Started By
Message
re: If rematches are supposedly unfair...
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:19 pm to BamaGround
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:19 pm to BamaGround
The very concept of a conference championship to give a title is based on a fallacy.
The Pac-10 had the absolute best system for handing out a title.
The Pac-10 had the absolute best system for handing out a title.
0
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:19 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
Great rematch last night between Wisconsin and MSU. Is it a draw?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:20 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Wanna rematch? Get a playoff system. Auburn fans have been asking for one since 2004.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:22 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
Get a playoff system.
I am all for it. The only team that deserves to be sore is a Stanford team whose only loss is to a good Oregon team. Losing to a 6 and 6 team gets you no sympathy from anyone with half a brain.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:23 pm to BamaGround
Rematches aren't unfair, not winning your conference, playing a weaker schedule, shitting the bed at home, and getting the nod is unfair.
You will lose then you can beg for 3 out of 5.
You will lose then you can beg for 3 out of 5.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:23 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
And what did stanford do other than not lose?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:23 pm to BamaGround
quote:
then why bother having the SEC Championship if it is a rematch of a regular season game? We all know the real answer is to squeeze every last dollar the SEC can out of TV and fan bases but it seems rather amusing by those opposed to a rematch to say the 2nd best team in the country shouldn't play in the BCS because they lost to the #1 team during the season and are from the same conference so therefore Bama shouldn't get a shot at the BCS. It may seem unfair to LSU since they already beat Bama but if Alabama is really the 2nd best team in the country then how is it fair to Bama to deny them a ticket to the game?
Since 1999 5 SEC Championship games have been a rematch of a regular season game. In all 5 rematches the team that won in the regular season won again in the rematch. Still the winning team had to go out and win again against the team they had already beaten in order to secure an SEC championship.
Personally I believe it really doesn't matter who LSU plays. I don't see anyone beating them. They could play OSU and Bama back to back in the same night and beat both of them. LSU is that good and the scary thing is they are a young team. Wouldn't be surprised to see back to back to back BCS titles for the tigers.
The SEC Championship selection process is an OBJECTIVE method.
The BCS Championship selection process is in very large part SUBJECTIVE.
Comparing the two is asinine.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:24 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:
touchdownjeebus
You must have took that pic after the Okie St loss. I'd hate to see your new picture after you lose to Bama in the NCG
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:25 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
You don't recognize your mother? After I PIIHB, I donkey punched her.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:25 pm to Volvagia
quote:
And what did stanford do other than not lose?
Beat a USC team that is a heck of a lot better than any team Okie St faced all year. (except for 6 and 6 iowa st. apparently they are pretty amazing)
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:32 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Worked out well a few years ago for the Super Bowl Champion Giants!
If I read or hear this stupid fricking comparison one more time....
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:35 pm to BamaGround
How is it fair to have the #2 team get an extra week to rest? How is it fair to have a team in the NC game that did not win their conference?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:35 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
Beat a USC team that is a heck of a lot better than any team Okie St faced all year. (except for 6 and 6 iowa st. apparently they are pretty amazing)
I would say that USC is AT LEAST on par with OU.
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:36 pm to tuptiger
Gumps are grasping at anything they can to legitimize this bullshite.
3 out of 5!!!
3 out of 5!!!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:37 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
yeah but conference championships actually require a team to earn it by winnng something to gain a birth. 
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:38 pm to JaboStokes
quote:
Great rematch last night between Wisconsin and MSU. Is it a draw?
They split on the year in 2 close games. How can anyone say that one team is better than the other?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:38 pm to Volvagia
quote:
I would say that USC is AT LEAST on par with OU.
Not a surprise coming from the brains of a swamp aggie. Thank god the CF voters are way more intelligent.
1 LSU (60) 13-0 1500
2 Alabama 11-1 1418
3 Oklahoma State 11-1 1400
4 Stanford 11-1 1283
5 USC 10-2 1179
6 Oregon 11-2 1170
7 Arkansas 10-2 1148
8 Boise State 11-1 1107
9 Wisconsin 11-2 1038
10 South Carolina 10-2 946
11 Kansas State 10-2 829
12 Michigan State 10-3 733
13 Michigan 10-2 707
14 Clemson 10-3 663
15 Baylor 9-3 656
16 TCU 10-2 632
17 Virginia Tech 11-2 591
18 Georgia 10-3 566
19 Oklahoma 9-3 386
20 Houston 12-1 370
21 Nebraska 9-3 363
22 Southern Miss 11-2 336
23 West Virginia 9-3 199
24 Penn State 9-3 129
25 Florida State
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:39 pm to touchdownjeebus
Screw it, I'm happy we will play the Gumps. Not only will we be able to laugh at them again, but I won't feel compelled to cheer for them in a bowl game.
Piss balloons at the ready, getting ready to knock ice cream cones out of little girls' hands, and can't wait to key cars and pull fire alarms!
Piss balloons at the ready, getting ready to knock ice cream cones out of little girls' hands, and can't wait to key cars and pull fire alarms!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:41 pm to touchdownjeebus
What no port-o-potty love?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:41 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:
touchdownjeebus
Instead you will probably get your teeth knocked out by the first lil girl you try to bully.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News