Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:09 pm to Patton
It was getting old till the Joe Camel angle, now it's taken on new life.
, beer and a lawnchair man. 
, beer and a lawnchair man. 
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:09 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
Percentages show a statistical comparison between the two that allows them to be on par with each other since you are comparing two different things. Obviously I am not comparing the exact numbers 50.5 and 147.1 and saying one is bigger than the other, but showing what they represent. I am sorry you dont understand
I know you are slow, so I'm going to attempt to break this down to you one more time before I move on to people who are capable of logical argument.
8 pts/game + 8 points = 100% increase in points surrendered.
40 pts/game - 8 points = 20% decrease in points scored
100% =\= 20%
Not an accurate representation of how well each team deviated from their normal play because the defense has an inherently low number to start with whole the offense has an inherently high number.
Thanks for contributing to my thread though. I look forward to your future posts in my threads you stupid taint biscuit.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:09 pm to I-59 Tiger
What you saw in 2013 is what you can expect out of Gus's Offenses in the future. Chizik held him back during his time there to make up for a poor defense.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:10 pm to BamaDoc14
BigBam, is that you?
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:11 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
2-2
These are really the only numbers that matter in this debate.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:11 pm to bona fide
You have no clue what an outlier is do you?
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:12 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
I know you are slow,
quote:
100% =\= 20%
wow I hope you got a doctorate to figure that out
quote:
Not an accurate representation of how well each team deviated from their normal play because the defense has an inherently low number to start with whole the offense has an inherently high number.
quote:
I know you are slow
quote:
you stupid taint biscuit.
Again with the projections. Have you figured out the inherent flaws with your OP yet Math Major Doc?
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:12 pm to NYCAuburn
What's a taint biscuit?
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:17 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
What's a taint biscuit?
Same thing as a cock jockey or a dick dragon??
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:20 pm to BamaDoc14
Gotcha.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:22 pm to BamaDoc14
So I take it you still haven't figured out why percentages are better to use taint biscuit?
I am guessing not since your retorts are childish. Hint, it has to do with what percentage the mean is and the diviations from that.
I am guessing not since your retorts are childish. Hint, it has to do with what percentage the mean is and the diviations from that.
This post was edited on 3/5/14 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:23 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Gus is when 1-0 as a Head Coach vs. Bama. That's the only real stat that matters here.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:24 pm to Weagle25
quote:
1-0
Outlier
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:24 pm to BamaDoc14
quote:
BamaDoc14
You've been melting quite a bit lately
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:25 pm to Weagle25
quote:
That's the only real stat that matters here.
That and the lung cancer prevalence rate among HUNH opponents.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:33 pm to TiggerWoods
quote:
You have no clue what an outlier is do you?
Sure, ever heard of data trimming?
Posted on 3/5/14 at 12:35 pm to bona fide
quote:Yes. What does that have to do with your original statement?
Sure, ever heard of data trimming?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News