Started By
Message
re: Heisman year comparison: '09 Ingram vs. '85 Jackson
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:30 pm to FlukerFlakes
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:30 pm to FlukerFlakes
quote:
please refer to the yards per touch stat for both players
okay and if he would have played 2 more games, on pace with average, he would have had 2168.8 yards and 20 tds
2168.8>1992
2
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:31 pm to Party At LSU
quote:Good point.
Have you seen some of FlukerFlakes posts?
I'm not so sure...
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:31 pm to dawgdayafternoon
quote:
Ingram sucks. Saints fans will agree.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:31 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
okay and if he would have played 2 more games, on pace with average, he would have had 2168.8 yards and 20 tds
Or he'd have pulled himself or feigned injury.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to Alahunter
quote:fricking LOL.
He had a glass body
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to RobNation
quote:
quote:
Ingram sucks. Saints fans will agree.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to RobNation
quote:
Ingram sucks. Saints fans will agree.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to McGregor
quote:
FlukerFlakes
Heisman year comparison: '09 Ingram vs. '85 Jackson (Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:18 p.m.)
Ingram:
271 rushes for 1658 yards and 17 TDs
32 receptions for 334 yards and 3 TDs
Total = 1992 yards and 20 TDs and 6.6 yards per touch
Jackson:
278 rushes for 1786 yards and 17 TDs
4 receptions for 73 yards and 0 TDs
Total = 1859 yards and 17 TDs and 6.6 yards per touch
1992 > 1859
20 > 17
Ingram '09 > Bo '85
Plus, Ingram was just a sophomore and Bo was a senior. And Ingram led his team to an undefeated season and Bo led his to 4 losses.
quote:
McGregor
I forgot receiving yards.
Did you just out your alter?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
:oh snap:
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:32 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
okay and if he would have played 2 more games, on pace with average, he would have had 2168.8 yards and 20 tds
2168.8>1992
averages really aren't your strong suit.
they both averaged 6.6 yards per touch of the football. if you gave them the same # of touches, they would have the same # of yards. going by yards per game is not the most accurate stat. yards per play is much better.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:33 pm to RobNation
Saints suck, all fans agree.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:33 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Did you just out your alter?
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:34 pm to TT9
quote:
Saints suck, all fans agree.
It's Gooddell's fault.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:34 pm to FlukerFlakes
This thread is an abomination just like the last one.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:35 pm to wadewilson
Actually there is truth to that.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:35 pm to FlukerFlakes
quote:
averages really aren't your strong suit.
good stuffPosted on 12/12/12 at 1:35 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
This thread is an abomination just like the last one
Why? Ingram had a better Heisman season. Nothing wrong with that.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:36 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
This thread is an abomination just like the last one.
either you mad that 09 Ingram is just as good as 85 Jackson
OR
you mad that 09 Ingram is just as bad as 85 Jackson.
which is it. Also note that 09 Ingram played in a much more difficult SEC era than Bo did.
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:36 pm to FlukerFlakes
Without stat padding against southwest Louisiana or whoever they are now, Bo only had like 13 or 14 TDs that year. Incredibly weak heisman imo
Posted on 12/12/12 at 1:36 pm to TreyAnastasio
Toby Gerhart was better than Ingram but not quite as good as Bo.
Page 3 of 18
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News