Started By
Message
re: Mizzou has had the easiest schedule in the SEC
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:25 pm to reedus23
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:25 pm to reedus23
quote:Well Vandy, UT and UGA.
And who has SC played?
And Nevermind that they are 1-2 against that group. They've had a really tough schedule and ours has been a cakewalk™.
0
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:28 pm to reedus23
quote:
And who has SC played?
Healthy UGA. @UCF. @UT is a tougher game than any Mizzou has played
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:34 pm to CNB
Mizzou is this year's Miss. State. Weren't they 7-0 and top 10 last year?
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:40 pm to Cockopotamus
We won at UCF last year. No one made a banner for us. Don't expect us to get excited for you over that.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:42 pm to BrooksnDunn
Sure. Winning at Vandy and UGA and at home versus UF is the exact same as beating UT, UK and Auburn last year.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
We won at UCF last year. No one made a banner for us. Don't expect us to get excited for you over that.
Is it still 2012? Nope I checked the calendar to make sure, it is in fact 2013. UCF wasn't ranked last year and weren't as good of a team.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:48 pm to Cockopotamus
I just got on google calender to confirm. It is definitely not 2012 anymore but is now 2013.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 7:52 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Is it still 2012? Nope I checked the calendar to make sure, it is in fact 2013. UCF wasn't ranked last year and weren't as good of a team.
They were 10-4 last year. A crippled Missouri team still beat them. So they beat a vastly overrated Louisville team this year. Big deal.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:09 pm to TigerMattSTL
Sure they won 10 games but they played in C-USA last year and lost to Tulsa twice.
I'm not saying they were bad last year but they are significantly better this year.
I'm not saying they were bad last year but they are significantly better this year.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:14 pm to Mootsman
Sour grapes, if I ever heard it.
What will be your excuse if the Gamecocks lose this weekend?
Mizzou just has an easy schedule????
What will be your excuse if the Gamecocks lose this weekend?
Mizzou just has an easy schedule????
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:15 pm to Bogie00
No excuses. I will commend.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:18 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Sure they won 10 games but they played in C-USA last year and lost to Tulsa twice. I'm not saying they were bad last year but they are significantly better this year.
If you want to hang your hat on beating an AAC program, be my guest. But that isn't saying much.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:19 pm to Mootsman
quote:
No excuses. I will commend.
Great! Should Mizzou win, I look forward to your congratulatory post.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:23 pm to TigerMattSTL
quote:
If you want to hang your hat on beating an AAC program, be my guest. But that isn't saying much.
Considering they will probably win out and make a BCS bowl berth it says way more than Mizzu's win over UCF in 2012
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:33 pm to Cockopotamus
I doubt it. Winning by 3 against Penn St and 6 against Memphis St doesn't scream "win out the rest of the season."
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:33 pm to Bogie00
Should you lose I look forward to you accepting the validity of the OP.
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:34 pm to Mootsman
It will be true either way. Amirite?
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:37 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Healthy UGA. @UCF. @UT is a tougher game than any Mizzou has played
What's with this "healthy" and "injured" shite. We can play that game. If Mizzou was healthy last year, they would have wrecked the SEC East. I mean nobody mentioned Mizzou's injury for the reason they went 2-6 or whatever in the SEC. But let Mizzou be healthy and others injured we run to that injury bs.
People laughed at the injured Mizzou. Have your backup OL, RB, hurt QB playing and see how far that gets ya. But let some teams have a hurt RB's and WR's it's the end of the world. They still have a healthy OL right, healthy QB right?? Loaded with 4-5* recruits while lil ol Mizzou had 2-3*. So the 4-5* backups from these SEC powers should be able to hang with Mizzou's starters right??
Where's that muthafrickin depth people talked shite about last season when referring to Mizzou??? No depth, no depth, need depth in the SEC. Easy to talk that shite when you're healthy huh.
This post was edited on 10/24/13 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 10/24/13 at 8:54 pm to Mootsman
quote:
Should you lose I look forward to you accepting the validity of the OP.
Good luck with that, pal. You started the snarky thread, not me. If Mizzou were to lose, their record would be 7-1 and still be sole leader in the East.
Honestly, I might expect some one in the west division to claim we have an easy schedule......dude, we are playing the same teams.
I laugh at the hypocrisy on this board!
Posted on 10/24/13 at 9:20 pm to RocketBallz
quote:
OP is right, and it only gets easier this week.
Did not read past this
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News