Started By
Message
re: Mallett moves up on depth chart. Patriots release Crompton.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:14 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:14 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
If he stayed at Michigan he would have never seen the field
Not really the point....
2
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:17 pm to Draconian Sanctions
ya missed that one.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:26 pm to Draconian Sanctions
not that i pay any real attention to the draft... i just feel like he's at minimum a big gamble. i was shocked that the pats, in no need of gambling, drafted him. w/e, i mean... like someone said, we'll all see how it plays out :)
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:26 pm to I Bleed Garnet
He had what they called the "play of the day" at yesterday's practice...50 yard bomb down the sideline. Im actually excited to watch preseason for once to see how he does
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:28 pm to m2pro
quote:
i just feel like he's at minimum a big gamble. i was shocked that the pats, in no need of gambling, drafted him.
That sentence says exactly WHY the Pats drafted him.
They don't need a QB now but he's a big gamble that has tremendous potential if he can get his shite together. Risk/Reward for them. Low risk pickup with the potential for high reward.
The kid is ridiculously good when it comes to x's and o's. He just needs to get his shite straight off of the field. He stays out of trouble and literally keeps his nose clean then NE is probably the best spot for him.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:28 pm to m2pro
I feel for where he was picked he's not a huge gamble.
This post was edited on 8/1/11 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:29 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
If he stayed at Michigan he would have never seen the field
Who? Mallett?
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:29 pm to m2pro
quote:
not that i pay any real attention to the draft... i just feel like he's at minimum a big gamble. i was shocked that the pats, in no need of gambling, drafted him. w/e, i mean... like someone said, we'll all see how it plays out :)
This is a franchise that just traded for Albert Haynesworth and Ochocinco and you think using a 3rd round pick on Ryan Mallett is a "big gamble" in their eyes?
This post was edited on 8/1/11 at 11:30 pm
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:29 pm to Woopigsooie20
yes
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:30 pm to Woopigsooie20
This comment made me laugh.
quote:
Since two of the four voided contracts are with the Pats, I’m guessing it’s because they’re not permitted to appear in the Patriots taping of the opposing team’s offensive signals.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:30 pm to m2pro
quote:
am I the only guy that thinks Mallett isn't intelligent enough to handle the pro's?
You won't find many more people who are more football smart than Mallett.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:31 pm to reb13
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:33 pm to I Bleed Garnet
In Rich Rodriguez system he wouldn't have, no.
If Lloyd Carr stayed he would have been a 3+ year stater.
You do realize he played in 11 games as a True Freshman, right?
If Lloyd Carr stayed he would have been a 3+ year stater.
You do realize he played in 11 games as a True Freshman, right?
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:36 pm to Woopigsooie20
Yes I do, but Lloyd Carr retired and he left Michigan because Rich Rod came in.
why I said, if he stayed at Michigan he never would have seen the field. (I should have added again)
why I said, if he stayed at Michigan he never would have seen the field. (I should have added again)
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:39 pm to I Bleed Garnet
Oh, I agree, he wouldn't have played in Rich Rod's offense.
And of course, he knew that and moved on.
And of course, he knew that and moved on.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:41 pm to Woopigsooie20
ya someone said something about if he stayed at Michigan he would be on the Bengals and I clearly missed the point there.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:42 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
ya someone said something about if he stayed at Michigan he would be on the Bengals and I clearly missed the point there.
The point is that going from Arkie to the Pats is a lot better of a set up for a QB than going from where he was (Michigan) to being picked by some sad sack franchise (Bengals), a clear juxtaposition.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:45 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Precisely. Considering that knocks that so many supposed insiders had on him there really isn't a better place than he can be. A system that doesn't need a QB in the near future and is already familiar with and successful with utilizing a slow, big armed QB. You really couldn't ask for a better fit given the circumstances Mallet put himself in.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:53 pm to Choctaw Hog
From the Mallet Caption thread
Uh no bro I don't want to be friends. I struggle with goodbyes.
Uh no bro I don't want to be friends. I struggle with goodbyes.
Posted on 8/1/11 at 11:55 pm to Draconian Sanctions
ya i know I missed that one and read it too quickly.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News