Started By
Message

re: LSU sports don't always live up to expectations, but they never hit rock bottom

Posted on 6/8/16 at 8:50 am to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Year before last, we lost to MSU That is as rock bottom as you can get.

Meh, Miami (Ohio), So. Miss, Houston, UAB, those were all worse.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66417 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 8:57 am to
quote:

They have the whole state counting on them (minus NOLA). It's a lot of pressure.


It must be such a relief not having your whole state root for you.
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33961 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 9:38 am to
quote:

They have the whole state counting on them (minus NOLA).
what in the actual frick?
Posted by Serraneaux
South of 30a
Member since Mar 2014
19615 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 9:39 am to
Yes 2-9 in the early 90s wasn't that bad.
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33961 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 9:39 am to
quote:

NOLA is a Saints town first, LSU second. And don't forget Tulane.

I grew up in New Orleans, the Tigers there ain't what they are in Lake Charles or north shore even.



you can't be serious. first off, pro sports teams and college sports teams are different things. NOLA is as pro LSU of a town as there is in the state
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
20974 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:22 am to
quote:

LSU sports don't always live up to expectations, but they never hit rock bottom


The 1990's says hello....
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:22 am to
quote:

you can't be serious. first off, pro sports teams and college sports teams are different things. NOLA is as pro LSU of a town as there is in the state



Not true. While they will still follow the sporting events at LSU, they will first spend their money on the pro sport and the pro sport will be "their team". Of course you will have some that closely follow both and some that will only follow college sports instead of the pro team, but as a general rule, college sports is less popular in towns that have the equivalent pro sports team.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I generally agree, however, Tennessee is a good case study on this matter. A Top 10 program like UT dropping so low just seems so improbable.


They don't have a fraction of the instate talent and have a ton more schools with a recruiting presence in Tennessee.

This is a terrible comparison.
Posted by Old Money
Member since Sep 2012
36333 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 11:40 am to
quote:

don't have a fraction of the instate talent and have a ton more schools with a recruiting presence in Tennessee.

This is a terrible comparison.




Not at all. Difference between the talent is while everyone may recruit both states, LSU just has a more established in-state network that keeps the kids they want. It's pretty amazing.

We saw what happened when bad coaching an not a big emphasis on recruiting LA took over at LSU.
This post was edited on 6/8/16 at 11:41 am
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33961 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Not true. While they will still follow the sporting events at LSU, they will first spend their money on the pro sport and the pro sport will be "their team". Of course you will have some that closely follow both and some that will only follow college sports instead of the pro team, but as a general rule, college sports is less popular in towns that have the equivalent pro sports team.
the dude said LSU does not have support from NOLA because it is a Saints town. That is a laughable statement. Go into any bar in NOLA on a game day, and they will all be full of tiger fans. I-10 is full of cars travelling from NOLA to BR on game day. Just because NOLA has the Saints does not in any way have any bearing on the fact that NOLA is a pro LSU town. His comment got even more ridiculous when he brought up Tulane
Posted by AshLSU
Member since Nov 2015
12868 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 2:55 pm to
It's a large population town. I would say that it is first a Saints town then an LSU town. To say that there are hardly any fans of LSU in New Orleans is absurd though.
Posted by Guess
Down The Road
Member since Jun 2009
3768 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 4:40 pm to
The Saints are as much part of New Orleans as anything, so they are first in most people in the Metro's heart, but that doesn't mean LSU football doesn't get A LOT of support.

Although the Pelicans fanbase is getting better, they are nowhere near established like the Saints, and LSU basketball is a lot closer to the pro team if not more important to most people. Of course LSU baseball is way over the Zephyrs to most people in NO.
Posted by MetryTyger
Metro NOLA, LA
Member since Jan 2004
15580 posts
Posted on 6/8/16 at 4:47 pm to
+1
And what they don't seem to get, AGAIN, is that the population of the 'City' or, Orleans Parish if you will, is """""ONE THIRD"""""
the size of the Metro New Orleans area.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter