Started By
Message

re: More SECN Butt-Hurt

Posted on 8/17/14 at 7:55 pm to
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12273 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 7:55 pm to
Link so I can go have some fun with these sad sacks
Posted by Mizz-SEC
Inbred Huntin' In The SEC
Member since Jun 2013
19236 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

The Big 12's footprint is so small as well. Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, and West Virginia. And they only have 2 football teams that draw national interest. Plus, the Longhorn Network will prevent the conference as a whole from ever having a network. It will eventually be the only Big 5 conference without a network and it is going to be a major competitive disadvantage for OU, Kansas, etc who will have by far the lowest revenues in the Big 5 due to the greed of UT.


It's why Missouri and aTm were fortunate to escape and why the ACC was lucky to (partially) lock down Notre Dame.

Notre Dame was the only available chip that could have kept XII viable, long-term.

The ACC will survive while the XII will eventually implode.
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19208 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 7:59 pm to
I think you're right but I don't know the timeframe in which things will finally set the destruction.

Is it SECN money?
The end of the GOR?
Who knows. Just glad A&M is out
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54628 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:03 pm to
Look what they lost
Nebraska - flagship school and state of Nebraska
Missouri - flagship school and state of Missouri
Colorado - flagship school and state of Colorado
Texas A&M - flagship school and part state of Texas


They got a small religious school in TX and the low population state of WV. As soon as Big Red bolted they should have already lined up Louisville, but they waited even on that and lost them to the ACC. Not like WVU or TCU were going anywhere so they could have added them later as they would always be there. Love or hate the Cards they have multiple sports you can put on a conference network.

Not only did they lose big schools and populations but they lost schools that can fill multiple sports and fill the "middle" of a network. Losing Nebraska may have hurt the most as their fans are pretty "all in" for all the sports Nebraska participates in. They also lost the CWS park to the B1G.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54628 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

Notre Dame was the only available chip that could have kept XII viable, long-term.


Certainly they were a big chip in play but getting the Cards in the meantime left more options open and Boren wanted them early on. The ACC really won as they moved first to get a big chunk of ND and all of UL.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54628 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Link so I can go have some fun with these sad sacks


just google : Land Thieves
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:28 pm to
I think Texas will eventually be forced to end the Longhorn Network and a new Big 12 network would have to either partner with ESPN or buy the rights to UT games from ESPN. OU is not going to sit back and make 25 mil a year while Texas and the rest of the Big 5 schools are pulling in 50-75 mil a year. OU will pull out and join the SEC which would crumble the Big 12. Texas' only long term option if it wants to keep the LHN is independence. No conference, including the Big 12, is going to let one school have its own network while the rest of the conference is losing 20 mil a year due to having no conference network.
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 8:33 pm
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:28 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 8:29 pm
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44016 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

No conference, including the Big 12, is going to let one school have its own network

But that's where you're wrong.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

But that's where you're wrong.



Right now the Big 12 is fine with it, but wait until the new world of college football gets going. Big 5 playing only Big 5, schools forced to pay full cost of tuition plus profit sharing with athletes, and every Big 5 school making 50 million or more on tv revenue except for 9 schools in the Big 12. Some in the Big 12 like Iowa St will bend over and take it because they have no other option. OU will pack up and go though. You can't compete in recruiting while making half the revenue of your competitors. Texas will have to either give up the LHN to save its own conference or go independent.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54628 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

But that's where you're wrong.


I think what he is saying is long term, not just the present

I could see where 4 teams go to the PAC and they get paired networks. Say TX network for tu and TT while OU and OSU or OU and KU get paired in the other one. That seems to be the way the PAC is doing their system pairs united under the main network.
Posted by randomways
North Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
12988 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 9:55 pm to
quote:


its not sabin it's his godfather saliva when he passes Iinto history so will a lot of bamas wins !



I'd ask what the hell you're trying to say, but I'm terrified that you'll actually try to explain in an even more incoherent fashion and the entire conversation will spin out of control in a maddened vortex of illiteracy.

Then rocks will fall, everyone dies.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26248 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 10:11 pm to
It's inevitable that the Big12 will break up...

In the end, we will have 4 16-team conferences...the pac16, the Big10, the ACC, and the SEC.

It's just a matter of time. It's not gonna happen overnight, but everyone knows the end game.

Texas, Baylor, txTech, TCU to Pac12
WestVirginia to ACC
Kansas, KansasSt, IowaSt to Big10
OU/OklSt to SEC

Might be some shuffling with NC and Virginia schools with ACC/SEC, but the bottom line is the Big12 will disperse itself among the other 4 conferences...there are a couple of different ways that "disbursement" could play out, but above is my best guess.

It will all happen at once pretty much and all current Big12 teams will have a home, which will make the GOR irrelevant.
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 10:31 pm
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54628 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

In the end, we will have 4 16-team conferences...the pac16, the Big10, the ACC, and the SEC.


The PAC has a geographic moat so they really don't need to go to 16. They could add Texas and Texas Tech and stop. PAC will not take private religious schools like TCU and Baylor if they would not take BYU. Those 2 probably wind up in a conference with SMU and Rice. If they did go to 16 they could take OU and OSU and create 2 8 team divisions :
PAC 8 "classic" = 4 CA schools, 2 OR schools, and 2 WA schools
PAC 8 "new coke" = 2 AZ schools, 2 TX schools, 2 OK schools, UI and CO

ACC would make ND a full time and add 1 more to get to 16

SEC and B1G could stay at 14 each unless they got 2 really good schools. West Virginia, Kansas State, and Iowa State would not be one of these schools, not would OSU, BU, or TCU.

Keep in mind moving to 4 superconfernces means shrinking the pool not growing it. Basically you have to ask if 2 schools are worth 50 to 100 million each for the B1G or ACC to add them. Realistically Texas is the only must get and it gets marginal quickly after that.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80026 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

t will all happen at once pretty much and all current Big12 teams will have a home, which will make the GOR irrelevant.


All current Big 12 teams will NOT have a home in a power conference. What makes the GOR irrelevant is if a majority vote to dissolve the conference.

Teams with options:

Texas (IF the longhorn network is scuttled)

Oklahoma (If and when Boone Pickens dies or Oklahoma State is taken as a package deal)

Iowa State (AAU school. Big Ten would consider)

Kansas (AAU school and basketball power. Big Ten would consider)

West Virginia (if the ACC wants them)

The other schools are SOL for the following reasons:

Baylor (private religious school with average academics, small fan base, and minimal budget)

TCU (see Baylor, only with less Ken Starr)

Oklahoma State (Boone Pickens is the only thing keeping them tied to Oklahoma)

Kansas State (glorified JUCO)

Texas Tech (see Kansas State)

The current Big 12 is the SWC after the SMU death penalty.

You have more than one private school, 2 "name" schools, a school WAY outside the footprint, and everything else in the same basic geographic area.

To illustrate:

Texas and Texas A&M (SWC) = Texas and Oklahoma (B12)

Baylor, and TCU (SWC) = Baylor and TCU (B12)

Arkansas (SWC) = West Virginia (B12)

Texas Tech, Houston, SMU, Rice (SWC) = Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma State, Iowa State, Texas Tech (B12)

In the end, Houston, SMU, Rice, and TCU were left to wither and die on the vine.

If the Big 12 breaks up, Baylor, TCU, and Kansas State are almost certainly left behind. Texas Tech might survive due to its size and Oklahoma State due to Boone Pickens.
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
13260 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 11:51 pm to
So OU and Oklahoma State are more of a package deal then OU and Texas is? Thats interesting I always thought OU was locked in with the horns more then the pokes. Learn something new everyday.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 8/17/14 at 11:55 pm to
Land Thieves
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 11:57 pm
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 12:08 am to
quote:

So OU and Oklahoma State are more of a package deal then OU and Texas is?
OU can't leave without OSU. Kansas on the other hand can leave and will probably end up in the B1G unless their lawmakers make them take K-State
Posted by olemc999
At a blackjack table
Member since Oct 2010
13260 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 12:24 am to
What are the legal ramifications/punishments if they did leave without OSU?
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8760 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:48 am to
quote:

SEC isn't the best conference this year? Who is better? We have 8 teams in the top 25. Lolz.



There is nothing more useless than preseason polls.

Who gives a shite?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter