quote:
Great job rebuttling my earlier comments too bad more Bama fans cant be as of a Straight shooter as you are. I agree with every single point you wrote, great job. I think Ingram has a 50/50 chance, but Im just a big Gerhart fan. The fact that im a State Alum doesnt help Ingrams case on my behalf either.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by 4nmylifetime

668 Neighbor to the Beast

Member since Jun 2009

2844 posts

Posted on 12/9/09 at 2:05 pm to rolltide1283

Okay I understand that this thread can be an Ingram does/does'nt deserve the Hiesman debate, but put the names involved aside and label them players A,B and C. The answer I was after is whether or not posters feel that negative voting in Hiesman ballots is an isolated event or a rampant occurance that makes the award invalid.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by CHEEEEESE

Pres. of the Mike Lowery Fan Club

Member since May 2006

10476 posts

Posted on 12/9/09 at 2:28 pm to 4nmylifetime

quote:
a rampant occurance that makes the award invalid

Voters who feel really strongly about pimping one player will use the rest of their votes to sabotage another player and its bs. To not think Ingram is the best player... fine. To completely leave him off is bs.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by rolltide1283

Pinson

Member since Feb 2007

3362 posts

Posted on 12/9/09 at 2:36 pm to 4nmylifetime

quote:
Okay I understand that this thread can be an Ingram does/does'nt deserve the Hiesman debate, but put the names involved aside and label them players A,B and C. The answer I was after is whether or not posters feel that negative voting in Hiesman ballots is an isolated event or a rampant occurance that makes the award invalid.

I agree with your OP. The voting is ridiculous at times and some of the voters shouldn't be allowed to vote. Ingram, Gerhart, and Suh should not be left off ballotts IMO.

Page 1 2 3