Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:54 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
They took advantage of us having 6 starters out of the game.
So you lack quality depth? What positions?
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:56 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
So? What's that got to do with Georgia?
I thought we were playing you guys in Pasadena, I must be mistaken.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 9:58 am to CarolinaGamecock99
I would favor OU, BUT, if Georgia can hold onto the ball rushing AND score td's, they can put the hurt on OK by getting and keeping them out of rhythym.
interesting matchup. I could see a blowout by eiher team, or a close game.
interesting matchup. I could see a blowout by eiher team, or a close game.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:00 am to stephendomalley
quote:
I would favor OU, BUT, if Georgia can hold onto the ball rushing AND score td's, they can put the hurt on OK by getting and keeping them out of rhythym.
interesting matchup. I could see a blowout by eiher team, or a close game.
Georgia is as, or more talented at every position outside of Quarterback obviously. At both teams playing their best, Georgia should have more depth and quality just based on recruiting alone. Talent doesn't always mean anything when you have a coach like Mark Richt or playing in a hostile environment, but he isn't coaching in this game, and its a neutral site.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:00 am to JCdawg
quote:
I thought we were playing you guys in Pasadena, I must be mistaken.
Last year's national champion struggled with Ga-Tech, Lousisville, NC-State, FSU, and lost to Pitt on their home field. They lost to Syracuse THIS year on their home field and they're back in the playoffs once again.
So I'll ask you again.....how do conference game results have anything to do with Georgia?
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:01 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:00 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
They took advantage of us having 6 starters out of the game.
Were you also missing 6 starters when Baylor had the ball with a chance to win it with a minute left in the game?
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:01 am to Hugh McElroy
Nope
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:02 am to Hugh McElroy
Sounds to me like they lack depth....
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:03 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
So I'll ask you again.....how do conference game results have anything to do with Georgia?
Do I really have to answer this? Everything is driven by results, without results we have no data to work off of.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:04 am to JCdawg
Yes. You have to answer this.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:04 am to JCdawg
Didn’t he use conference stats as a proof source for his ballclub being superior?
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:07 am to Peter Buck
quote:
Didn’t he use conference stats as a proof source for his ballclub being superior?
Yes sir, I believe he did.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:08 am to CarolinaGamecock99
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:09 am to Peter Buck
No I used NCAA stats about the scoring offense numbers for your shitty division.
How is that the same as saying "well you struggled with KSU in your conference so we're gonna WIN-WIN-WIN!"?
That's not "data". It's transitive reasoning.
How is that the same as saying "well you struggled with KSU in your conference so we're gonna WIN-WIN-WIN!"?
That's not "data". It's transitive reasoning.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:10 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:12 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
Last year's national champion struggled with Ga-Tech, Lousisville, NC-State, FSU, and lost to Pitt on their home field. They lost to Syracuse THIS year on their home field and they're back in the playoffs once again.
These are all valid points, but all of those teams outside of Pittsburgh you mentioned were fairly good teams last season, but you have to look it more closely. On paper, Clemson was more talented than all of those teams except for maybe FSU. So in big games, when playing their best, they were the better team. Talent and depth matters.
As I recall the ACC was 8-3 in their bowl games last season, further proving what I stated previously.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:14 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:13 am to CharlotteSooner
Oklahoma hasn't played a defense with a pulse pretty much all season and their defense has been shreded plenty this year. Baker for all his glory can't do a damn thing if Georgia is running all over the place and burning the clock.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:16 am to CharlotteSooner
quote:
your shitty division.
Vanderbilt beat K-State, but yes, very shitty for SEC standards.
This post was edited on 12/4/17 at 10:17 am
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:17 am to JCdawg
quote:
As I recall the ACC was 8-3 in their bowl games last season, further proving what I stated previously.
This is completely irrelevant to anything at all.
Posted on 12/4/17 at 10:17 am to CarolinaGamecock99
I'm leaning toward Oklahoma. Not because they're a better team, but they have more experience under the white-hot spotlight.
Page 3 of 21
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News