Started By
Message
Holy shite Mizzou got screwed
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:27 pm
That was a catch and he was targeted AF.
6
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:28 pm to Farmer1906
He clearly bobbled the ball, obvious no catch. No idea why the announcers ignored it.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:28 pm to Farmer1906
I really don't know how you don't let that stand and also call it targeting. It's close but I don't see anything indisputable.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:28 pm to Farmer1906
Yep. I thought for sure they were going to at least come back from review with a targeting call.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:29 pm to Farmer1906
The foot never touched
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:29 pm to Farmer1906
How was that not targeting??
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:29 pm to MykTide
They converted the 4th anyway, and more time off the clock. MIZZ wins if thy score here
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:30 pm to diddlydawg7
It clearly touched.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:31 pm to Farmer1906
It touched but the ball came completely out of his grasp well after the foot left the ground. This why they ruled he did not complete the process.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:31 pm to Farmer1906
And fans wonder why there are conspiracy theories.
Did either announce mention targeting on that play?
Did either announce mention targeting on that play?
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:34 pm to Rohan Gravy
Not a word from them.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:36 pm to Roger Klarvin
It was his right foot that touched the ground.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 6:37 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
It was his right foot that touched the ground.
Yea before he basically completely lost the balls before catching it again.
It may have been targeting but it was nowhere near a catch
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News