Started By
Message
re: Mizzou Admits They F*cked Up Sexual Assault Case of Student Athlete
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:55 pm to arrakis
Posted on 4/15/14 at 8:55 pm to arrakis
quote:
They've ADMITTED negligence you ignorant frickwit.
The only thing left is the amount of the check.
Serious question; are you really so fricking stupid you think this won't cost the school?
Since you're so smart, please explain how this negligence resulted in damages to the family and what these damages are.
0
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:04 pm to arrakis
quote:
They've ADMITTED negligence you ignorant frickwit.
Be honest, did you even read the report?
If you had, you wouldnt be calling people a "frickwit" for calling you out.
Usually the loudest ad hominems come from the biggest dolt in the discourse.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:15 pm to kilo
The girl who committed suicide claimed she told an academic adviser that she was raped/sexually assaulted.
But she made the call from a restaurant and the academic adviser claimed she couldn't hear clearly because those damn restaurants are just so loud and modern cell phone technology is basically a string and two tin cans.
Plus, the academic adviser denied hearing about the rape/sexual assault and there's no way that she made that denial to protect her own arse or the University's collective arse after the girl committed suicide.
Luckily, the academic adviser never followed up or asked any further questions about her student.
Case closed guys.
But she made the call from a restaurant and the academic adviser claimed she couldn't hear clearly because those damn restaurants are just so loud and modern cell phone technology is basically a string and two tin cans.
Plus, the academic adviser denied hearing about the rape/sexual assault and there's no way that she made that denial to protect her own arse or the University's collective arse after the girl committed suicide.
Luckily, the academic adviser never followed up or asked any further questions about her student.
Case closed guys.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:20 pm to JDHLaw
Kinda sorta. If you were very drunk when you read it.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:21 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
The girl who committed suicide claimed she told an academic adviser that she was raped/sexually assaulted.
But she made the call from a restaurant and the academic adviser claimed she couldn't hear clearly because those damn restaurants are just so loud and modern cell phone technology is basically a string and two tin cans.
Plus, the academic adviser denied hearing about the rape/sexual assault and there's no way that she made that denial to protect her own arse or the University's collective arse after the girl committed suicide.
Luckily, the academic adviser never followed up or asked any further questions about her student.
Case closed guys.
Its story time apparently.
Can you tell me about the time Cal had to vacate final fours and stuff next?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:28 pm to JDHLaw
I sense a little sarcasm in your post. Obviously a cell phone call to your academic adviser is the correct way to report a rape (way after the supposed occurrence when she was living in a completely different city, nonetheless). Furthermore, I find it really hard to believe that a female adviser would knowingly ignore an allegation of rape from another female, and put her own career on the line in addition to facing possible criminal charges to protect a football player that she has zero connection to, but don't let that stop your shitty attempt at being a douchebag and fitting the profile of the kind of scum that is involved in the "law" profession.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:31 pm to kilo
quote:
Its story time apparently.
Did you even read the report?
It's undisputed that a 9 minute phone call took place between Courey and Anderson on May 12, 2011.
Courey detailed the conversation in her diary and discussed the conversation with her therapist at McLean Hospital the next day. Her therapist made notes concerning the conversation and the therapist's conclusion (from her notes) was that the conversation being discussed concerned the rape.
The investigation found no evidence that Courey fabricated her diary entry.
The investigation, interestingly, did not find that Courey failed to report the rape to Missouri employees or officials. It found only that the evidence did not permit a definitive conclusion that she did.
The evidence that Courey reported:
1. Her diary entry
2. Her therapist's notes
The evidence that Courey did not report:
1. Anderson denied hearing the specific words "rape" or "sexual assault"
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:35 pm to roadhouse
quote:
I sense a little sarcasm in your post. Obviously a cell phone call to your academic adviser is the correct way to report a rape (way after the supposed occurrence when she was living in a completely different city, nonetheless). Furthermore, I find it really hard to believe that a female adviser would knowingly ignore an allegation of rape from another female, and put her own career on the line in addition to facing possible criminal charges to protect a football player that she has zero connection to, but don't let that stop your shitty attempt at being a douchebag and fitting the profile of the kind of scum that is involved in the "law" profession.
I'm on your side, man. If a rape isn't reported the right way, it was never a rape at all. If you tell the wrong person about a rape, it's like it never happened.
Same thing with reporting it later. You wait too long to report it, no rape actually happened.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:36 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
Did you even read the report?
Actually, yes, I did read the report.
Its interesting the weight you give to certain aspects and the easy dismissal given to other aspects inside that report.
Almost like you are being biased, forming your own narrative to fit said bias.
Has anyone told you you seem a lot like Cheese Grits?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:39 pm to kilo
I'll bite:
What are the aspects I've dismissed and what are the aspects I'm giving undue weight to?
What are the aspects I've dismissed and what are the aspects I'm giving undue weight to?
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:40 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
(No message)
Probably the least biased thing you posted in this thread.
Congrats.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:41 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
I'm on your side, man. If a rape isn't reported the right way, it was never a rape at all. If you tell the wrong person about a rape, it's like it never happened.
I find issues like this one are a boon to the board because it separates normal trolls from extraordinary trolls.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:47 pm to kilo
quote:
Has anyone told you you seem a lot like Cheese Grits?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:50 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
What are the aspects I've dismissed and what are the aspects I'm giving undue weight to?
Well its a specious jump to accuse that woman of lying to protect herself and a university she isnt even employed by anymore.
The fact your whole premise and narrative relies on that while completely ignoring the fact that the report clearly states there is no proof that there was contact with university personal outside of medical professionals.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:55 pm to kilo
quote:
he fact your whole premise and narrative relies on that while completely ignoring the fact that the report clearly states there is no proof that there was contact with university personal outside of medical professionals.
No, you're wrong.
The report does not say that "there is no proof that there was contact with university personal [sp] outside of medical professionals."
In fact, the report details two pieces of evidence (or proof) that there was contact with university personnel outside of medical professionals.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
The second is the therapist's notes and revelation that the therapist's conclusion was that the conversation between Courey and Anderson involved the rape.
To rebut these two pieces of evidence, you have Anderson's statement that she did not recall, specifically, the words "rape" or "assault." She recalled being told that "bad things happened."
Adding these together, you get the real finding: No definitive conclusion, which is much different than "no proof."
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:02 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
Adding these together, you get the real finding: No definitive conclusion, which is much different that "no proof."
This is correct.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:06 pm to JDHLaw
quote:
No, you're wrong.
Meh, if you say so Grits.
quote:
n fact, the report details two pieces of evidence (or proof) that there was contact with university personnel outside of medical professionals.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
The second is the therapist's notes and revelation that the therapist's conclusion was that the conversation between Courey and Anderson involved the rape.
Ok, then why this finding?
quote:
No definitive conclusion
Like I" said, you are giving far more weight to certain aspects then you are with others.
An independent investigation wasnt willing to call Anderson a "liar" but you sure are and with that is the basis for your soapbox ITT.
Give it a rest Grits.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:07 pm to JDHLaw
quote:Yes and the account was Anderson had no reaction.
The first is Courey's detailed diary entry reciting the fact that she informed Anderson she was raped and giving an account of Anderson's reaction.
Anderson also stated that Courey said she didn't want to come back becuase 'bad things happened to me'. Anderson assumed that meant the attempted suicides, which given that she had not heard about anything else is a pretty reasonalbe assumption.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:08 pm to kilo
quote:
No definitive conclusion
I was getting ready to say if he acknowledges this finally, why is he on this like stink on shite?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:10 pm to Mizzou4ever
quote:
I was getting ready to say if he acknowledges this finally, why is he on this like stink on shite?
Because Mizzou that's why
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News