Started By
Message

re: Full Rendering of Improvements on Kyle Field..

Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:10 pm to
Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

This made my eyes bleed.


It might not be pleasing to the eyes, but there were some loud, loud, loud games played with the stadium looking just like that. As a kid, I would get free tickets from Dairy Queen to sit in the horseshoe section. I was there in 1989 with a 7th ranked LSU squad opened the season in Kyle Field and went home with a loss. I was there again in 1991 when Greg Hill began his A&M career with 200+ rushing yards against LSU, sending them home with another loss.
Posted by Shiner Bock Aggie
1985
Member since Aug 2008
517 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:10 pm to
I think Florida did their's first, then A&M and then Bama. All three are similar.
Posted by Jefferson Davis
Plank Road
Member since Nov 2011
5960 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:11 pm to
For the record, nothing will top LSUfreek's expansion design:

Posted by Shiner Bock Aggie
1985
Member since Aug 2008
517 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:13 pm to
Florida's Zone:

Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:13 pm to
Here's mine:

Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

LSUfreek's expansion design


Not saying he ripped that off, but photoshops like that have been seen around TexAgs for a long time.
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:13 pm to
Going to able to pack a lot of buttpirates into that stadium.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:14 pm to


Don't know how I'm just now seeing that, but that's funny right there
Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Going to able to pack a lot of buttpirates into that stadium.


You can start talking shite to A&M again when your team wasn't down 42-7 at half against them.
Posted by Jefferson Davis
Plank Road
Member since Nov 2011
5960 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Not saying he ripped that off, but photoshops like that have been seen around TexAgs for a long time.


His is just my personal favorite.
Posted by twk
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jul 2011
2117 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Ok I take back my horseshoe comment. But I believe the first mistake was the initial design on the sideline upper decks. But the bigger mistake is the zone. poorly designed in my opinion. Take that designer and kick him in the nuts.
I'm not sure it's possible to enumerate all the mistakes that have been made in building Kyle Field over the years. First, I'd start with building a horeshoe around a track. Lots of schools had tracks around their football field, but not all of them built seats in the endzone around the track--Auburn, Missouri, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Tennessee, just off the top of my head, had tracks around their fields initially, but didn't compound that mistake by building endzone seating around the track--they all got rid of the track before making a major mistake.

The second mistake was building the original stands at too low a rake (not steep enough).

Next, they screwed up by changing from a straight extension of the original grandstand (which they started with a small extension of the west stands topped by a modern press box in 1953), going to cantilevered upper decks in 1967, but then re-using the 1953 press box, causing the east and west upper decks to be built at different rakes (angles)--meaning that you could never seamlessly join the second level.

Third, they should have knocked down the endzone seats of the horseshoe much earlier than they did. They had design concepts showing a squared off endzone in the 60s, but this probably was jettisoned at the same time they decided to recycle the 1953 press box. They cured this mistake when they demolished the horseshoe in '99 as part of the Zone expansion.

I could go on, but those were the big ones, in my opinion.

This time around, I think we're making a mistake by not doing this in one year, and by failing to knock down the east 2nd and 3rd decks. But, if they do as good a job with this renovation as they did with the baseball facility, I'll be satisfied.
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:23 pm to
looks great imo...
Posted by Ostrich
Alexandria, VA
Member since Nov 2011
8730 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:23 pm to
Is the team gonna have to play in Houston(or somewhere else) for a year while they construct that? The stadium looks like it will be completely redone for the most part.
Posted by KaiserSoze99
Member since Aug 2011
31669 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

You can start talking shite to A&M again when your team wasn't down 42-7 at half against them.

He can start talking shite any time he wishes to talk shite. Since when has the scoreboard been a shite-talking prerequisite on the Rant? Quite frankly the best shite talking is when scoreboard is ignored...a la....the grinders.
This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 2:25 pm
Posted by Bose Ikard
Member since Jul 2012
826 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:27 pm to
Fair enough. I just thought it might be a good time to remind him that, at halftime of the game this year, Texas A&M University had 42 points while Auburn University had 7 points.
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:30 pm to
Bama's came after ATM.

ATM made the zone general admission seating way too big/went to high.

But the real crime is the near impossibility to easily connect the sideline stands with the Zone. Not sure if you blame this on te sideline Stands or the direction the designers went with the zone construction.

But I can imagine the fact that the sideline stands slope heavily back away from the field as a factor. The sideline upper decks are more behind the lower deck than above it as well as behind.

BDS sideline upper decks protrude a bit out over the lower deck. With this the upper deck is steeply sloped. This keeps the distance from the field and the rest of the stadium at a minimum.

Kyle fields sideline upper decks, it seems to Me, are all behind each other and carry the same slope degree. Which takes away a lot of flexibility to adequately connect everything.

I could be off a little. One thing is for sure us that this construction will be interesting to watch...

I also heard that building codes needing to be updated added an additional $50 million in cost.
This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 2:32 pm
Posted by AginAL
Member since Dec 2010
1378 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Going to able to pack a lot of buttpirates into that stadium.


We'll be going in dry on you again this year too!!
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:32 pm to
No, it's a 3 year plan all in the offseasons. They start with the East Deck after the last home game this year and I believe the South EZ. They do the West Deck Year 2 because they are going to prefab a ton of the luxury stuff while building the East Deck. Year 3 is all clean up and facade stuff. They are putting in the garages and parks and so on so anything that can't get done in Year 2. The goal is to not lose any home games and minimal seating. The trickiest thing I would think is how they are lowering the field but the West Deck will still be standing but someone 100X smarter than me is figuring that out.
Posted by DRE06
Houston
Member since Feb 2013
399 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

But the bigger mistake is the zone. poorly designed in my opinion. Take that designer and kick him in the nuts.


First you make a comment about the terrible horeshoe design.

Then about the horrible design of the zone, which is virtually identical both Alabama and Florida's stadiums.





This post was edited on 2/20/13 at 2:40 pm
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
8714 posts
Posted on 2/20/13 at 2:38 pm to
They had to keep the 2nd and 3rd decks intact to an extent or else they would have to be changed form 18" to 24" seats. Since those are all student tickets who stand anyway (and tend not to need the big seats us old folks do) it would just be throwing away thousands of seats. They are essentially re-doing as much as they can without it needing to be "re-coded".
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter