Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:59 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
this. The common opponent argument is pretty weak
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest.
I dont know if LSU would beat Mizzou or not but the fricking cajun tinged nonsense that they would beat Mizzou by "2 scores" is just flat pathetic.
Thats the only thing I was really arguing.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:10 am to kilo
It's a pretty weak argument no matter who it favors
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:11 am to kilo
If you think they're bad just wait for lil bro auburn
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:25 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
It's a pretty weak argument no matter who it favors
So the OP was weak? I agree.
One team was 5-3 and the other was 7-1 and playing in Atlanta.
Really nothing more to see here than LSU fans crying about "what could have been" and hashing out how the schedule was against them somehow.
This post was edited on 8/2/14 at 2:29 am
Posted on 8/2/14 at 2:35 am to hg
quote:
Mett & Hill would have lit their arse up.
lulz. Considering Mett would have been on his arse with regularity.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 4:05 am to Mizz-SEC
The ONLY team last year with a running game worth a damn that Mizzou played was Auburn. I said all year, as soon as Mizzou plays a team that will run right at them it will expose their stunting, aggressive but undersized line. That played out against Auburn finally because Auburn was the only team capable of doing that whom Mizzou played.
LSU with Hill would have run right at Mizzou and eventually had great success, giving Mett, ODB and Landry the opportunity to torch them over the top. They torched everybody all year.
Comparing our one hiccup game against a historic rivalry that always plays us tough and a Georgia team at full strength doesn't tell the whole story. Transitive property never works.
Not saying it wouldn't have been a good game, but I would have loved the matchup in our favor, just based on style of play. I don't think Mizzou saw a defense anywhere close to ours all year either.
LSU with Hill would have run right at Mizzou and eventually had great success, giving Mett, ODB and Landry the opportunity to torch them over the top. They torched everybody all year.
Comparing our one hiccup game against a historic rivalry that always plays us tough and a Georgia team at full strength doesn't tell the whole story. Transitive property never works.
Not saying it wouldn't have been a good game, but I would have loved the matchup in our favor, just based on style of play. I don't think Mizzou saw a defense anywhere close to ours all year either.
This post was edited on 8/2/14 at 4:07 am
Posted on 8/2/14 at 7:58 am to Pelican fan99
quote:
why are you leaving off the auburn game?
doesn't fit his argument
Posted on 8/2/14 at 8:27 am to kilo
quote:
Its only weak when it doesnt lean your way. Be fricking honest. I dont know if LSU would beat Mizzou or not but the fricking cajun tinged nonsense that they would beat Mizzou by "2 scores" is just flat pathetic. Thats the only thing I was really arguing.
I don't know about pathetic. Our defense feasts on offenses like Mizzous. Do not look to Ole miss as an example. They are always an outlier with us and that game is always close regardless.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 8:44 am to BreakawayZou83
quote:
I'll stay out of this LSU circlejerk. You guys would suck your own dicks if you could.
Says the guy who had a team captain come out of the closet.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 9:02 am to RidiculousHype
I agree with your line predictions. Mizzou was good and had a special team last year. They wouldve presented us a great challenge without a doubt.
Why Mizzou and not a different team?
Why Mizzou and not a different team?
Posted on 8/2/14 at 9:53 am to LSUANDY25
I don't really care who "would have" won last year but definitely excited to go down to Baton Rouge for the game in 2016! As for Tennessee just... 
Posted on 8/2/14 at 11:14 am to JesusQuintana
quote:
UT fans are cute.
quote:
Hopefully we meet in ATL
Not how it works.
Mizzou fans are the best thing to ever happen for aTm fans.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 11:15 am to kilo
quote:
You were 0-2 vs common opponents while Mizzou was 2-0
I thought y'all played Auburn too?
Posted on 8/2/14 at 11:46 am to kilo
quote:
You were 0-2 vs common opponents while Mizzou was 2-0.
This is factually incorrect. READ THE OP.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 12:19 pm to RidiculousHype
Let me answer this in the carefully reasoned style of an LSU fan.
Mizzou wins, 127 - 0
Mizzou wins, 127 - 0
This post was edited on 8/2/14 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:18 pm to OceanMan
Again, I was talking about LSU
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:36 pm to BASED
quote:
Who wins
lolololol
mizzou should not even be mentioned in the same sentence as LSU
Posted on 8/2/14 at 1:46 pm to RidiculousHype
We would have worked Mizzou over in Baton Rouge. Weak, undersized line would have did them in.
It would have looked like the LSU-Auburn game.
It would have looked like the LSU-Auburn game.
Posted on 8/2/14 at 3:00 pm to UncleBlazer
quote:
LSU did not look good on the road last year. Blow out loss to Bama, loss to Ole Miss(lulz), defense was awful at UGA, and even looked vulnerable against State.
Agreed
quote:
I don't really care who "would have" won last year but definitely excited to go down to Baton Rouge for the game in 2016! As for Tennessee just...
You will have a blast
This post was edited on 8/2/14 at 3:01 pm
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News