Started By
Message

Hey OM. Is it true the Sugah Bowl trophy isn’t in Oxford

Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:38 pm
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:38 pm
anymore? Heard they made y’all give it back. Can one of y’all provide proof, as of today, that it is still there?
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:41 pm to
They will still claim it, like other things they claim despite not owning the trophy.

I hear a few other wins have been vacated from that year, as well.
Posted by Quicksilver
Poker Room
Member since Jan 2013
10745 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:45 pm to
The NCAA documents are public knowledge. Ole Miss didn't have to vacate any wins or give back a trophy.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27227 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

The NCAA documents are public knowledge. Ole Miss didn't have to vacate any wins or give back a trophy.


Miss. State posters can't read, so thank you for the summary, QS.
Posted by Torrence Hatch
Member since Nov 2018
664 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:48 pm to
I don't know, but I don't think MSU has even been to a Sugar Bowl lol
Posted by Freezus22
Da Boot
Member since Aug 2016
1609 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:50 pm to
Get off of the OMSpirit
Posted by Saskwatch
Member since Feb 2016
16548 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:50 pm to

Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27227 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I don't know, but I don't think MSU has even been to a Sugar Bowl lol


Confirmed.

Posted by Dday63
Member since Sep 2014
2297 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

The NCAA documents are public knowledge. Ole Miss didn't have to vacate any wins or give back a trophy.



Yes. The NCAA documents are public knowledge. In those public records, UMiss was ordered to vacate all wins in which ineligible players participated and to send the NCAA a report on which games were so effected. The report is due within 45 days from the appeal decision, which I believe was November 1.
Posted by Drebin
Member since Aug 2017
4446 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

The NCAA documents are public knowledge. Ole Miss didn't have to vacate any wins or give back a trophy.



You sure about that, puddin'?

Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72177 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:14 pm to
That’s a pathetic list of bowls.
Posted by jatebe
Queen of Links
Member since Oct 2008
18284 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

The NCAA documents are public knowledge. Ole Miss didn't have to vacate any wins or give back a trophy.
Wrong.

quote:

Penalty Summary: Penalties in the case include three years of probation; a two-year postseason ban for the football team; a financial penalty; scholarship and recruiting restrictions; vacation of records; a two-conference-game suspension for the head coach; an eight-year show-cause order for the operations coordinator; five-year show-cause orders for an assistant coach and an assistant athletics director; and a two-year show-cause order for another assistant coach. During the show-cause periods, if an NCAA school hires any of the individuals, that school must follow the terms of each of their respective orders.


NCAA.org Major Infractions Case
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11427 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:33 pm to
He is a Bama fan, he would know. Two decades on the NCAA repeat offender list will cause any fan to learn the ins and outs of the enforcement rules of the NCAA
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72177 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by HoustonRebel
Houston
Member since Dec 2015
432 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:07 pm to
Who gives af where the trophy is?
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
13986 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:12 pm to
Who was ineligible that played in the Sugar Bowl?
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4457 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

I hear a few other wins have been vacated from that year, as well.


Likely all wins from 2010-2013 will be vacated due to playing players involved in ACT fraud. Possibly some from 2014 and a few from 2015 (regarding Tunsil?).

OM was fortunate the NCAA didn't (or couldn't) go back farther. They had likely been committing that ACT fraud since 2006.
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
13986 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:17 pm to
Tunsil sat out most of 15 then was reinstated. So the NCAA is going to punish him, then reinstate him then say he was ineligible?
Posted by MedDawg
Member since Dec 2009
4457 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Tunsil sat out most of 15 then was reinstated. So the NCAA is going to punish him, then reinstate him then say he was ineligible?


The story I read was the first punishment was for the loaner cars and the second penalty (vacating wins) is for his getting free stuff from Rebel Rags. I wonder if the Rebel Rags lawsuit showed he didn't get free stuff would OM be able to get the Sugar Bowl win back?
Posted by Bearshark
Member since Sep 2018
8 posts
Posted on 11/26/18 at 2:34 pm to
And the obsession with Ole Miss continues. Man you guys need a life
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter