Started By
Message
Last time your school had consecutive decades with perfect seasons?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:17 am
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:17 am
If we're playing the "dumb irrelevant win stats" game, figured I'd throw my hat in the ring with something that at least hangs banners
90s-00s-10s tyvm
I'll hang up and listen
90s-00s-10s tyvm
I'll hang up and listen
6
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:17 am to TheSandman
Chad Kelly will go off on y'all
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:18 am to TheSandman
ole miss makes banners for these things
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:21 am to schwartzy
That's an Auburn fan yo.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:21 am to TheSandman
quote:
perfect seasons?
does Florida have any?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:28 am to TheSandman
20s, 30s, 40s
60s, 70s
90s, 2000s
60s, 70s
90s, 2000s
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:31 am to Brageous
quote:
ole miss makes banners for these things
For undefeated seasons?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:32 am to NYCAuburn
they make banners so that they have banners
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:40 am to TheSandman
quote:
90s-00s-10s tyvm
AU's highs are very high. The inconsistency, IMO, prevents those highs from being Nattys.
That '93 team was really good, but probation hurt them and the fact that they were like 5-6 the year before meant they started ranked so low.
That '04 team was great. Loaded. However, losing to USC in '02 & '03 and coming off a disappointing 8-5 record from '03 made it hard for them to climb past USC.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:46 am to bamasgot13
quote:
That '04 team was great. Loaded. However, losing to USC in '02 & '03 and coming off a disappointing 8-5 record from '03 made it hard for them to climb past USC.
USC was also a historically good team in 2004. Had Oklahoma put up more of a fight against them and AU performed better against VT, there might have been a split title. But Auburn squeaked by Virginia Tech and Oklahoma got humiliated.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 9:48 am to CrimsonCrusade
quote:
But Auburn squeaked by Virginia Tech
The score might have been close, but this is incorrect. There wasnt going to be a split title that year. no matter what
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:14 am to NYCAuburn
I think Auburn was no doubt the second best team in football that year and should have been in that game. But no one was beating USC that year they were one of the best teams of all time.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:16 am to amders44
quote:
I think Auburn was no doubt the second best team in football that year and should have been in that game.
I think we should have been in the game(as an Auburn grad) but as a CFB fan, according the selectors, they got it right
quote:
But no one was beating USC that year they were one of the best teams of all time.
They almost lost a few times to bad teams, they werent as good as people say they were. They get a lot more hype after the fact because of how well some players have done in the NFL
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:21 am to NYCAuburn
Probably right although the QB was much better in college than the league.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:22 am to TheSandman
Decades start on year 1. You don't have a perfect season in the '10s. Edit OP.
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:25 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
Decades start on year 1. You don't have a perfect season in the '10s. Edit OP.
So the year 2000, was actually the 90's and 1990 was actually in the 80's?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:29 am to NYCAuburn
Do you think the first year was called Year 0? So to answer your question, yes. The first decade was 1-10, the rest are just the same. 
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:31 am to JuiceTerry
quote:
So to answer your question, yes
lord you dumb
When did the completion of the tenth year end of the first decade?
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:35 am to JuiceTerry
Oh dang you're right I'll go ahead and delete the thread
Posted on 7/18/16 at 10:36 am to NYCAuburn
quote:And you call me dumb.
When did the completion of the tenth year end of the first decade?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News