pm to JayDeerTay84
quote:
God forbid people have an opinion different from the UGA fan base.
I think it's mainly the LSU fan base that is struggling with this. Your difference of opinion is with the UGA fan base, everyone that voted Chubb Freshman Player of the Year, everyone that voted Chubb first team All SEC, the vast majority of other fan bases, and the stats which clearly show Chubb had the much better season.
So it's not just the UGA fan base you have a difference of opinion with, FWIW.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 8:51 pm to JayDeerTay84
Looks like Hill will be the better pro back? Why don't we at least wait and see who drafts Gurley first. I swear, the only thing LSU fans care about is "potential". 
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:02 pm to GoldenDawg
quote:
So it's not just the UGA fan base you have a difference of opinion with, FWIW.
Well, then so be it.
The thread was titled "No love" they ranked him 3rd. Its not like they ranked the kid last.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:05 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Looks like Hill will be the better pro back? Why don't we at least wait and see who drafts Gurley first. I swear, the only thing LSU fans care about is "potential".
From an LSU perspective with regards to O talent, its not the potential we care about, its the lack of production we witness each year from great players.
Look at OBJ, he had a great year in 2013 for LSU standards, this shite he is doing in the NFL all but makes the point. Do you remember how much it was debated who the top WR's were last year in the SEC?
In any-case, it will all work itself out.
This post was edited on 2/8/15 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:15 pm to msbargas
As it stands, Chubb is the best RB in the nation as far as I can see.
Posted on 2/8/15 at 9:38 pm to Funky Tide 8
But but but but but but what about Leonard's potential?
Posted on 2/9/15 at 1:26 am to Vols&Shaft83
Since Kamara couldn't crack the depth chart at bama you think he's better than henry... Makes sense
Posted on 2/9/15 at 6:51 am to Funky Tide 8
quote:
As it stands, Chubb is the best RB in the nation as far as I can see.
/thread
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News