Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/5/16 at 5:49 am to Nolefan37
Yes. The move had no benefit to the average fan. I was done solely for $$$ that none of us will ever see
This post was edited on 5/5/16 at 5:53 am
Posted on 5/5/16 at 5:54 am to rockytop627
quote:
UK, UT, Vandy, UVA and Mizzou
quote:
I'd take that as a pod any day. We'd walk into the "SEC playoff" 9 years out of 10 :haha:
Considering Mizzou won the East two straight years, you might be jumping to conclusions a bit.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 5:56 am to Piscinin
quote:
Missouri maybe once a decade,
They've already done it twice, so there's that.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 6:11 am to kilo
You fuscksticks just don't get it. jesus h frickalong, even vandy had winning seasons when you needledicks "won" the east. 
Posted on 5/5/16 at 6:20 am to KoachKletus
Can this yankee get a translation for this?
Better yet, translate this you frick:
You can also chew on this Volololol:
Mizzou's all time record vs Tennessee is 3-1.
quote:
You fuscksticks just don't get it. jesus h frickalong, even vandy had winning seasons when you needledicks "won" the east
Better yet, translate this you frick:
You can also chew on this Volololol:
Mizzou's all time record vs Tennessee is 3-1.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 7:14 am to Nolefan37
Yes. No conference should have more than 12 members
Posted on 5/5/16 at 8:47 am to Nolefan37
I'very already posted how that failed....DUMB pod scheduling.
Pod 1/Pod 2 vrs. Pod 3/Pod 4 - yup
Pod 1/Pod 3 vrs. Pod 2/Pod 4 - yup
Pod 1/Pod 4 vrs. Pod 2/Pod 3 NEVER HAPPENED!!!
Why? Who the f**k knows!!!!!
Pod 1/Pod 2 vrs. Pod 3/Pod 4 - yup
Pod 1/Pod 3 vrs. Pod 2/Pod 4 - yup
Pod 1/Pod 4 vrs. Pod 2/Pod 3 NEVER HAPPENED!!!
Why? Who the f**k knows!!!!!
Posted on 5/5/16 at 10:01 am to Kentucker
Yeah we would. People tend to forget our recent history is the exception, not the rule. And we don't even have to be good to win a pod with UK, Vandy, UVA and Mizzou. We could go like 7-5 and still win that pod. Everyone knows we'd win that at least 90% of years.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 10:38 am to Nolefan37
Yes, sort of. My sore point it that Mizzou is just not a good fit for the SEC, A&M barely (the distance factor). I would have preferred schools with more SEC-like similarities or culture, maybe Clemson, FSU, even Ga. Tech.
This post was edited on 5/5/16 at 10:39 am
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:19 am to bamafan1001
quote:
The move had no benefit to the average fan. I was done solely for $$$ that none of us will ever see
The average fan gets to "see" games on a SEC Network that wouldn't exist without expansion.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:36 am to Nolefan37
Nope...should have stayed at 10.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:42 am to Nolefan37
quote:
stayed at 12?
Yes, it would be better if it were just the 12 founding members.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:45 am to Nolefan37
Kick out Arky, USC, Mizzou and Aggy. Bring back Tulane and Georgia Tech.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:49 am to Nolefan37
quote:
I think they should have stayed at 12 since it almost results in 2 different conferences.
12 seems quaint and cozy now.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:50 am to Nolefan37
Yes. TAMU just does not fit in and Mizzou brings nothing.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 11:51 am to bamafan1001
quote:
Yes. The move had no benefit to the average fan.
It really broke the regional flavor of the SEC. I liked that we were considered the "least Southern" apart from Florida. Now it's just SEC-USA.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 12:56 pm to Nolefan37
Aggy has kind of grown on me. Mizzou was ok until they went all hunger strike on us.
Posted on 5/5/16 at 12:58 pm to bamafan1001
quote:
Yes. The move had no benefit to the average fan. I was done solely for $$$ that none of us will ever see
There is a high correlation between the revenue of a program and the winning percentage of a program. You want your team to win, don't you?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News