Started By
Message
re: If your team was about to hire a new coach, would you rather Saban or Harbaugh?
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:01 am to Henry Jones Jr
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:01 am to Henry Jones Jr
Thought the same thing
0
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:22 am to Henry Jones Jr
Stanford is a lot easier to win at than Ole Miss in the current environment of college football. Even all time, and taking into account Ole Miss' success in the 1950s and 1960s, Stanford still has a better overall winning percentage.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:27 am to Rex Manning
This one is a no brainer-Harbaugh in a landslide. He proved he could win at a college where the only recruits must be brainiacs. He he then won big in the NFL with a team that was miserable the years before he was hired. Saban has done neither.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:35 am to RedMustang
Stanford is not nearly as hard to win at as some posters are trying to argue. Nor was San Francisco is as much disarray, relative to talent, as some are suggesting. Jim Harbaugh is no doubt a tremendous coach, but you seem to be selling Nick Saban short on his ability to build. I will venture to guess that the same folks whole heartedly picking against Nick Saban are the same ones suggesting in the other thread that Alabama is nothing without him.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:37 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:He's not selling anything. He has Bama penis envy so bad that it's not funny. If there is a thread where he can flame Bama, he is in it.
you seem to be selling Nick Saban short on his ability to build.
Posted on 3/19/12 at 1:39 am to chilld28
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/19/12 at 3:19 am
Posted on 3/19/12 at 4:51 am to CapstoneGrad06
quote:Great fricking point...... Saban is great, but not.... On the same damn forum. Confused ranters?
I will venture to guess that the same folks whole heartedly picking against Nick Saban are the same ones suggesting in the other thread that Alabama is nothing without him.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News