Started By
Message
re: Nick Saban: "Jonathan Taylor did everything we asked him to do"
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:08 pm to JuiceTerry
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:08 pm to JuiceTerry
Oh I'm just having a conversation.
But what I would personally like to see is a HC not able to give a second chance to someone convicted of a crime.
I'd also like to Saban, Miles, Hugh etc own their mistakes when they give a chance to a kid that didn't deserve it.
Again, do you think Saban would allow his daughter to date a woman beater? Not stating facts. I'm asking your opinion.
I love watching LSU win at sports. But not at the expense of anyone's integrity.
Capstone, it's sad that bama fans will jump to defend Saban on such a clear cut mistake. I know y'all love him and he's tGOAT. But he's capable of making bad judgement calls, and it's not wrong to call a spade a spade.
But what I would personally like to see is a HC not able to give a second chance to someone convicted of a crime.
I'd also like to Saban, Miles, Hugh etc own their mistakes when they give a chance to a kid that didn't deserve it.
Again, do you think Saban would allow his daughter to date a woman beater? Not stating facts. I'm asking your opinion.
I love watching LSU win at sports. But not at the expense of anyone's integrity.
Capstone, it's sad that bama fans will jump to defend Saban on such a clear cut mistake. I know y'all love him and he's tGOAT. But he's capable of making bad judgement calls, and it's not wrong to call a spade a spade.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:11 pm to Patton
You still don't get it. And I really don't want to keep re-explaining shite. But I will say that Saban doesn't have the ability to incarcerate someone, so he can be a little more punitive with his decisions. And also, it's a judges job to decide on second chances. It's not Sabans. He's a football coach.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:11 pm to cas4t
It's easy to call it a bad judgement call after it blows up. If Taylor had a coming to Jesus moment and became a great man with a shady past, would it have been a bad judgement call then?
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:12 pm to cas4t
I see the good and bad of letting guys have multiple chances. It's not cut and dry, black and white. It's defintely gray.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:14 pm to CapstoneGrad06
I thibk it's black and white when it involves domestic violence, unless a judge rules differently. Obviously being charged is different than being convicted.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:16 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
I see the good and bad of letting guys have multiple chances. It's not cut and dry, black and white. It's defintely gray.
This is important to remember.
If the Taylor thing had worked out and he became some beacon of light for the University who owned his past and became a great person - people would praise Saban for his discernment and ability to judge character.
Since it didn't, he's a villain who made a selfish decision.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:16 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Georgia had already given Taylor a second chance. Alabama gave him a third.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:17 pm to Patton
I'll explain it one more time.
It didn't.
It flat out didn't. And in most cases with a crime like DV, it will happen again. That is a fact. Plenty of other players deserve second chances for various crimes or mistakes they've made. But a quick google search would have shown Saban that this was a bad idea. You really think this was about Taylor and second chances and not about winning? If you really think that, then I'm sorry, but I'm done debating with you.
We can play hypotheticals all day but at the end of the day it happened the way it did. There is no room for hypotheticals in a debate where facts have been presented.
It didn't.
It flat out didn't. And in most cases with a crime like DV, it will happen again. That is a fact. Plenty of other players deserve second chances for various crimes or mistakes they've made. But a quick google search would have shown Saban that this was a bad idea. You really think this was about Taylor and second chances and not about winning? If you really think that, then I'm sorry, but I'm done debating with you.
We can play hypotheticals all day but at the end of the day it happened the way it did. There is no room for hypotheticals in a debate where facts have been presented.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:19 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Since it didn't, he's a villain who made a selfish decision.
Which is why he shouldn't have given him a chance in the first place. You weigh the repercussions vs the benefits and make a decision. Unfortunately, successful HCs don't have repercussions so frick it, give the kid a shot.
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:21 pm to cas4t
quote:
I thibk it's black and white when it involves domestic violence,
I disagree. Some cases are black and white and some are not.
Ray Rice would be a clear black and white case.
My best friend from high school got into a heated argument with his fiance at the time. She slapped him in the face and scratched his arms as he was trying to walk away from her. The commotion caused the neighbors to call the cops on them. Cops arrive, ask both of them about the situation, and my friend was labeled the "victim of a domestic violence dispute". Because he had scratches on his arms and he never touched her. Seems kinda petty to me, but she was charged with domestic violence and hauled off.
How about a situation that happened to a co-worker and almost cost him his job two years ago... heated argument leads to this woman slapping him. His reaction is to grab her wrists as she swings at him. He leaves a mark on her wrist, and she falls down in the process. Police show up. He gets pegged with a DV charge because he left marks on her - even though he wasn't the aggressor. Charges were dropped when she gave a statement about the incident in his defense.
Every case is different.
This post was edited on 3/31/15 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:23 pm to cas4t
I don't think it's necessarily a bad notion to have believed anger management, psychiatric evaluation, and community service could help this kid turn his life around.
Though it wasn't selfless by Saban (he was wanting a football player out of it), is this kid better off being shunned from society (and likely continuing to do this) or helped?
Though it wasn't selfless by Saban (he was wanting a football player out of it), is this kid better off being shunned from society (and likely continuing to do this) or helped?
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:23 pm to Tuscaloosa
I think Saban has the ability to figure out if a DV case is legit or not. Taylor's case is very cut and dry.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:24 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
Every case is different.
OK. In this case, Taylor is facing felony charges for punching and choking his girlfriend.
I tend to agree that he didn't deserve a second chance unless he was cleared, which he hasn't been.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:24 pm to cas4t
You can stop the condescending bullshite anytime you want. The only thing you are explaining is that it's easy to judge a decision when you see the outcome.
Great. Doesn't mean there wasn't a chance Taylor could have gotten better.
It was about getting the team better. Just like every other decision Nick Saban makes on a daily basis. You think if Saban knew this kid would continue to hit women he would have let him on the team? He gave a kid a chance. It failed miserably for both parties.
quote:
And in most cases with a crime like DV, it will happen again. That is a fact
Great. Doesn't mean there wasn't a chance Taylor could have gotten better.
quote:
You really think this was about Taylor and second chances and not about winning?
It was about getting the team better. Just like every other decision Nick Saban makes on a daily basis. You think if Saban knew this kid would continue to hit women he would have let him on the team? He gave a kid a chance. It failed miserably for both parties.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:26 pm to Patton
quote:
It was about getting the team better. Just like every other decision Nick Saban makes on a daily basis. You think if Saban knew this kid would continue to hit women he would have let him on the team? He gave a kid a chance. It failed miserably for both parties.
Best summary of where things stand that I've seen so far.
It's easy to throw rocks after the fact.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:27 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:I put tweets from an Alabama writer in the OP. I try not to look at AL.com, and wasn't even aware they had additional quotes. It's not a big deal.
He knew exactly what he was doing when he started this thread and left it the way he did. He could have at least attempted to provide the context or provide direct quotes.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:27 pm to CapstoneGrad06
It's not up to a football coach to change people. He's not educated to do that. There are literally thousands of people who have doctorates who are tasked with that responsibility. Football coaches should coach football, an make sure the players they bring in represent the school in an upstanding way.
Again, would Saban allow his daughter to date someone with a history of DV? Wpuld he try to council that young man and get him help?
Idk. But I can take a pretty good guess.
This was about winning and masked with "second chances". It's an issue at every major program. Successful coaches sacrifice morals for wins because they don't answer to anyone.
Again, would Saban allow his daughter to date someone with a history of DV? Wpuld he try to council that young man and get him help?
Idk. But I can take a pretty good guess.
This was about winning and masked with "second chances". It's an issue at every major program. Successful coaches sacrifice morals for wins because they don't answer to anyone.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:30 pm to cas4t
Can't believe this is even a debate. Saban brought the kid on board because he is good at footballs. There is nothing else to it. Bammers need to stop rationalizing it and embrace the sleaze.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:30 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
I put tweets from an Alabama writer in the OP. I try not to look at AL.com, and wasn't even aware they had additional quotes. It's not a big deal.
Come on, man.
It wouldn't have taken any effort at all to find the rest of Saban's quotes - whether from Twitter or any other source not named AL.com.
Posted on 3/31/15 at 12:32 pm to Patton
No, it's easy to judge a decision when you can make an educated assumption on how it will turn out. It's also easy to just say "no I'm not hiring this guy because he beats women".
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News