Started By
Message
re: I guess Mizzou fans jumped off the baseball bandwagon.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:18 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:18 pm to Cheese Grits
Damn now we got Kentucky football smack in here? 
This post was edited on 4/16/17 at 9:19 pm
0
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:24 pm to kilo
quote:
I have factual rebuttals. You all shout names...
Are you rehearsing lines? its pretty obvious the above is a lie.
quote:
There is no question, based on hard facts that Mizzou historically is better than Kentucky in football
Missouri doesnt even own the head to head? Maybe if Kentucky had historically played in the same conference, you could possibly justify such ridiculous claims.
quote:
How you all deal with these facts is up to you however I am the one thats "rustled" and looks like an "idiot"
FIFY. You're not very good at this.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:26 pm to jangalang
quote:
You're not very good at this.
Still has not answered the Big Hurt and Sir Charles question. I guess they have no folks with that Q factor so I am gonna say Auburn wins this.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:26 pm to jangalang
quote:
Missouri doesnt even own the head to head? Maybe if Kentucky had historically played in the same conference, you could possibly justify such ridiculous claims.
You think Kentucky is historically better than Mizzou in football? And you tell me "Im not good at this"
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:28 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Still has not answered the Big Hurt and Sir Charles question. I guess they have no folks with that Q factor so I am gonna say Auburn wins this.
Because, like always, you are trying to build a strawman that Im not interested in...
That question has no bearing on historical achievements of the programs in question.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:33 pm to kilo
quote:
You think Kentucky is historically better than Mizzou in football? And you tell me "Im not good at this"
Losing the H2H battle is too difficult of an obstacle to climb when trying to justify oneself as the superior program over another when both were in different conferences for the majority of the time. The thing is you haven't even tried to account for losing the H2H, you've done nothing but ignore it.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:34 pm to kilo
quote:
That question has no bearing on historical achievements of the programs in question.
It actually does.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:36 pm to jangalang
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:39 pm to kilo
quote:
You're really floundering in this thread.
That link literally proved nothing for you. I'd expect a P5 team in a different conference to beat Kentucky in the football wins department. Kentucky hasn't been playing Iowa State and Kansas in football every season just to pass time until basketball season. :roll eyes:
This post was edited on 4/16/17 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:42 pm to jangalang
quote:
That link literally proved nothing for you.
Im a little embarrassed for you. Serious.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:43 pm to WildcatMike
So much for Missouri being a baseball state.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:45 pm to kilo
quote:
You think Kentucky is historically better than Mizzou in football?
Yes, if Mizzou started in the SEC they would be a cellar dweller
If UK started in the Big 6
Below Oklahoma and Nebraska
Above Kansas, Iowa State, and Kansas State
In the Big 8
Above Oklahoma State and Colorado
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:46 pm to Cheese Grits
You all are not even trying anymore.
Mizzou started in the SEC 5 years ago and has already won its division, which includes Kentucky, twice while the Cats have never done so.
Mizzou started in the SEC 5 years ago and has already won its division, which includes Kentucky, twice while the Cats have never done so.
This post was edited on 4/16/17 at 9:47 pm
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:51 pm to kilo
quote:
Mizzou started in the SEC 5 years ago and has already won its division, which includes Kentucky, twice while the Cats have never done so.
But yet Kentucky has the head to head.
And y'all ran off your HC with BLM and poop swastika problems. Refresh my memory, who the frick is yall's HC now?
Posted on 4/16/17 at 9:57 pm to jangalang
Ah, yes, there it is...when the argument is lost talk about poop swastikas and SJW stuff.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:23 pm to kilo
quote:
Ah, yes, there it is...when the argument is lost talk about poop swastikas and SJW stuff.
The poop swastikas are just as much a part of your shitty school history as is your 1954 CWS win against "Rollins."
quote:
when the argument is lost
You can declare yourself the winner all you want, but at the end of night, Kentucky will still have the greater athletic program( including having a blue-blood basketball program and more H2H wins in football,) and you will still be the one that sounds like an idiot.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:26 pm to kilo
quote:
Because, like always
Never change
quote:
build a strawman
What debaters like to say when they are beaten
quote:
Im not interested in...
Yet here you are trolling away
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:37 pm to kilo
quote:
Mizzou started in the SEC 5 years ago and has already won its division
After the Vols fired the fat man and went in a decade long death spiral
After Urban fake a heart ailment so he could coach in the easier B1G
While Cats were in the Joker Era, setting back UK a good 5 to 10 years
While Richt was losing control of Georgia
You think those 2 years will be the rule while most sane folks know it was probably the exception.
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:40 pm to jangalang
quote:
But yet Kentucky has the head to head.
10-0 in basketball
Kansas is Kentucky's bitch
Missouri is Kansas's bitch
Kentucky > Kansas > Missouri
Posted on 4/16/17 at 10:40 pm to Cheese Grits
Saying Mizzou is clearly historically better than Kentucky in baseball and football in a thread started by a Kentucky fan to troll Mizzou types, is not "trolling".Its simply stating a matter of fact to provide some context for the insecure kentucky fan's troll thread. It has been fun though.
This post was edited on 4/16/17 at 10:42 pm
Page 7 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News