Started By
Message

re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

Posted on 4/24/24 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Honestly, NIL thing is annoying, not because it's changed our status (UK had the typical season it does under stoops) but because odds are the person cares 0 about the school and will leave at the drop of hat/opt put of bowl games.


So they’re now able to do the exact same thing coaches have been doing?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

And talking about communism while using the government to control organizations.


You really are an idiot.

I’d love to hear your take on child labor laws.

quote:

I'd just stop watching. It's not my only hobby in life, I have many.


But you won’t. This is what college sports is now. You keep talking like “if this happens then I’m out!” Well guess what…..it’s happened. And it will never go back to the way it was. So you’re not going to stop watching. You’ll still be sitting there every Saturday like a good little cuck watching something you don’t enjoy.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 5:54 pm
Posted by FlyDownTheField83
Auburn AL
Member since Dec 2021
441 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

When a full ride scholarship, free room/board, etc…become irrelevant ,….then things have gone off a ledge


You say these things like it is some sort of surprise. It is a FACT that these things have an insignificant value when compared to the salary paid to head coaches like Nick Saban. Now that the players are having that value/money come to them via NIL all sorts of people that were getting it (like Nick Saban) are saying how terrible it is,….too damn bad. It has been this way for the last 10-20 years, and admins and coaches stuck their heads in the sand and collected their millions of dollars. This mess should be blamed on those people, not the players that are finally getting some value from a system that was rewarding the wrong people.

Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:15 pm to
Yep. And now we have a bunch of armchair dabo sweeney’s threatening to quit watching but somehow they’re still here.
Posted by FlyDownTheField83
Auburn AL
Member since Dec 2021
441 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:17 pm to
quote:

So they’re now able to do the exact same thing coaches have been doing


Preach on…..
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
5910 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:17 pm to
I'm fine with the players getting paid but I'm not fine with NIL being used as inducement. I'm fine with player free agency, I'm not fine with it being unfettered.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22659 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:48 pm to
quote:


Ah. so what person is responsible for determining said value? I’ll answer that for you…..it’s the person who is willing to pay said value. But the “oh no see that’s different!” argument is fricking hilarious.


The players aren't worth more, they are easily replaceable and are replaced constantly.

Coaches on the other hand are not as replaceable. Because they are more valuable, have way more responsibilities and their jobs require much more expertise. And their contracts include buyouts and other protections for the schools.

quote:


Says the guy angry that two consenting parties are able to negotiate terms of payment.


False. The schools and the players have always come to the terms of the compensation for play sports. They play football, they get a scholarship with the benefits. That is the terms of payment. Nobody forces them to take it, they take it because it's a great opportunity.

You are the one saying they can no longer do that. You are the one that claims the schools have no rights in what they offer, have no protections for the resources they invest in them, and no rights to form a set of uniform rules among other schools to create a fair competitive product of which has created all the interest and revenue the sport generates in the first place.

Don't sit here and tell me you are for "capitalism" while using the government to remove any rights and protections for one of the parties involved, and are destroying the product they created which has produced the revenue to begin with.

quote:


Shouldn’t you be starting your own league in another country so you can limit how much money people can make? Or are you just going to keep crying about it?


Why? You're the idiot who thinks the draw is the players and not the schools. Without the schools, it's meaningless. So in what way would me creating another league without the schools prove my point of view?

You on the other hand don't need the schools, so all you have to do is tap into the recruiting stream. So if you want to put real capitalism to work, instead of using the government to force outcomes, you create the NCAA competitor that makes a better offer than what they are getting.

Maybe next you can get your lawmakers to pass laws that say teams from Mississippi can play 12 people on offense and defense but opponents can't and Ole Miss can finally win something for the first time ever.

Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
17166 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:46 pm to
I don't worry about it. It's the offseason, and NIL money isn't my money. I just say let me know when someone has signed on the dotted line to play for Kentucky and then I'll care. Done following the minutiae of recruiting these kids
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 1:37 am to
quote:

The players aren't worth more, they are easily replaceable and are replaced constantly.


Free market capitalism says differently.

quote:

False. The schools and the players have always come to the terms of the compensation for play sports. They play football, they get a scholarship with the benefits. That is the terms of payment. Nobody forces them to take it, they take it because it's a great opportunity.


Imagine thinking that revenue can ONLY come from one source.

quote:

You are the one saying they can no longer do that. You are the one that claims the schools have no rights in what they offer, have no protections for the resources they invest in them, and no rights to form a set of uniform rules among other schools to create a fair competitive product of which has created all the interest and revenue the sport generates in the first place.


Nope. I never said any of the above. You’re just making that shite up.

quote:

Don't sit here and tell me you are for "capitalism" while using the government to remove any rights and protections for one of the parties involved


You keep repeating this as if it’s true. Stop making shite up. The government isn’t removing anyone’s rights or protections.

quote:

instead of using the government to force outcomes


You’re doing it again.

quote:

Why? You're the idiot who thinks the draw is the players and not the schools. Without the schools, it's meaningless. So in what way would me creating another league without the schools prove my point of view? You on the other hand don't need the schools, so all you have to do is tap into the recruiting stream. So if you want to put real capitalism to work, instead of using the government to force outcomes, you create the NCAA competitor that makes a better offer than what they are getting.


I don’t have to start any other league. You’re the one crying like an idiotic bitch about NIL. And yes, NIL is a fine example of free market capitalism.

quote:

Maybe next you can get your lawmakers to pass laws that say teams from Mississippi can play 12 people on offense and defense but opponents can't and Ole Miss can finally win something for the first time ever.


And there it is…..the full meltdown of someone who has lost all ability of logical thought.


Why are you even still here? You obviously hate what college sports has turned into. What happened to those other hobbies you said you had?
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 1:38 am
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42508 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 5:21 am to
Push will come to shove when these players getting paid aren’t delivering titles or living up to the expectations

Another issue will be the transfer portal and constant movement especially when nil was promised
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 5:57 am to
quote:

Push will come to shove when these players getting paid aren’t delivering titles or living up to the expectations


Yep. The market will correct itself.
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4401 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 6:21 am to
We get it you dont like paying players. Its funny because yall did it for years and had no problem with it but now that it is legal for all schools to do it you hate it.

Tell your friends that we all get why the BBN is upset and we dont need a new post about the subject everytime you lose a player to a school with deeper pockets
Posted by swinetime
Member since Apr 2013
4401 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 6:43 am to
quote:

I'm fine with the players getting paid but I'm not fine with NIL being used as inducement.


See above. Same issue as ky fans. Bama paid players for years to entice them to play at your school.now that its legal for everyone you are realizing your rich donors arent wealthy. Really not in the ball park

Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9937 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 6:59 am to
quote:

Also, should schools now push back a bit? Schools pay you as an employee, you now pay for your own tuition, room, board, meals, insurance, etc.


Then one school says you get paid AND get all that free and they win the recruiting battle.

Without the rules that all pro teams play within, it will still be a bidding war.
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
9937 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 7:03 am to
quote:

Another issue will be the transfer portal and constant movement especially when nil was promised


Short answer is if they don't build actual professional structure around cfb it will collapse. Fans have been losing interest, and if they can't expect their players to last more than one year at their school this will accelerate.

The greed of schools has started to blow up in their faces. They still think they can get away with not paying players and this chaos is the product. The side effect is they're losing their audience.
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22659 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:


Free market capitalism says differently.


Once again it is not capitalism when you aren't allowing one of the parties to set their terms. It's the opposite of capitalism.


quote:

Imagine thinking that revenue can ONLY come from one source.


Imagine not knowing the difference between revenue and profits.

quote:



Nope. I never said any of the above. You’re just making that shite up.


No, that is exactly what you are saying when you don't allow one of the parties involved to set their own terms.

You, like most idiots these days, just don't like it when the reality of your policies and opinions are pointed out. You all want to live in this bullshite fantasy world where can just run around labeling shite whatever, when the labels don't even remotely match the reality.

quote:


You keep repeating this as if it’s true. Stop making shite up. The government isn’t removing anyone’s rights or protections.


The government is removing the rights of the schools to enter into contracts and agreements as they see fit.

You literally want to force the schools hands on what they can and can not do. Not capitalism.

quote:


I don’t have to start any other league. You’re the one crying like an idiotic bitch about NIL. And yes, NIL is a fine example of free market capitalism.


Except for the part where you tell other people they can't make rules or decide from themselves how to deal with it.

If it was a free market, the schools would be able to decide for themselves how to deal with it.

Government intervention is the opposite of a free market unless it's for criminal reasons.

quote:


And there it is…..the full meltdown of someone who has lost all ability of logical thought.

Why are you even still here? You obviously hate what college sports has turned into. What happened to those other hobbies you said you had?


You are the one claiming people don't want it because it won't benefit it. Which means you must want it because you think you will benefit since that is your frame of reference on the topic.

But you won't. Just like your #20 class last year, Ole Miss is going to stay the team that has never accomplished shite in it's entire history. Alabama and other top teams are going to get richer, win even more than they already do and cherry pick whatever quality might be available on your otherwise shitty roster.

So if you want to use government to benefit your football team, you might want to start looking at more drastic measures.

In 10 years, Ole Miss won't even be part of the SEC any more. You don't even realize the replacements have already begun and that we will end up with a 32 team super league that breaks away from the NCAA. When you turn college football into a full fledge business, the rights of "students" is going to go out the window and so will any reason to keep bottom tier teams around.

Turns out, the only way Ole Miss can get top tier players is when they are the only ones that are cheating and paying players. Once it opened up, Ole Miss recruiting suddenly goes to shite. The thing people like you claimed would happen to top tier teams.

This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 9:28 am
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Once again it is not capitalism when you aren't allowing one of the parties to set their terms.


Hysterical that you post these words with a straight face.

quote:

Imagine not knowing the difference between revenue and profits.


Income is revenue. You’re absolutely mental.

quote:

No, that is exactly what you are saying when you don't allow one of the parties involved to set their own terms.


Once again. fricking hysterical.

quote:

The government is removing the rights of the schools to enter into contracts and agreements as they see fit.


No. They aren’t. This is something you just keep fabricating in hopes of fitting your dogshit argument.

quote:

You literally want to force the schools hands on what they can and can not do.


And you literally want to force the student athletes hands on what they can and cannot do.

quote:

Except for the part where you tell other people they can't make rules or decide from themselves how to deal with it.


Once again. Hysterical.

quote:

You are the one claiming people don't want it because it won't benefit it. Which means you must want it because you think you will benefit since that is your frame of reference on the topic.


Link me saying anything remotely close to whatever the frick drivel you’re typing.

The rest of your post is essentially word soup. Nothing of relevance or logic.

You are the one upset over the current landscape of football. Once again….why are you still here? You obviously hate the idea of players being able to negotiate their terms of revenue. No amount of you vomiting on your keyboard will change this. Is continuing to cry about it a coping mechanism for you? You’ve shown to everyone that your arguments are idiotic and you have double-standards. Do you plan on logging off forever or are you just going to confirm me calling you an arm-chair Dabo Sweeney?
Posted by pankReb
Defending National Champs Fan
Member since Mar 2009
64513 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Bama paid players for years to entice them to play at your school.now that its legal for everyone you are realizing your rich donors arent wealthy. Really not in the ball park


It really is hilarious seeing bama fans, of all people, absolutely drenching their tampons over NIL.
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
2935 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:16 am to
quote:

no revenue to share unless you want to take it away from all the other sports because there are only 1 or 2 sports that draw income
Right... under a revenue sharing construct the university could make up funding shortfalls for the other sports or not - school's choice. Not football's problem if the water polo team needs a new pool.
quote:

the government to butt the frick out of it

Government has just said that the schools can't stop players from taking NIL money... which in a free society makes sense as it's anti-competitive.

Everything else is moot. Schools have a choice at this point to go full pro league with collective bargaining or run with the current status quo. In a full "pro league" there would still be NIL mind you. It's not like pros can't get sponsorships, it just has less of an impact.
Posted by Tennessee
Member since Mar 2024
67 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

1. It is here because of the cheating of Nick Saban and a couple of his proteges. Other schools knew the NCAA would not turn a blind eye for them, the way they did Saban. NIL had to happen to remain competitive.

2. Has destroyed any illusion of "amateur athletics" in college sports.

3. The rich will dominate.

4. I am just thankful Tennessee saw this comng and now has Spyre ahead of everyone's game, but it will not take long for Alabama, Texas, Georgia etc. to get their collectives up and running at full speed.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter