re: Does your school have a longer win streak in football than Tulane?

FWIW - THIS is one of the best sites out there to look up NCAA football records

worth bookmarking for sure

quote:

---

This can't be right, can it?

---

This is it.


1960-Missouri (Big 8)

9/17 vs. Southern Methodist (0-9-1) W 20 0
9/24 vs. *Oklahoma State (3-7) W 28 7
10/1 @ Penn State (7-3) W 21 8
10/8 vs. Air Force (4-6) W 34 8 @ Denver, CO
10/15 @ *Kansas State (1-9) W 45 0
10/22 vs. *Iowa State (7-3) W 34 8
10/29 @ *Nebraska (4-6) W 28 0
11/5 vs. *Colorado (6-4) W 16 6
11/12 @ *Oklahoma (3-6-1) W 41 19
11/19 vs. *Kansas (7-2-1) L 7 23
1/2 vs. Navy (9-2) W 21 14 @ Miami, FL Orange Bowl

10-1-0

295 93

quote:

---

BUT - Auburn had a 20 game winning streak The Barn was 11 - 0 in 1993 and won their 1st 9 games in 1994 UGA ended that streak with a 23 - 23 tie & then Bama beat the Tigers the very next week

---

Correct


1994-Auburn (SEC)

9/3 @ *Mississippi (4-7) W 22 17
9/10 vs. Louisiana-Monroe (3-8) W 44 12
9/17 vs. *Louisiana State (4-7) W 30 26
9/24 vs. East Tennessee State (non-IA) W 38 0
9/29 vs. *Kentucky (1-10) W 41 14
10/8 @ *Mississippi State (8-4) W 42 18
10/15 @ *Florida (10-2-1) W 36 33
10/29 vs. *Arkansas (4-7) W 31 14
11/5 vs. East Carolina (7-5) W 38 21
11/12 vs. *Georgia (6-4-1) T 23 23
11/19 vs. *Alabama (12-1) L 14 21 @ Birmingham, AL

9-1-1

359 199

1993-Auburn (SEC)

9/2 vs. *Mississippi (5-6) W 16 12
9/11 vs. Samford (non-IA) W 35 7
9/18 @ *Louisiana State (5-6) W 34 10
9/25 vs. Southern Mississippi (2-8-1) W 35 24
10/2 @ *Vanderbilt (4-7) W 14 10
10/9 vs. *Mississippi State (3-6-2) W 31 17
10/16 vs. *Florida (11-2) W 38 35
10/30 @ *Arkansas (5-5-1) W 31 21
11/6 vs. New Mexico State (5-6) W 55 14
11/13 @ *Georgia (5-6) W 42 28
11/20 vs. *Alabama (9-3-1) W 22 14

11-0-0

353 192

Tulane was a legit player in CFB until they decided to turn their football program off basically.


Major Bowl Games, Long Win Streak, Conference Championships


They'll be a suitable replacement for Ole Miss after the NCAA drops the Bam hammer.

Neither school has won the SEC since the 60's so who would really know we switched them out???

It's not something I care about even slightly... just pointing out how easy it is to win 9/10 straight, and how crazy it is that Mizzou hasn't gotten any higher than 9 straight in presumably 100+ years of existence

quote:

---

Also, win streaks that occurred before SEC membership shouldn't count...let's face it, Big 8 and SWC schedules were much easier that SEC schedules.

---

Yes and no, the bottom half of the Big 8 or SWC tended to be fairly soft, but the upper half of those conferences usually had a couple of honest to God powerhouses.

Also many of the streaks you are referring to for Mizzou, Arkansas, and A&M were from back in the day when the SEC was in pretty much the same boat as far as being top heavy. The 60's for example were the glory days of the SWC in terms of talent and national rankings.

Major separation between the SEC and other conferences is a fairly recent development, other then Bama and Tennessee people would have laughed the hair off their arse at the thought of comparing the SEC to the Big 10 and PAC whatever number they were on back in the day.

quote:

---

They'll be a suitable replacement for Ole Miss after the NCAA drops the Bam hammer.

---

quote:

---

who would really know we switched them out?

---

We'll call them the Tulane Black Bears!

quote:

---

The 2nd one ended with the famous come from behind "Alabama beats Tennessee 17-17" tie

---

Most disappointing non-loss ever

quote:

---

That is terrible logic for South Carolina and Arkansas. Tulane was in the conference for 34 years, while SC and Arkansas have only been in the conference for 24 years.

---

So how many SEC championships will Arkansas win in the next ten years? Zero


Logic is legit.

quote:

---

And only 3 fewer outright SEC championships than Auburn.

---

Well that isnt correct at all...