Started By
Message
re: For those of you still upset or confused about the Loston "late hit" call...
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:52 pm to LaBornNRaised
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:52 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
What is your opinion on the no call on HaHa?
Could have easily been called and probably upheld. I think it got missed because the action all happened at the same time - one player trying to make an INT, and HaHa making the hit.
1
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:54 pm to LaBornNRaised
quote:
would say he wasn't defenseless. Being brought down by another player at the time and he was still trying to gain yards.
Note 2: Defenseless player (Rule 2-27-14):
• A player in the act of or just after throwing a pass.
• A receiver attempting to catch a pass, or one who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a ball carrier.
• A kicker in the act of or just after kicking a ball, or during the kick or the return.
• A kick returner attempting to catch or recover a kick.
• A player on the ground.
• A player obviously out of the play.
• A player who receives a blind-side block.
• A ball carrier already in the grasp of an opponent and whose forward progress has been
stopped.
• A quarterback any time after a change of possession.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:56 pm to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:57 pm to Tuscaloosa
Tuscaloosa if you get 20 pages it's because of me 
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:57 pm to Roger Klarvin
Im glad he got to stay in the game because I hate that rule, yet another rule to pussify the game,and I don't think he was trying to be dirty but was just a bit jacked up. Norwood was laying offbalance on the guy all he had to do was push him over with his hands. Going helmet first does make it a valid argument though under these rules we are currently playing under.
Now what I also hated was Gary's 2 cents at the end of the game that any offensive player who lowers his helmet during a play should automatically cause a dead ball spot. This is how this pussification hole keeps getting dug deeper.
Now what I also hated was Gary's 2 cents at the end of the game that any offensive player who lowers his helmet during a play should automatically cause a dead ball spot. This is how this pussification hole keeps getting dug deeper.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:58 pm to TheWhizzinator
quote:
This should have been called but of course it wasn't
Doesn't have anything to do with the play in question, but at least there was a legitimate reason for missing this call. There was a play on the ball being made by Belue, which I'm sure is what every ref in the area was looking at - as they should have been.
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:58 pm to LsuTigers80
quote:
Tuscaloosa if you get 20 pages it's because of me
Posted on 11/10/13 at 11:59 pm to TheWhizzinator
quote:
This should have been called but of course it wasn't
He used his arm to knock him down. Dear lord it just keeps getting worse.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:00 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
He used his arm to knock him down. Dear lord it just keeps getting worse.
Whatever you say gump
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:01 am to TheWhizzinator
quote:
Whatever you say gump
Damn straight corndeauxg.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:01 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
A quarterback any time after a change of possession.
What the hell? Why the frick does a QB get special treatment after a change of possession? He's more defenseless than anyone else how?
If that's the rule, then a QB shouldn't be able to make a tackle either.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:02 am to TheWhizzinator
quote:
Whatever you say gump
It doesn't really matter. He could have had both arms tied behind him and launched himself head first at the guy's chin...
My argument there is that there was a legitimate reason for missing the call - due to the nature of the play and the referees having their attention on the potential interception by #13 Belue.
There was no reason to have missed the Loston call.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:03 am to Tuscaloosa
Seemed similar to this play to me, which was reviewed and found not targeting.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:04 am to Tuscaloosa
Well that was my point because its subjective. He was still trying to gain yards from the looks of it so the forward progress part is what i am guessing what the officials saw. Loston definitely crowned him leading with his helmet as always.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:04 am to TheWhizzinator
Landry's defenseless, but it looks like HaHa leads with his shoulder and makes primary contact with Jarvis's chest/shoulder...
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:05 am to lsutothetop
quote:
I'm mad that he got called but not ejected. Literally the worst possible outcome IMO
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:05 am to John Redcorn
quote:
Seemed similar to this play to me, which was reviewed and found not targeting.
Ole Miss player lowered his head.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:06 am to LaBornNRaised
quote:
Well that was my point because its subjective. He was still trying to gain yards from the looks of it so the forward progress part is what i am guessing what the officials saw. Loston definitely crowned him leading with his helmet as always.
Might have been. Check it out at the 1:51:53 mark... tough for me to tell. Initially I thought he was on his way to the ground.
LINK
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:06 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
My argument there is that there was a legitimate reason for missing the call - due to the nature of the play and the referees having their attention on the potential interception by #13 Belue.
Regardless of why it was missed doesn't make it right. At least with the Loston hit they acknowledged that there was some wrongdoing on Loston whether it was the compete right call or not. On the Clinton-Dix hit nothing was ever acknowledged when it is obvious that there was helmet to helmet contact.
Posted on 11/11/13 at 12:08 am to John Redcorn
What has happened with EJ? Played lights out vs Ole Miss and has dissipated since. Is he in the doghouse? Wtf?
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News