re: Joe Burrow vs Trevor Lawrence

quote:

---

The kid that I like, I would rather have Lawrence and I’m glad we got to him, but I like that kid at Ole Miss. Haven’t seen him enough to know if how he would translate into the NFL but I like that kid too. He’s was fun to watch.

---

Please don't drive the grandkids anywhere gramps because after this post it's obvious you wouldn't pass a sobriety test.

quote:

---

Because he can make every throw, big arm, quick release, makes his progressions, mobile, accurate and throws well on the run if thats not enough you can just listen to NFL scouts.

---

Sometimes.

Trevor has everything physically. Mentally he'll never be as good as Burrow.

Ahh baseball guy too. Yeah I would agree. Didn’t the RB from Ole Miss get drafted as well out of high school?

Trevor Lawrence is undefeated in 2 years of playing. How many games did Lsu and Joe Burrow lose last year I think 3. I will take the proven winner any day over anything else.

Joe Burrow may go on to be the best quarterback ever and is having an awesome season and will probably win the chairman. But I love winners and Lawrence haven't lost a game yet so I'm picking the proven national championship winner. Tom Brady don't always have the best stats but when the game is on the line he wins. I'll take the winner any day over the stats.

quote:

---

I could see taking Lawrence. Has maybe more raw talent. But Fields? Have you really watched him? Kid makes some bad throws.

---

People have these opinions without watching the games or knowing much about football.

Fields in his first year as a starter is a more complete, more accurate, smarter quarterback than Lawrence in his second. Fields decision making makes Lawrence (a lot of the time) look indecisive and bumbling.

Burrow - older, yes - but also in his second year as a starter is a complete, NFL ready Quarterback who can do everything you ask a pro signal caller to do. His command of the offense and improvement year over year say something about his work ethic and potential, and his leadership - the way he raises the level of play of his entire team is something neither of the other two have shown.

In this race 1, 2, and 3 are clear, and there's a pretty large distance between each.

quote:

---

LOL. You haven’t watched Lawrence this year outside of the UNC game. Fields looked average against PennState.

---

I watched every game. Watched the Wake offensive series 3 times each.

Go ahead. Watch it again.

quote:

---

Ain’t nobody watching 2 hours of that shite

---

Lol. I understand. Just skip to Clemson's first half Offensive Series. It's obvious.

quote:

---

I watched Fields during the Penn State game. If you can stop the run and keep Fields contained, they are beatable. The team talent surrounding Fields is what makes him look good. He throws to a lot of wide open WRs with plenty of time in the pocket.

Ohio State is a great team, but Fields is a small part of that. Their OL and DL are the difference.

---

You watched him in one of his worse games vs a top 10 team. Watch Lawrence in one of his better games vs Wake Freakin Forrest and Fields looks better.

Lawrence has better receivers, a better RB, and an O-Line just as good.

And he's playing in the ACC vs nobody. And Fields still looks and performs better. Why is this a discussion?

ETA:
You were just saying he's better than Burrow, so I'm obviously wasting my time. Have a good holiday.

quote:

---

Burrow is this year's Tua: Great against inferior competition, average when shite gets real.

---

You clearly haven’t watched Burrow play.

at Alabama 31/39 (79.5%), 393 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT
vs. Auburn 32/42 (76.2%), 321 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT, 1 rush TD
vs. Florida 21/24 (87.5%), 293 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT