Started By
Message
re: LSU-Mizzou 2013: Who wins and why?
Posted on 8/2/14 at 3:11 pm to wadewilson
Posted on 8/2/14 at 3:11 pm to wadewilson
quote:
We would have worked Mizzou over in Baton Rouge. Weak, undersized line would have did them in.
yea I didn't see you in ATL last year,, too bad you couldn't make it!
some stats from that game:
309: Average weight on Mizzou starting line.
303.3: Average weight on Auburn starting line.
This post was edited on 8/2/14 at 3:12 pm
1
Posted on 8/2/14 at 4:15 pm to kilo
quote:
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest.
Common opponents/transitive property arguments are weak no matter who is on what side.
The UGA team that beat LSU was vastly different than the UGA team that Mizzou beat. Just like the Auburn team that LSU corn holed was different than the Auburn team that beat Mizzou.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 5:01 pm to RidiculousHype
LSU lost to a healthy Georgia. LSU lost to a depleted Ole Miss.
Missouri beat an unhealthy Georgia, yes. What about Ole Miss?
LSU was Auburn's 4th game; they had a new coaching staff and were still shaking off the aftereffects of a 3-9 season. Missouri was Auburn's 13th game. It's not fair to compare the results of games that were about 2 months apart. Auburn fans have posted that their offense thrives in a dome, see the 2010 SEC Championship. Auburn was firing on all cylinders especially after knocking off the two-time defending national champions in historical fashion the previous week; that team was high. Auburn hadn't even made their identity when they played LSU; they weren't playing Top 10 football then.
Missouri beat an unhealthy Georgia, yes. What about Ole Miss?
LSU was Auburn's 4th game; they had a new coaching staff and were still shaking off the aftereffects of a 3-9 season. Missouri was Auburn's 13th game. It's not fair to compare the results of games that were about 2 months apart. Auburn fans have posted that their offense thrives in a dome, see the 2010 SEC Championship. Auburn was firing on all cylinders especially after knocking off the two-time defending national champions in historical fashion the previous week; that team was high. Auburn hadn't even made their identity when they played LSU; they weren't playing Top 10 football then.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 5:27 pm to Mohican
quote:
The ONLY team last year with a running game worth a damn that Mizzou played was Auburn. I said all year, as soon as Mizzou plays a team that will run right at them it will expose their stunting, aggressive but undersized line. That played out against Auburn finally because Auburn was the only team capable of doing that whom Mizzou played.
Funny you don't know shite about Mizzou, Mizzou hardly ever stunted the front 4 put on pressure which was the key to its success. Auburn took advantage of the over aggressive up field attack of the line not stunts. Come back when you know what you speak of.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 5:51 pm to Tackle74
Auburn's offense has pretty close to nothing in common with LSU. Not sure why that's even being brought up in a "matchups" argument.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 7:49 pm to Jagd Tiger
quote:
yea I didn't see you in ATL last year,, too bad you couldn't make it!
Right, the game Mizzou lost to the team LSU beat.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News