Started By
Message

re: it's a SETUP Aggies don't fall for it...

Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:10 am to
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145162 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Bama AND LSU owns your bitch
one of these 2 is different from the other. Can your gump brain guess what is different?
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15559 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:13 am to
quote:

A&M/JFF will be scary good next year - combine that with a MUCH easier schedule in 2013 than 2012, and hopefully A&M will win the SEC West (or more).


LSU in Death Valley.
Posted by elit4ce05
Member since Jun 2011
3743 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:13 am to
yep,Bama=BCSNC 3 of last 4 years
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15559 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:15 am to
That's not really owning THEIR asses, though...

At least LSU beat them twice in a row recently. Alabama played them ONCE recently... and lost... in an NC season.

Not gonna pretend it wasn't a one-two-punch that A&M got to finish, though.
Posted by 3legr
Member since Jan 2012
232 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:16 am to
The ammount of overall childish fail here is impressive.
Screenshot though:
quote:

if you win the conference next season; I will ban myself from SECrant for life.


Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:18 am to
quote:

someone should do stats on how many Ag threads are starting by non-Ags



Someone should do stats on your NC wins.
Posted by elit4ce05
Member since Jun 2011
3743 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 11:23 am to
i believe it was him who first posted Bama was their bitch after winning one game.
Posted by Bob Ag
Austin
Member since Aug 2011
3008 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Texas A&M had one good year. No one gives a shite about your homosexual program. You haven't done anything in 15 years.


You sound very beaten down. Its very sad.

Posted by leoj
Member since Nov 2010
3106 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

You haven't done anything in 15 years.


oh the irony
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:08 pm to
Lots of fear and I love it.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Lots of fear and I love it.


No, we are just wondering why the hell Aggie is getting so much hype. A&M had like two impressive games all year and now they are NC favorites? Please. Win first. Talk later.
Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

it seems like a stretch to think they have a better year than this past season.


I do not know if A&M will have a better year, but I am almost certain that we will have a better team. Yes, you listed all of the losses, but you neglected the gains. We start the year not with a freshmen taking his first college snap in the first year of a new system and new coach, but with a Heisman winnng QB playing in the second year of a system that the team has completely bought into and under a coach they now are completely confident in. We are returning 3 of 5 starters from one of the nation's best offensive lines, including a starter who would have been a first round pick had he left. We are not merely returning our most productive running backs - we are getting two RBs who were not eligible to play last year but whom, by all accounts, were incredible in practice. We are returning our most productive WR, a guy who was only a freshmen with limited football experience last season. We will have a massive class of incredibly highly recruited WRs from which to find a couple of guys who can help the only offensive unit that saw substantial losses - the WR corp.

Defensively, we have more of a concern, but not as many concerns as we had going into this year. We did not know if we had a front seven that could handle SEC play. We did. Moore is the only guy we are losing defensively that has the kind of talent that we won't be able to replace. We lose one safety who was a contributor (Terrell) and one corner (D. Harris). All other pieces in the secondary will return (Harris, Raven, Everett, Matthews, and Hurd).
Posted by cornhat
Member since Feb 2011
3393 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:16 pm to
Don't you have a shitty basketball thread to start? One in which the refs are out to get Bama?
Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

A&M had like two impressive games all year





Bama, Miss St, Ark, Auburn, OU, Mizzou

You will no doubt point out that some of those teams were bad. That's true. Still, A&M looked impressive in those games. We buried them. We looked really impressive while beating those bad teams.
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:18 pm to
You're not just wondering about the hype. You're trying to preempt it as unjustified.

But there simply wasn't a hotter team at the end of the season last year.

And what do you mean by "win first"? What standard of winning must a team attain before hype is okay?

Why doesn't 11-2 meet that standard?

Last year it was "Aggy will be lucky to win 6, so shut up." Now what's the line? Win a championship two years in or all is for naught?

No.

And you know the answer is no.

Hence the fear.

This post was edited on 1/17/13 at 12:22 pm
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Bama, Miss St, Ark, Auburn, OU, Mizzou


Bama & OU. The rest don't impress me or anyone else.

And that said, A&M had probably more bad games than good games (LSU, Florida, Ole Miss).

So again, why should I believe A&M is the next great SEC team?
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33939 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

And what do you mean by "win first"? What standard of winning must a team attain before hype is okay?


You could start by winning your division.

quote:

Why doesn't 11-2 not meet that standard?


3rd place in the West after the head-to-head tie breaker with LSU.



Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

You could start by winning your division.

This just distorts the point.

This means "win a BCS title."

So again, is that your exclusive standard for winning that justifies hype?
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

oh the irony


im not sure you know what irony means
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 1/17/13 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

what do you mean by "win first"? What standard of winning must a team attain before hype is okay?

Why doesn't 11-2 meet that standard?

Last year it was "Aggy will be lucky to win 6, so shut up." Now what's the line? Win a championship two years in or all is for naught?



The goalposts will continue to be moved--a sure sign of seriously rustled jimmies
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter