Started By
Message

re: Kentucky claims 1950 football national championship

Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:54 pm to
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
16822 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 1:54 pm to
I am sure they are claiming it because NC was picked before the bowl game in those days. Problem is that they finished ranked 7 that year and you would have to go through the other undefeated teams ahead of them and see how they finished before you jump UK 7 spots.
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

FWAA and NFF were respectable selectors, but never held the same weight. Both selectors never conducted weekly polls. They just named a champion at the end. AP and UPI conducted weekly polls. The majority of the college football world only goes by AP and UPI/Coaches. That's a given fact.

1958 National Champions: LSU with 15 selectors including the AP and UPI.

Iowa doesn't claim the title, but they were named by only 1 selector, the newly formed FWAA as they deemed their Rose Bowl win over #16 California to me bore impressive, yet LSU shutout #12 Clemson in the Sugar Bowl.

LSU (11-0-0); Iowa (8-1-1)

Tell me how the FWAA is a valid selector?

You are an Alabama fan. I am surprised you don't know more about 1961. Alabama went (11-0-0) en route to an AP and UPI national championship. To me, and many others, Alabama is the sole champion. But don't tell Ohio State that.

Ohio State (8-0-1) was also selected as national champion by the FWAA.

For those above reasons, the FWAA doesn't hold as much weight as the AP and UPI/Coaches

You need to read the actual NCAA records book.
Posted by JDHLaw
Member since Jun 2013
1040 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 5:03 pm to
I claim 1950 and 1898. UK's best team under the Bear (1950) resulted in a recognized national championship and UK's best team of all time (1898) was known as "the Immortals" because they were unbeaten, untied and unscored upon.

The Immortals played legendary football squads like the 160th Indiana and Co. H of 8th Massachusetts.

Suck it, haters. I hope they commission an even crappier trophy for the 1898 squad.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164071 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 8:49 pm to
Nick Saban and Bear Bryant now have one more thing in common.

Now they both won a fake national title at another SEC school before going to Alabama.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17045 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 8:57 pm to
Damn right. Kentucky, Tennessee, and Oklahoma claim 1950.

Kentucky beat Oklahoma, endjng their record setting winning streak.

Oklahoma, shut the frick up.


Tennessee beat Kentucky.
Kentucky finished 5-1 and won the SEC. Tennessee didn't even win the conference that year yet claim to be national champions.


4-5 Mississippi State beat Tennessee.


Tennessee, shut the frick up.
This post was edited on 7/27/16 at 9:02 pm
Posted by tennvol
Member since Nov 2014
2495 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Tennessee, shut the frick up.




Tennessee beat you that year!
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Tennessee beat Kentucky.



So, we have a better claim to the title than you. Sit down little bro
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:23 pm to
UK 48, Miss State 21
Miss State 7, UT 0
UT 7, UK 0

Advantage UK.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

UT 7, UK 0

Advantage UK.








Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

So, we have a better claim to the title than you. Sit down little bro

I thought no one was allowed to claim a national title in a year when they didn't even win their conference?
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

I thought no one was allowed to claim a national title in a year when they didn't even win their conference?




I'm curious as to how they won the conference when we had the same record and the Tennessee had the head to head? What kind of witchcraft voodoo buttfrickery is that?
Posted by AlabamaAlum07
Member since Jun 2014
2027 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:40 pm to
They played an extra conference game which was a common thing to do back then before the 70s.
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3155 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

the NCAA recognizes ours.


Actually the NCAA acknowledges yours. There's a difference.
Posted by shotcaller1
Member since Oct 2014
7501 posts
Posted on 7/27/16 at 10:21 pm to
Upvoted
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
4992 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 2:34 am to
Oklahoma's record winning streak is 47 games (1953-1957).

Oklahoma was the only undefeated team in 1950 as bowls didn't count, but were merely exhibition games.

Oklahoma won Associated Press and United Press. You Kentucky can sit down.

Besides, Tennessee has a more legit claim to 1950 than Kentucky.

Tennessee lost their only game early in the season. Kentucky lost their final game of the regular season.

Advantage - Oklahoma
Advantage - Tennessee (finished higher ranked than Kentucky in both polls)

UK, stick with your coRUPPt basketball history.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17045 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:01 am to
quote:

I'm curious as to how they won the conference when we had the same record and the Tennessee had the head to head? What kind of witchcraft voodoo buttfrickery is that?

We were 5-1. Y'all were 4-1. And you lost to a 4-5 Mississippi State team.

Now explain to me how a team that didn't even win it's conference is supposed to be able to claim a national championship but the team who did isn't? That's voodoo buttfrickery.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17045 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:07 am to
quote:

Oklahoma's record winning streak is 47 games (1953-1957).

Oklahoma was the only undefeated team in 1950 as bowls didn't count, but were merely exhibition games.

Oklahoma won Associated Press and United Press. You Kentucky can sit down.

Besides, Tennessee has a more legit claim to 1950 than Kentucky.

Tennessee lost their only game early in the season. Kentucky lost their final game of the regular season.

Advantage - Oklahoma
Advantage - Tennessee (finished higher ranked than Kentucky in both polls)

UK, stick with your coRUPPt basketball history.
So in one breath you say Kentucky can't claim it because we lost our last regular season game. Meanwhile Oklahoma lost their last game of the entire season. In what sport can you claim a natty under such circumstances? Advantage Kentucky.

You again say Kentucky lost their last regular season game whereas Tennessee lost earlier. In what world does the team with 1 loss to a 10-1 team have a worse resume than a team with a loss to a 4-5 team? Advantage Kentucky.
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 6:08 am
Posted by Oklahomey
Bucksnort, TN
Member since Mar 2013
4992 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 12:09 pm to
Timing. Tennessee recovered and won out. UK ended season on a loss.
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 12:48 pm to
The final AP poll was taken before the season even ended. That fully discredits it.

UK, the SEC champs, beat OU, the big 7 champs and claimed the NC. All of the teams ahead of UK in the final poll lost except UT, who finished second to UK in the SEC.

Advantage, UK.

Oh, and for the basketball comment.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17045 posts
Posted on 7/28/16 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Timing. Tennessee recovered and won out. UK ended season on a loss.
No, pretty certain Kentucky ended the 1950 season beating Oklahoma's arse in the Sugar Bowl.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter