Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:28 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
No, we really are. I'm not even talking about football.
You mean equestrian?
Well how the hell do you expect us to beat Texans in that?
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:28 pm to Cockopotamus
It's easier to recruit well in Texas than South Carolina. We don't have to land mostof the elite prospects in our state every year to have a really good team. USC has to, along with needing a little help from Georgia and Florida.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:29 pm to Cockopotamus
TAM has a great chance this year and next. Bama has to replace their great offensive line, and LSU has to replace their defensive team.
Next year, both LSU and Bama will have to replace their starting QBs.
On the other hand, SC doesn't have to play LSU this year, but they would lose to TAM in the C.G.
Next year, both LSU and Bama will have to replace their starting QBs.
On the other hand, SC doesn't have to play LSU this year, but they would lose to TAM in the C.G.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:32 pm to Sheetbend
quote:
but they would lose to TAM in the C.G.
Why?
Also could you imagine the media hellstorm that would be a Clowney vs. Manziel SECCG? Big 10ish fans might start offing themselves if that happened.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:34 pm to Cockopotamus
The biggest difference between the teams next year is QB. Shaw is just a good QB while Manziel is great. The gap between the two offenses is bigger than USC's defensive advantage, which was surprisingly small when I actually took a look.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:36 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
2013... Texas A&M.
Then you woke up
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:38 pm to ASAP
You, however, did not get off the internet. Ever.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:39 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The biggest difference between the teams next year is QB. Shaw is just a good QB while Manziel is great
Well we also have the advantage of making teams prepare for two completely different style quarterback with Dylan Thompson as a reliable option
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:40 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
Why?
Also could you imagine the media hellstorm that would be a Clowney vs. Manziel SECCG? Big 10ish fans might start offing themselves if that happened.
Clowney couldn't get past Matthews, much less catch Manziel...
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:41 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Clowney couldn't get past Matthews
Where do you come up with this stuff?
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:42 pm to TeLeFaWx
Clowney would devour Matthews and Manziel
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:46 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Clowney couldn't get past Matthews
lulz. Clemson was the only team that played Clowney one-on-one last year. the result was 4.5 sacks.
quote:
much less catch Manziel...
Clowney is pretty damn quick
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:53 pm to Cockopotamus
I can't name Clemson's tackles.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:57 pm to Cockopotamus
Except Tiny Richardson mauled him 1v1 including a few pancakes. All anyone remembers is the 1 play where Clowney finally beat him and caused the fumble at the end. It's the best anyone has done against Clowney.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 4:58 pm to Cockopotamus
I believe that over the long haul that A&M will be able to be consistently better than USC'e. Better recruiting base and overall better football program and potential to elevate to elite status.
Answering the question is tough both could make the SECCG this year with USC'e having a small advantage being in the east side of the conference. It would really piss me and the rest of the sec members off if a&m lost the streak for the SEC, especially if they were to lose to an b12 team.
I'll say USC'e does just because I don't think A&M will be able to win the west anytime soon and I give USC'e a much better chance to win the east.
Answering the question is tough both could make the SECCG this year with USC'e having a small advantage being in the east side of the conference. It would really piss me and the rest of the sec members off if a&m lost the streak for the SEC, especially if they were to lose to an b12 team.
I'll say USC'e does just because I don't think A&M will be able to win the west anytime soon and I give USC'e a much better chance to win the east.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 5:03 pm to Roger Klarvin
And Matthews hasn't played left tackled at aTm yet
Posted on 4/23/13 at 5:35 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Yea, all those 4 and 5 star Texas recruits and top 10 recruiting classes really suck.
Without Vince Young, they do not win much, except the Big12 with Bob Stoops coaching them...
Posted on 4/23/13 at 5:41 pm to DaleDenton
quote:
First to win an SEC title? USC or aTm
Neither team will win a national championship in the next 20 years.
Posted on 4/23/13 at 5:41 pm to DaleDenton
Mack Brown is a notoriously mediocre gameday coach and still made two national title games and had 11 straight ten win seasons because he had so much talent. Not to mention that Texas recruits played huge roles in the OU and OSU teams that have made noise over the years.
Page 2 of 14
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News