Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:42 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
AR - Arkansas State 7-5
Would have been funny to watch ASU skullfrick the piglets this year.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:49 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
Lets be honest, does anyone ACTUALLY believe auburn is better than Alabama?
Uh yeah. They won the head to head matchup. There are fluke wins, but that wasn't one of them.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:51 pm to CNB
quote:
Uh yeah. They won the head to head matchup. There are fluke wins, but that wasn't one of them.
That game was the definition of a fluke win
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:52 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Yep. Has been every year forever. :flagship:
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:52 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
That game was the definition of a fluke win
How so?
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:54 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
Love your logic
I thought this was pretty sound. I looked at Overall Record and Head to Head. What logic would you use?
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:55 pm to CNB
quote:
How so?
You serious, Clark?
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:55 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
I'll bite. Does anyone really think Baylor would be better than 8-4 in the SEC?
IDK, but I think that Baylor would beat aTm heads up. So there's that and this year's record.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:56 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
You serious, Clark?
Answer the question
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:58 pm to CockInYourEar
TX A&M - 12-0 with Baylor's pussy schedule
Posted on 12/28/13 at 1:59 pm to CNB
quote:
Answer the question
The obvious answer is the field goal return for the Win. Has that EVER happened? Fluke. Plus the Auburn TD when they had a lineman down the field. Lucky stuff
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:00 pm to TheCheshireHog
quote:
Surely this is a flame thread and you're not actually ignorant enough to think that AState is better than Arkansas.
Why? They won more than twice as many games than Arky, However, it's not like we can get a head to head matchup, I don't think y'all have ever played them. Why is that?
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:00 pm to ArmyHogs
Because they obviously would have lost had they not returned the kick?
I'm confused. Were they not tied when this happened?
I'm confused. Were they not tied when this happened?
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:03 pm to CNB
quote:
Because they obviously would have lost had they not returned the kick? I'm confused. Were they not tied when this happened?
Doesn't matter, had fluke.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:03 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
I think that Baylor would beat aTm heads up.
You'd be mistaken, IMHO.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:04 pm to bamagreycoat
quote:
That's why LSU fans take for granted the fact that they have nobody to share their state with. Imagine how good South Carolina would be if there was no Clemson?
That's fair and it would reciprocate for clem5on if it was the other way around. SC has 4million people or less over its history. So we've been fighting with them for instate talent for years. If clem5on never existed, I would think our football history would be vastly different. The Fridge Perry may have come to USC as well as many other great instate players who went to clem5on. Oh well, woulda/coulda/shoulda I guess.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:04 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
Why? They won more than twice as many games than Arky, However, it's not like we can get a head to head matchup, I don't think y'all have ever played them. Why is that?
LOL. Just terrible.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:06 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
Doesn't matter, had fluke.
Georgia game was a fluke. Not the Bama game.
Posted on 12/28/13 at 2:06 pm to CNB
I'll give the OP 6/10 for creativity.
Too shiny though
Too shiny though
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News