Started By
Message
re: How does the $20k fit in the equation?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:55 am to I-59 Tiger
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:55 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
I gathered from the AD's comments that it came from University funds.
I may have misunderstood, but if it didn't come from the Arkansas ath dept, what was the reason to reveal that?
Full disclosure, it was going to come out anyway and if you didn't notice that was the theme behind this entire scandal...
The AD was being upfront and releasing all the information the general public was going to find out anyway...
0
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:56 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
ESPN said that the money came from Bobby, not the school.
Then I misunderstood. But then why did the AD feel the need to reveal this?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:57 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Either way I believe it's a NCAA secondary violation, although I think coaches just have to go to a rules re-education
well,technically that was one of the things that got Galen Hall in trouble in 1989. Supposedly he was giving money to assistants out of his own pocket.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:58 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
coaches just have to go to a rules re-education
Then it shouldn't be a problem for good ole Bobby Motherfrickin Petrino... his schedule has cleared up a little bit.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:58 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:More facts that support his termination for cause.
But then why did the AD feel the need to reveal this?
The real answer is to help the school win the pr battle. The worse BP looks the fewer angry hog fans there are due to the decision.
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 9:59 am
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:58 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
well,technically that was one of the things that got Galen Hall in trouble in 1989. Supposedly he was giving money to assistants out of his own pocket.
Richt just got in trouble as well
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:59 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
well,technically that was one of the things that got Galen Hall in trouble in 1989. Supposedly he was giving money to assistants out of his own pocket.
This was before she was on his staff, another reason for the revelation as there isn't anything to hide because it isn't a NCAA violation in this case...
Posted on 4/11/12 at 9:59 am to I-59 Tiger
Wasn't there a coach that recently got in trouble for giving his assistants a bowl bonus out of his own pocket?
It was Richt wasn't it?
It was Richt wasn't it?
This post was edited on 4/11/12 at 10:00 am
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:00 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
Either way I believe it's a NCAA secondary violation
It sure sounds like it would be. I THINK (can't remember for sure) that Richt got some secondary violations when he paid all his assistants a little extra out of his own pocket.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:00 am to Stuttgart Tiger
Didnt Spurrier just get told by the NCAA that he couldnt give money out of his own pocket?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:02 am to DaleDenton
quote:
because it isn't a NCAA violation in this case...
by no means do I think this is an NCAA violation. I was just throwing out Galen Hall at Florida in '89 who was paying assistants some money out of his own pocket--which is a weird violation.
Its just the AD mentioned this more than once which if she was paid from Petrino's own funds IMO didn't need to be revealed other than to make Petrino look worse that he already did. Seems rather spiteful.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:02 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
It sure sounds like it would be. I THINK (can't remember for sure) that Richt got some secondary violations when he paid all his assistants a little extra out of his own pocket.
She wasn't a member of the staff in any capacity at the time of the payment.
No violation.
If it really was going to be a problem, all petrino had to do was give the money to her dad anyway...
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:02 am to parkjas2001
quote:
11.3.2.2 Supplemental Pay. An outside source is prohibited from paying or regularly supplementing an
athletics department staff member’s annual salary and from arranging to supplement that salary for an unspecified
achievement. This includes the donation of cash from outside sources to the institution earmarked for the
staff member’s salary or supplemental income. It would be permissible for an outside source to donate funds to
the institution to be used as determined by the institution, and it would be permissible for the institution, at its
sole discretion, to use such funds to pay or supplement a staff member’s salary.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:02 am to I-59 Tiger
quote:
But then why did the AD feel the need to reveal this?
Maybe it was a "you embarrass me, I'll embarrass you" kinda thing?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:03 am to DaleDenton
she should give that cash back, only fair.
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:03 am to NYCAuburn
She wasn't a member of the staff at the time of the money exchanging hands, this "relationship" had been going on for a while, long before he hired her a couple weeks ago...
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:03 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Maybe it was a "you embarrass me, I'll embarrass you" kinda thing?
based on his demeanor last night...I'd say that is a possibility
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:03 am to DaleDenton
quote:
She wasn't a member of the staff in any capacity at the time of the payment
Didn't know that. Then what was his excuse for the payment? How did he justify paying some random 25 year old 20K?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:04 am to DaleDenton
Did they give a date when the payment was made?
Posted on 4/11/12 at 10:05 am to WG_Dawg
quote:
Didn't know that. Then what was his excuse for the payment? How did he justify paying some random 25 year old 20K?
It was his own money, I didn't realize the University is suppose to be monitoring his bank accounts and flag large cash withdraws for further questioning...
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News