Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/27/15 at 10:21 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Are you fricking stupid? Have some fricking common sense. The OPD is going to know why he didn't pick up the telephone and dial 911 instead of protecting his mother.
Yep, illiterate. And if you're going to play Internet Tough Guy like you did in your previous post, have the balls to just write words like "pussy" and "fricking" instead of misspelling them. You sound like an idiot.
Edit: Here, I'll spell it out for you, since it's clear you don't understand how the law works. What I wrote was that Tunsil was on solid moral ground. But the detail thus far indicate he was arrested for punching his step-father in legally-uncertain circumstances. Nothing being said so far indicates that he acted in direct defense of his mother, i.e. what he did prevented her from being injured. If he did, then he's clear, not just morally but legally. If, on the other hand, he acted in retaliation, which is what everything so far indicates, he's on legally-shaky ground. Just because many of us consider him morally justified, that doesn't mean the law will give him a pass. He'd be considered guilty of simple battery. Legally, you can't simply commit a crime against someone because they committed a crime against someone. It's considered vigilantism, and is against the law. That's why the cops will be asking why he didn't call them. If his step-father chooses to press charges and Tunsil can't prove he acted in self-defense or in direct defense of his mother's person, he will likely be charged with a crime. Is that justice? Probably not. But it is how the legal situation would stand given the details we are currently privy to. There's a reason for that -- allowing people to commit crimes because other people have committed crimes is considered, and logically so, a dangerously slippery slope. You're allowed immediate self-defense (or defense of someone else.) If you can't prove that, then you're legally expected to call the police instead of attacking the other person because the police are trained to deal with criminal situations in a legal and effective fashion.
Your ignorance of the law doesn't change any of these circumstances.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 6/27/15 at 10:57 pm to randomways
quote:
randomways
Thanks, law dog, for breaking it down for us morons. You're still a... pursy.
Guess what dick-your shite gets whacked if you post cuss words on here. That's why the words are changed, hurp a durp.
Make more words on the Interwebz and you will look even smarterz.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:00 pm to DownSouthJukin
Try turning off the profanity filter, moron
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:03 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
Try turning off the profanity filter, moron
I'd rather not get banned, moron.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:06 pm to DownSouthJukin
Lol
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:07 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Thanks, law dog, for breaking it down for us morons.
No problem. Always willing to help the LCD, no matter how rock-bottom.
quote:
I'd rather not get banned, moron.
You've been here for more than a year and are still worried about mommy and daddy?
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:16 pm to randomways
shite, piss, count, frick, cocksucker, motherfricker, and tits 
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:18 pm to randomways
quote:
LCD
quote:
You've been here for more than a year and are still worried about mommy and daddy?
I'll just say this: you can analyze it through the lens of black letter law all day long. But in the end, if what has been reported is true, you have an Oxford city prosecutor who is going to apply common sense and prosecutorial discretion, regardless of what the code says.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:20 pm to craigbiggio
I know-and you're the one that called me out on a barely visible nipple one time.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 11:21 pm
Posted on 6/28/15 at 9:46 am to Vols&Shaft83
Bravo for the tribute to the King's Speech there VS. 
Posted on 6/28/15 at 10:19 am to DownSouthJukin
The Rant was angry as fucccck yesterday. Lol
I even turned up the anger a tad.
I even turned up the anger a tad.
Posted on 6/28/15 at 10:29 am to Bamafan24
quote:
ESPN: Ole Miss Tunsil arrested for defending his mom
ESPN LINK
If the story is true, he was defending his mom. I don't see anything wrong here.
Nothing wrong with defending his mother. The 5 thumbs down must be Mother Haters.
Posted on 6/28/15 at 10:33 am to Vols&Shaft83
Tennessee = Tutorsee = Moron.
Posted on 6/28/15 at 1:23 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
I'd rather not get banned, moron.
What the frick are you talking about
Posted on 6/28/15 at 1:53 pm to Quicksilver
I think Jukin got slapped around by Random and his intellect worse than Tunsils mamas boytoy got slapped by her sons fist.
Posted on 6/28/15 at 1:54 pm to Quicksilver
More is coming out on this. The father says he never shoved mama. Says Tunsil hit him 6 or 7 times. Also has a restraining order vs Tunsil. A judge felt the need to issue it. And step dad has still never been charged.
Why does mama live in Oxford?
Why does mama live in Oxford?
Posted on 6/28/15 at 1:54 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
prosecutor who is going to apply common sense
Posted on 6/28/15 at 3:28 pm to Bamafan24
Tunsil could punch Freeze's Mom and Hugh wouldn't do anything.
Posted on 6/28/15 at 5:29 pm to SouthOfHere
quote:
The father says he never shoved mama.
There's a whole lot of people in jail that didn't commit any crimes.
......that is...if you ask them.
Page 3 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News