Started By
Message
re: How is leonard Fournette bald already?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:38 pm to CrimsonFever
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:38 pm to CrimsonFever
0
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:39 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
MELT
or gumps real life everyday. PAWWWWWW
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:39 pm to CP3LSU25
jesus, man
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:42 pm to cas4t
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:59 pm to CP3LSU25
Some people bald early some turn gray early. I started turning gray at 19. Been a slow process until now(49) and some of my douche bag friends that use to give me shite back then are now grayer than I am, shite happens!!
Posted on 3/12/15 at 3:59 pm to CrimsonFever
He is 20 or 21
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:01 pm to Macintosh504
That's what I was thinking. He was 18 in the 10th grade I think for a fact.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:03 pm to Nissanmaxima
Yeah, dudes that worry about this shite are funny to me. Stay in decent shape and gainfully employed, baldness will have close to zero impact on your life.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:03 pm to Macintosh504
Just made 20 in January.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:10 pm to CrimsonFever
what do you mean how is he bald already? ok...when God made leonard fournette he said thou shalt be a frickin beast running back and thou shalt be bald before you turn 20...im pretty sure thats just how it is man. some people lose their hair before you think they should. i dont think hes worried about it...even though he could make a great bosley representative when he gets drafted. wow
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:11 pm to Dirty Whistle
quote:
That's what I was thinking. He was 18 in the 10th grade I think for a fact.
For real? The developmental difference between him and most everyone else in his academic class would = man vs. boys. You can't compare an 18 year old 10th grader to a normal one nor a 20 or 21 year old true frosh to 17/18 year true frosh. LF would have a huge advantage just in terms of his body being much more like a grown man's body and closer to full development before you even get to trying to compare raw talent.
If that's the case no wonder he was a 5* and no wonder he performed better than most true froshies at his position. Given his age and the advantage it provides (the difference between 17/18 and 20/21 are IMMENSE), anything less than that would've been a major let down.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:13 pm to Prof
You'd probably be surprised then by how many of these football players are 19 when they start their Freshmen year in college.
This was the point of the origination of the thread. He wanted someone to point out how old Fournette was. Well done OP.
ETA - 1/18/1995 is his date of birth. He just turned 20. He wasn't 18 in 10th grade.
This was the point of the origination of the thread. He wanted someone to point out how old Fournette was. Well done OP.
ETA - 1/18/1995 is his date of birth. He just turned 20. He wasn't 18 in 10th grade.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:15 pm to Dirty Whistle
quote:
I think for a fact.
Fantastic.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:16 pm to Prof
So you're saying Nick Chubb is a better RB and he is younger than Buga?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:18 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
So you're saying Nick Chubb is a better RB
well anyone can obviously see that
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:22 pm to WG_Dawg
So Chubb is already more developed, as a RB, than Buga and has a higher ceiling because he is younger?
Looks like LSU got the short end of the deal.
Looks like LSU got the short end of the deal.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:22 pm to WG_Dawg
Lmao HAHAHAHAHAHAHA 
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:23 pm to Tornado Alley
quote:
So you're saying Nick Chubb is a better RB and he is younger than Buga?
He is at almost exactly one year younger than Fournette it looks like. I'll ignore the rest of your bait.
I think they're both great RBs and the next 2-3 years will be fun to follow them both.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:26 pm to WG_Dawg
LSU has a lot of players who wear braces that he school provides. If Henry wanted braces, bama could take care of it, and it's legal.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 4:27 pm to LSU-DUDE
quote:
Lmao HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
what exactly is funny? At this point, right now, the only metric you can point to to say lf is better is kick returns, but that probably has to do with the fact LF returned 20+ kicks to chubb's 0, so that's pretty irrelevant.
rushing Yards, YPC, rushing TDs, receptions, receiving yards, receiving TDs, and total touchdowns are all in favor of chubb. Some by a wide margin.
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 4:28 pm
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News