Started By
Message
re: Is it consensus that this is Auburns year again?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:46 pm to CrimsonChin
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:46 pm to CrimsonChin
Auburn is the clear leader...
I like Bama as the underdog tho..
I like Bama as the underdog tho..
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:46 pm to DMagic
What are you arguing then? I said the game wasn't close. Meaning we won and didn't almost lose. You then said that I was wrong but that you are not saying yall almost beat us.
This post was edited on 5/7/14 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:47 pm to MrAUTigers
So this is what you do when you realize that you have lost an argument, but don't want to admit you're wrong?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:49 pm to auburnphan23
quote:
Auburn had a double digit lead at the point of his injury
Do you remember the AU/TAMU game?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:49 pm to Rabern57
quote:
LSU got more lucky plays in that one half than Auburn got all last year. 2 busted plays and a fumbled punt inside the redzone
Whoa there, Silver, that's not luck, that's just y'all sucking.
Just like the 3 first half ints against Ole Miss wasn't luck, it was LSU sucking.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:50 pm to auburnphan23
Do you think LSU was lucky to beat you guys? Probably not. I don't think y'all were lucky to beat us anyway; I think Bo's mistakes and Freeze's awful play calling lost us the game. Not to discredit what y'all's running game accomplished which was impressive especially on the final drive.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:51 pm to Indfanfromcol
I told you.....you beat a young team, at key positions, making their first road start in the first quarter. Auburn played toe-to-toe the next three quarters. Hill got the vast majority of his yards on two long carries. I will go to my grave believing that if Auburn had not spotted LSU two quick TD's, off of turnovers, Auburn could very easily have won that game. You are the one saying Chavis has that style of O's number. I showed you stats that say you are full of shite. Put your money where your mouth is. I have done that.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:52 pm to Rabern57
You are and were wrong. You just don't understand what I type obviously.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:53 pm to taylormade
quote:
Bama
quote:
underdog
you keep thinking that
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:53 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
You are the one saying Chavis has that style of O's number. I showed you stats that say you are full of shite.
Uh, relevant stat: LSU 35 - Auburn 21.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:55 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:Oh, no. This anti-Auburn campaign going on on Rant has included busted plays and screw ups by the other team as luck. There is no Double Standard. If its luck when it happens to Auburn then its luck for the other team when they do it. Or all these people that can't accept Auburn being good or winning can quit trying to claim everything in the World as luck and admit Auburn won because they were good.
Whoa there, Silver, that's not luck, that's just y'all sucking.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:55 pm to MrAUTigers
The coach with that O's number still has extended an invitation this year...AU better be careful and not overlook that game or their season is done before it even starts
Thursday Night in Manhattan
Thursday Night in Manhattan
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:57 pm to BuccWildBammer
Yeah, that will be a tough one. Snyder is a damn good coach and will have them ready to play. I just don't know if they have enough O to beat Auburn this year.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:57 pm to MrAUTigers
quote:
Auburn played toe-to-toe the next three quarters.
Again, not scoring a single point in the entire first half means you played toe to toe? But yeah, that fumble putting LSU at in its own territory, and then a penalty right after that putting LSU at the 38 was really handing them the touchdown. But when Hill fumbled the ball after a great drive in the 1st, that didn't help Auburn?
quote:
Auburn could very easily have won that game.
Yes, if you take away the fumbles, and the tds, and you take away every time LSU stopped Auburn for a td, ultimatley meaning that every time Auburn had possesion of the ball, they scored....then yes, Auburn could very easily have won the game.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:58 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
WildTchoupitoulas
I don't see you on the list either. Running your mouth is cute. Grow a pair and back up the talk. LSU won last year so there is no doubt they will win this year, or is there some doubt?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:58 pm to DMagic
quote:That is why I asked you to explain what you are claiming I am wrong about. TOP and yards doesn't mean games are close.
You are and were wrong. You just don't understand what I type obviously.
This post was edited on 5/7/14 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 5/7/14 at 4:59 pm to Rabern57
quote:
Oh, no. This anti-Auburn campaign going on on Rant has included busted plays and screw ups by the other team as luck. There is no Double Standard. If its luck when it happens to Auburn then its luck for the other team when they do it. Or all these people that can't accept Auburn being good or winning can quit trying to claim everything in the World as luck and admit Auburn won because they were good.
Damn, braugh, read my whole post before responding.
It wasn't that long.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 5:00 pm to MrAUTigers
The thing that impresses me all the time when I watch K-State is how prepared their D is
The O always does just enough
The O always does just enough
Posted on 5/7/14 at 5:00 pm to Rabern57
We had an opportunity to tie the game in the fourth quarter. Did y'all have that opportunity against LSU? You don't have to answer I already know it.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 5:01 pm to BuccWildBammer
Kansas State's 2nd team almost beat their 1st team in a game that lacked any kind of offense (spring game). They won't be very good this year. Auburn rolls away with a win.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News