Started By
Message

re: Most valuable CFB programs according to WSJ

Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

We sell 9k more season tickets for $90 more


You don't bring in any more football-related revenue than we do -- and are about to be bringing in less.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Where's all those hundreds of millions you love bragging about raising in a single year?


We invested it:



Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:35 pm to
Feel free to explain
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37738 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:37 pm to
Our revenue would be much higher is our fans bought hoodies instead of brooks brothers button downs. State has a natural advantage against us.
Posted by SwayzeBalla
Member since Dec 2011
19451 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:39 pm to
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 2:41 pm to
LINK /

Feel free to show me where we "made up" the $17mil difference that was between us last reported fiscal year. MSU brings in about $12mil total for sports outside of football. That was probably an admitted low point for your football program monetarily coming off of Nutt.

Not at all hard to interpolate that the numbers are going to be very close to identical most of the time -- with us seeing a $7-10mil boost from the opening of our expanded stadium and new ticket prices next year... with you seeing similar in the future once Vaught is expanded.
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 2:45 pm
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 3:53 pm to
Y'all didn't make up that number, but we didn't disclose our private funding when they did that research. We were at 71 million last year an according to Bjork our budget for 14 is 75 million
Posted by CockInYourEar
Charlotte
Member since Sep 2012
22458 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 4:15 pm to
SC moved up from last year, ahead of Ark.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 4:59 pm to
I guess you can come up with all kinds of ways to assess these things. I'm assuming they used numbers from prior to our SEC move or the first year where we received no TV money.

Last year A&M was #6 in revenue and that number is going up in a big way. We raised $750 mill since then between academics and athletics which is more than a lot of public school's endowments. We are dropping $450 mill on the new stadium and millions more on other facilities. We have sold out the new Kyle for 2015 already. The SEC Network money gonna make us all rich too.

If some OU grad in the Big 1G needs to come up with a list to make 'em feel better though that's cool, my jimmies are unrustled.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Not getting into the NPV of bonds for financing capital projects, but we spent more than that re-doing our football stadium.

And I bet you're still using the JFF/pre-Sumlin to NFL discount rate too.

Stick to the CPA you poors
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 5:05 pm
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:08 pm to
This list is garbage
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:09 pm to
Any list that think Arkansas is more valuable than Texas A&M is dumb.
Posted by beaver
The 755 Club
Member since Sep 2009
46861 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:09 pm to
If you take the time to compile the data, I might believe you
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Any list that think Arkansas is more valuable than Texas A&M is dumb.




Seriously, fricking Auburn is #9.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5600 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Any list that think Arkansas is more valuable than Texas A&M is dumb.

Why are y'all so mad?

A > B

B is you

A is us

Don't get mad at facts
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:16 pm to
Facts are we make more money than you and have more success than you and have nicer facilities than you and have a better coach than you and have better academics than you and have better national appeal than you

#facts
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40886 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Any list that think Arkansas is more valuable than Texas A&M is dumb.

Sorry you're poor.
Posted by Latarian
Thug POS
Member since Jul 2010
27604 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Facts are we make more money than you and have more success than you and have nicer facilities than you and have a better coach than you and have better academics than you and have better national appeal than you


I counted like 4 opinions in this post, do they teach what a fact is at your academically elite institution?

or is A&M too poor to offer that sort of class?

lol, poors
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 5:20 pm
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:21 pm to
Arkansas education is nationally mocked and your fans are fatasses with diabetes and AIDS. frick Arkansas
Posted by Gradual_Stroke
Bee Cave, TX
Member since Oct 2012
20917 posts
Posted on 3/17/14 at 5:21 pm to
#facts
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter