Started By
Message
re: LSu fans = Okie Lite shills
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:04 am to lsutiger4life
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:04 am to lsutiger4life
The degree to which some LSU fans are invested in this is actually pretty insulting to Oklahoma St.
I've never seen anything like it.
I've never seen anything like it.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:06 am to wm72
quote:
The degree to which some LSU fans are invested in this is actually pretty insulting to Oklahoma St.
I've never seen anything like it.
The degree to which gumps don't realize that it's ok to discuss other options other than an LSU/Bama rematch is insulting to everyone.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:06 am to lsutiger4life
This is why no one wants to GIVE Bama anything. Fans like you who should be thankful are full of arrogance. Only your fan base would ignore a loss at home and claim the world fears you. Y'alls team is awesome, your fans on the other hand suck. By the way, I can't wait to see LSU beat your asses again next year!!!!
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:12 am to SabanIsAGod
You missed your kicks on route 9 to 6.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:13 am to WoWyHi
Thanks to Stanford winning last week, it is pretty much a done deal. Va Tech winning this weekend seals the deal. Now prepare to get your arse whipped in the Dome by a superior team on Jan. 9th.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:13 am to los angeles tiger
quote:
You missed your kicks on route 9 to 6.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:14 am to WoWyHi
quote:
The degree to which gumps don't realize that it's ok to discuss other options other than an LSU/Bama rematch is insulting to everyone.
You know as well as I do that what's happening on this board has precious little to do with "other options."
Is anyone really fooled into thinking that it has to do with anything other than which team LSU fans think they have the best chance to beat.
I'm sure every other fan base would have people doing the same thing however that doesn't mean that I wouldn't be a bit pissed about it if I were an Oklahoma St fan.
The ones who want Oklahoma St so desperately better hope the poll voters don't feel the same way they do about the difference between the two teams.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:15 am to SabanIsAGod
quote:
Thanks to Stanford winning last week, it is pretty much a done deal. Va Tech winning this weekend seals the deal. Now prepare to get your arse whipped in the Dome by a superior team on Jan. 9th.
My point though is that some (notice I said some) gumps don't want to even discuss the possibility. Some don't understand that an LSU/Bama rematch is not set in stone, nor is it wrong to discuss the possibility.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:16 am to WoWyHi
12-6 (BS out of bounds call in OT)
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:16 am to los angeles tiger
quote:Too bad 1912 is all that matters now.
You missed your kicks on route 9 to 6.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:17 am to ALTiger
quote:
We scared duh
I've pissed myself twelve times since Saturday.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:19 am to WoWyHi
quote:you will Jan. 9th
I've pissed myself twelve times since Saturday.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:20 am to SabanIsAGod
quote:
you will Jan. 9th
12 times in one day? I don't know man, that seems like a bunch.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:25 am to SabanIsAGod
Are they gonna quit kicking the ball to Patrick Peterson or what???
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:32 am to SabanIsAGod
How big of a fricking troll are you?
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:38 am to WoWyHi
quote:
The degree to which gumps don't realize that it's ok to discuss other options other than an LSU/Bama rematch is insulting to everyone.
The degree to which you corndogs make that 9-6 win in overtime seem like a complete and total beatdown is hilarious to even more people.
You all claim to have dominated Alabama the entire game yet we out gained you in the air 199-91 with both teams having 2 picks. Only difference there is one of ours was from a wide receiver instead of the highly touted starter that had played SO well all season long and was gonna torch Alabama's secondary, who had 2 himself.
LSU did outgain Alabama on the ground 148-96. (108 of which from the RB's, the negative yardage was from sacks, which has nothing to do with rushing stats since they are passing plays.) So our RB's put up a 100 yard game against your "dominating" rushing defense.
Our Heisman Trophy leading candidate RB had over 180 total yards in that game, which has been praised by talking heads across the country as on of the more impressive offensive performances of the year because of LSU's defense.
We also outgained you in total offense 295-239. This isnt a moral victory by any means, but it is proof that your bullshite domination spin story is completely fabricated. So you can take your total domination and stuff it.
That game was a epic battle of 2 behemoth's with VERY little difference between them and the winner at the end squeeked out by a FG in OT. Nobody dominated ANYONE. And to act like Alabama played with any less intensity than LSU is a pitiful attempt to convince yourselves that you will mop the floor up with us in NOLA because it scares the shite out of you that there is just as good of a chance that you will lose as there is that you will win.
FACT
DEAL WITH IT
This post was edited on 11/29/11 at 12:40 am
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:41 am to ThaKaptin
You are completely negating the FACT that the game was played at BDS. Your shitty offense played with no crowd noise while ours battled it the entire game.
Posted on 11/29/11 at 12:42 am to ThaKaptin
quote:
FACT
DEAL WITH IT
Bama lost. Deal with it. I've never claimed it was a beatdown, just that the final score reflects a win. Period.
It is fine to discuss other scenarios, but some gumps are so blinded right now, they believe there is no alternative to an LSU/Bama rematch. This simply isn't true.
This post was edited on 11/29/11 at 12:42 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News