Started By
Message
re: Has Bama reached that point yet
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:04 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:04 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
What does that have to do with your post? You're still wrong 
0
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:04 pm to Titus Pullo
Mid 80's to what 91 92
That 92 team was not as great as the year before
00-02
That 92 team was not as great as the year before
00-02
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:05 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
Uh huh.
Of course the '92 sucked.
Of course the '92 sucked.
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:06 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
Point me to when any of them won 4 Nattys in 7 years.
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:08 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
What USC dynasty are you talking about? The one that won only a single NC?
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:09 pm to SoFla Tideroller
NC are irrelevant prior to 2015
The committee makes the one post 2015 somewhat as well
The committee makes the one post 2015 somewhat as well
This post was edited on 10/19/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:12 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Watch USC from 2002 to 2008
Even when they lost they were clearly the more talented team
One exception possibly was the Texas game but that was because they had one amazing player
Even when they lost they were clearly the more talented team
One exception possibly was the Texas game but that was because they had one amazing player
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:13 pm to craigbiggio
I was able to use my magical powers and save it for you
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:14 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
NC are irrelevant prior to 2015 The committee makes the one post 2015 somewhat as well
This post was edited on 10/19/16 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:15 pm to craigbiggio
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:15 pm to Old Sarge
Bro 
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:16 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
NC are irrelevant prior to 2015 The committee makes the one post 2015 somewhat as well
I guess this means that your LSU Tigers, nor all of the dynasties you say are superior to Alabama, have ever won a "relevant" title?
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:17 pm to craigbiggio
I thought the"that will probably get you banned" part was essential
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:17 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
NC are irrelevant prior to 2015
So USC and Miami didn't win anything then, right?
In your mind college football started in 2016.
Typical fricking trash L5U fan.
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:18 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
It is the truth
Any year before Ohio State would not have been NC
Ohio State may have shouldn't even been in the playoff that year
Any year before Ohio State would not have been NC
Ohio State may have shouldn't even been in the playoff that year
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:19 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
USC and Miami
Alabama has surpassed anything either of those teams accomplished during their runs.
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:19 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
That lost to Ohio State makes me wonder because on that night it looked like Bama was outclassed something that never happened to USC or Miami in their prime
Dunno 'bout that...Miami was outclassed by Bama in the '93 Sugar Bowl when Miami was in their prime...and USC was outclassed by Texas in the 2006 Rose Bowl when USC was still in their prime as well...
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:19 pm to LSU Tigress 1995
quote:
Bama's lack of sucess from a lot of ex players in the NFL speaks to this as well
I would think Julio's $72M, Dareus' $96M, Barron's $45M, Ingram's $16M, Jackson's $32M and so on and so on for their SECOND contracts would indicate they've been fairly successful.
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:19 pm to Titus Pullo
quote:
What years would you say Miami was in their prime?
1992
Posted on 10/19/16 at 3:19 pm to TideSaint
Just a troll.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News