Started By
Message

re: Fulmer for Athletic Director - Pros and Cons

Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:01 pm to
Posted by msu202020
Member since Feb 2011
4142 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:01 pm to
Con:

Bilema won't be the fattest person in the SEC anymore.
Posted by cajunbama
Metairie
Member since Jan 2007
30949 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:14 pm to
Ohhh, well that changes everything.
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24208 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Bilema won't be the fattest person in the SEC anymore.


I bet Bert has 100 lbs on ole Phil iyam
Posted by VFL1800FPD
Nashville, TN
Member since Aug 2012
9056 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Ohhh, well that changes everything


just had to make sure you knew you were wrong
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Coach Fulmer showed that he can successfully lead a large and complex organization.

He has been involved with NCAA Athletics for 40+ years.


These two are essentially referring to the same thing, and he was terrible at it by the end.

quote:

He is a Tennessee man first last and always.

The skill set to coach and to be an AD are not the same.

He will do fine and he deserves our support.



None of these are arguments for why he would be good at the job, and the only support he needs are the millions of dollars he already got running the program off a cliff.
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 4:59 pm
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter